Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


JAT's inter-city bus service
Belgrade - Niš, 1980s

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2025/26 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • May28
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Air Serbia boosts Tivat operations

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps
NEWS FLASH


Air Serbia is increasing frequencies between Belgrade and Tivat this August due to high demand. The Serbian carrier plans to operate up to 26 weekly flights between the two cities, up from 21. "We are fully committed to the development of air traffic with Montenegro, which is a very important market for Air Serbia. Tivat and Podgorica are our most frequent destinations by far, with 216 return flights to be operated in August alone. Both cities are well ahead of Zurich with 84 and London with 71 return flights. The increased frequencies to Tivat come as no surprise, taking into consideration that it is a popular tourist destination in close proximity to numerous other favourite vacation spots for our travellers. We are certain that this will make travelling easier for a greater number of passengers flying for business or leisure, using our network of more than sixty destinations to reach the Montenegrin seaside via Belgrade", Air Serbia's CEO, Duncan Naysmith, said. The Serbian carrier handled over 245.000 passengers between the two countries in 2018. It recently launched three weekly seasonal flights between Niš and Tivat.

August 08, 2019
Belgrade montenegro Newsflash serbia Summer 2019 tivat
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Nemjee13:34

    The other day JU had 12 business class passengers on the A320 and they were not upgrades. On the way back there were 6 I think.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:19

      When an airline has consistelnly high business class demands they need to introduce wide body aircraft. On all routes shorter than 5 hours, the decision on whether to use wide body aircraft or not depends primarily on business class demand. YU-ARA has 18 Business class seats.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous15:41

      Whatcha talkin' about?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous15:47

      332 is busy flying to the Big Apple.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous16:05

      LH puts 50 or even more business pax in an A320!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous16:21

      They don't put anything, they just move the curtain.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  2. Anonymous14:13

    Crazy demand ... milk that cow, JU :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  3. Anonymous15:03

    Is this the first time JU will have more flights than YM?

    What are the new times?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  4. Anonymous16:07

    As far as I can remember (and I pretty much can:) in the summer of 1992. JAT once Had a record 34 daily flights to Tivat.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous17:05

      You mean weekly??

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous19:35

      Nope, on the one specific day:) That was the beginning of the sanctions, they could not fly anywhere else, all those people who used to spend hollidays in Croatia now headed for Montenegro, and... there you go.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous21:30

      Today at Croatias coast it is difficult to find people from Ex Yu except Slovenians.
      Its even rare to find locals. More and more leave for Germany so that they have to employ people from Slavonia.
      In Yugoslavia in the 60ies it was no problem to meet Macedonians living and working in Dalmatia even on Slovenian coast.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  5. Anonymous17:07

    To better utilize the one aircraft, Nis - Tivat should become daily !
    It is JUs best performing route from Nis ..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous19:18

      Yes, but their goal in Nis is neither to increase passenger numbers nor to earn money.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous19:22

      What are you taking about!? It would definitively not hurt them to earn extra money!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous19:33

      If JU does not increase Tivat then YM could start flying to Nis -
      and this would mean for JU adio profits !

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous20:09

      What I'm talking about is that, with the government subsidizing their losses in Nis, they are not in any way motivated to increase their passenger numbers.

      In other words, why would you work to earn money if someone is giving it to you for free?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous20:17

      "In other words, why would you work to earn money if someone is giving it to you for free?"

      Are you talking about government subsidies Wizzair is getting in Budapest to fly to Sarajevo, Podgorica etc?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous20:34

      I don't know the details of that scheme. But if the Hungarian government is covering all losses Wizzair makes on those routes, then it's the same principle indeed.

      The only difference would be that the Hungarian government wants to increase passenger numbers at BUD, while the Serbian wants to limit them at INI.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous20:54

      You have double standards buddy: JU subsidy bad, W6 subsidy good. It doesn't work like that. But there's more: Wizz is getting all those subsidies at SKP for years, does that also make them "why would you work to earn money if someone is giving it to you for free?"

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous21:09

      Well INI recorded 12% growth in July so I doubt JU is flying empty out of there. Number of flights increased by only 3% btw.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Reply
  6. Anonymous21:30

    Anon 20:54, I really don't want to speak about BUD and SKP because, frankly, I don't know enough about those two schemes. And I never said they were good.

    What I do know, is that the Serbian government covers all Air Serbia's losses in INI, unconditionally, and that doesn't stimulate Air Serbia in any way to grow the routes or make profit. And we know that the government does that in order to control the growth of pax at INI, so it stays below the numbers prescribed by the Vinci concession at BEG.

    Now, if you allow me my personal judgement - I do not think any of this is normal or good.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous21:48

      You seem to be missing the part where cities from INI are regulated by a public call to which only JU applied. Frequencies were also regulated. So any further increases or changes would have to be either covered by JU or the government meaning it would be a complicated bureaucratic procedure. Also JU's A319 is used to the full extent in INI so where would they find extra space to schedule flights?

