Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


JAT's inter-city bus service
Belgrade - Niš, 1980s

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2025/26 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • May28
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Zagreb Airport registers busiest April on record

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps
NEWS FLASH


Zagreb Airport welcomed 419.675 passengers through its doors in April, representing an increase of 13.6% on the same month last year. The number of aircraft movements increased by 7.1% to 4.581. The month also saw the airport’s busiest 24 hours on record. During the first four months of the year, Zagreb Airport handled 1.276.641 travellers, representing an improvement of 9.6% on the same period in 2024, or an additional 111.590 passengers. Growth is set to continue into May with current scheduled capacity up 10.1% compared to last year.


Zagreb’s largest airlines by scheduled seat capacity, April 2025


May 09, 2025
croatia Newsflash Results 2025 zagreb
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous13:30

    Lufthansa and Croatia should be counted together :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous17:19

      SMFH

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous12:52

      1330, why? OU has three times more than LH group?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  2. Anonymous13:39

    Hey Admin, when will PRN results be published?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  3. Anonymous13:46

    Great news for ZAG but the airport should be worried about OU's bad peformance. They need to make sure their role becomes even less. Their marketshare should be brought down to 15%-20% range. Like that they won't be severely impacted when they eventually go bankrupt.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:33

      Flew OU to AMS yesterday and only 3 seats left

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous15:37

      If FR had 85% LF, others 80% that means OU had 60%

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous16:19

      I think OU LF at around 60% is in line with what they had until now. We read the other day about their deteriorating finances so makes you wonder how much longer they can last. Sure the government can give them another cash injection but they won't give them enough to keep them alive for another 10 years.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous17:16

      But I don't get which routes are failing, I've flown Frankfurt, Munich, Amsterdam, Stockholm and Copenhagen and they are almost always full

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous17:21

      Average LF for the whole 2024 was around 60%.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Michael18:43

      I don't get it either. I arrived from Barcelona yesterday on the A220 and the plane was almost full. Soon I'm flying back to Copenhagen and that flight is always full.
      Something "weird" is going on with OU and it can only be corruption.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous18:57

      Guessing it's mostly Spaniards, how do you know the CPH flight is full

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous18:57

      Cph flight had 65% LF last year

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous20:06

      They have a lot of domestic routes plus there is also SJJ, SKP etc

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Reply
  4. Anonymous14:08

    Bravo Hrvatska!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:17

      Imagine how big Bravo Hrvatska could it be if Croatia Airlines made ZAG real hub, took advantage of its geoposition, tourism and diaspora and became real airline with much more than 13 percent of market share, instead of miserable tiny irrelevant humiliated feeder

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous16:20

      That ship has long sailed and ZAG will never be a real hub especially not now when they are between VIE/OS and BEG/JU.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous17:25

      Never say never 16.20. Clever people said that loooong time ago. But I understand, writing such comment, you can't be such clever

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous18:00

      And who would do it? Ryanair can't, OU doesn't have the money or the brains... so who is left? A new Croatian company or someone else coming and doing it.

      So spare me your cheap reverse psychology and give me some real ideas and evidence of who could realistically do it. Come on, I'm waiting.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Michael18:53

      ^ You're right. Croatia Airlines could do wonders if it were in private hands, but it's too late for that. Nobody wants to buy it in this state, and the government doesn't seem to want to sell it either.
      It clearly serves its purpose the way it is. At this point, I only wish for justice to be served some day when USKOK hopefully gets involved.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous11:14

      Not every airport needs to be a hub. Zagreb is a small city

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous14:26

      An.18.00 and Michael

      Ownership (in general, not in OU case where it is misused) is not the main issue. There are examples of successful and profitable state owned Airlines and privately owned airline businesses which struggle and eventually go bust. And when I speak who can do it, I speak preciseley about Croatia Airlines. And I don't think the ownership should change. I don't think alliance should be change. I don't think FR, Easy, or any other in HR is the obstacle for their growth. And I don't think JU on one side and OS on the other side are the problem as well. The main reason why I think so is the fact that HR is the biggest ex-yu market, with the strongest tourism, with the most visitors from distant markets, with significant increase of foreign work force, with huge diaspora, with good transfer position for entire Balkans and with entire Slovenia, without carrier and with bad connectivity, one to two hours by road. The second fact why I think should be changed in order to take advantage of the above listed, is shameful OU market share of 13 percent. How and what to do in order to achieve the change:
      1. withdrawal of politics from the airline
      2. closure of posts and positions non existent in order Airlines, created for uhljebs
      3. reduction of overstuffed administration
      4. selection of professional, competent, experienced, proven and devoted management, with top salaries oferred, internationally
      5. change of main role as a feeder
      6. change of highly corruptive decision on single type fleet
      7. doubling or tripling of the network
      8. acquiring of long-haul aircraft and start of limited long-haul operations to destinations in North America, India, and the Far East
      9. high increase of regional destinations
      10. work and joint efforts with ZAG to create propper hub
      11. creation of propper waves system to enable feeding of its own network
      12. cooperation with tourist organization on state level and for cities individually
      13. higher engagment in charter traffic, Adriatic coast in summer, and leisure from domestic market in winter
      14. introduction of much more codeshares with more/new partners, on both ends of the network
      15. srarting work on real, decent marketing, which today is almost non existent
      16. erasing, or if not possible, reducing of corruption to acceptable level
      17. changing of fare and pricing policies
      18. increasing level of in flight services
      Infrastructure of the company exists, professional, experienced and highly skilled professionals exist, especially in operations, numerous advantages of EU open sky agreements, organization memberships and alliance exist, and OU basically have the base to do all of the above. And only if someone don't want to understand it, or have personal benefits from the OU as it is today, could be against of what I am suggesting. And I firmly believe all of the above will happen, sooner or later.
      PIR


      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Reply
  5. Anonymous18:42

    Admin do you know when Q1 results for routes will be published?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  6. Anonymous23:53

    Even if OU went bust dear Jasmin would get another well paid government job.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous19:50

      And not only him but plenty of similar aparatchiks who care about their asses only

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


JAT's inter-city bus service
Belgrade - Niš, 1980s

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Croatia Airlines posts heavy losses and negative equity

Image

Ljubljana tipped for new Tirana and Las Palmas service

Image

Air Serbia to add more A320s to fleet

Image

Two airlines apply for new subsidised flights to Slovenia

Image

Belgrade Airport city rail link work advances

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025