      Also INI is growing quite fast and it will most likely reach 400.000 this year and maybe 600.000 next year. Vinci doesn't care about INI as long as it doesn't affect BEG.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous21:55

      You can have whatever personal opinion you want, for example that UFOs use Nis airport, but that won't stop me from pointing out how wrong and ridicoulus your opinions are:

      "What I do know, is that the Serbian government covers all Air Serbia's losses in INI, unconditionally"

      Absolutely incorrect. Subsidy is capped at 5mil eur per year, and this site as well as others reported on that.

      "we know that the government does that in order to control the growth of pax at INI"

      Absolutely incorrect. INI growth in July 2019 has been almost 12% and is expected that growth will continue, with 2019 results expected to be at record level.

      "so it stays below the numbers prescribed by the Vinci concession at BEG"

      Absolutely incorrect. Govt didn't publish concession contract yet and "prescribed numbers" were never confirmed.

      "I really don't want to speak about BUD and SKP because, frankly, I don't know enough about those two schemes"

      You should, because you should see how common subsidies are before you start ctiticizing only one airline. Adria gets state subsidy to fly to BRU, Croatia has PSO lines and "joint marketing" etc.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous21:56

      I didn't miss that part at all. I am fully aware that they made it intentionally difficult for any uncontrolled growth to happen.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous22:01

      Anon 21:55, yes, it's capped at 5 mil per year. Which is way more than enough to cover the losses of ASL's INI network.

      Secondly, yes, INI grew in 2019. It comes conveniently so the government can say how it was the right move to take it over from the city. But let's see how the growth will continue over the coming years.

      At the third point, you lost me. You can repeat 'absolutely incorrect' as many times as you want, but when you pretend not to know something that's common knowledge, that even Vucic didn't deny, then I lose further interest in arguing with you, as you are obviously not open minded about this.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous22:42

      Aman you do realize that FR and W6 are free to launch new flights and no one can stop them?! How can the government limit flights if it doesn't have the mechanism to do so. Some things we will read on here, crazy stuff.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous23:09

      @Anon at 22:01 Look, I can't cure insanity. You are denying clear facts pointed out in posts at 21:55 and 22:42. If you don't get it, please seek help.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous23:14

      Anon 22:42, the government can't limit flights, but the airport (which is own by the government) can.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous23:26

      As in, no more slots at INI for you Wizz and Ryan? What a comedian!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous00:27

      Even our beloved Zoka guaranteed the €3 charge for the next five years.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Reply
  7. Anonymous03:19

    The government should let get INI over a million pax a year and instead let more money over for Vinci in Belgrade.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous04:48

      Има ли нека теорија завере где мрачне владе не дају Марибору, Осијеку или Мостару да имају по милион путника годишње? Ало, па једно Сарајево од пола милиона становника, главни град, раде све могуће да јачају везе са Турском и Блиским Истоком, па су први пут у историји прошле године једва прешли милион путника на аеродрому. Пловдив, још већи град од Сарајева и то у ЕУ, аеродромски терминал леп и огроман у односу на Ниш, а једва накупе преко 100 хиљада. Бања Лука може само да сања милион путника још деценијама. Већина ових аеродрома никад неће доћи ни близу милиона, колико год се трудиле управе, владе, авио компаније, субвенције. Па ко нормалан може да помисли да Ниш има тако моћан потенцијал да бре неко мора да га спутава да не би ишао преко милион? Ниш ни са 3 евра није могао ни до пола милиона. Виз и Рајан се боре за Софију али у Нишу их баш брига да се кољу за тако минијатурно тржиште. Ниш НЕМА потенцијал за милион путника ни на дуге стазе. Лудило, овде ни разум ни објашњења не помажу. Још само електро шокове нисмо пробали...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Nemjee08:29

      Па сад... не бих баш рекао да нема потенцијал да стигне до милион путника. Можда не одмах али у наредних 5 до 10 година што да не. Не заборавимо да је много, много људи са југа емигрирало а Ниш може комотно да опслужује и источну Србију. Дакле два региона са великим број људи у дијаспори. Нека се аеродром полако али сигурно развија. Ја сам уверен да ће неке линије Ер Србије из Ниша попут Љубљане, Тивта, Гетебурга... бити профитабилне и без субвенција. Надам се да ће Будимпешта бити укинута како би се та два лета преусмерила на неке друге дестинације. Колико ја знам у овом тренутку у плану су неки новитети у Нишу наредне године. Тако да ова прича није баш сасвим готова.

      А што се теорија завера тиче, слажем се да су људи постали досадни. Додуше више мислим да су то неке њихове жеље неко реална ситуација на терену.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


JAT's inter-city bus service
Belgrade - Niš, 1980s

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Croatia Airlines posts heavy losses and negative equity

Image

Ljubljana tipped for new Tirana and Las Palmas service

Image

Air Serbia to add more A320s to fleet

Image

Two airlines apply for new subsidised flights to Slovenia

Image

Belgrade Airport city rail link work advances

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025