Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


JAT's inter-city bus service
Belgrade - Niš, 1980s

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2025/26 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • May28
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


EX-YU airports handle over 17 million passengers

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Airports across the former Yugoslavia have handled over seventeen million passengers during the first eight months of 2017, with Split, Podgorica and Ljubljana continuing to show significant growth among larger airports in the region. This year will mark the first time at least eight airports will handle over a million travellers as Tivat joins the list this September. Airports of Montenegro, which runs both Tivat and Podgorica, has said it anticipates for the latter to also welcome a million flyers. "We expect to handle a combined total of around two million passengers this year at our two airports. The largest share of travellers passing through Podgorica Airport came from the Serbian, German, Turkish and Italian markets, while the Russian market is still dominant in Tivat", the operator said in a statement.

EX-YU airport results, JAN - AUG 2017

AirportPAXChange (%)
Belgrade3.583.371▲ 8.9
Split2.123.209▲ 23.6
Zagreb2.035.137▲ 10.6
Dubrovnik1.695.464▲ 17.9
Pristina1.298.706▲ 13.6
Skopje1.223.630▲ 10.6
Ljubljana1.117.497▲ 20.6
Tivat854.028▲ 16.2
Podgorica713.392▲ 21.1
Sarajevo668.338▲ 14.1

Croatian airports have seen a bumper summer season, with almost all recording strong passenger growth so far in 2017. Zagreb, Split, Dubrovnik and Zadar registered their strongest year on record. The President of the Air Transport Association at the Croatian Chamber of Economy, Tonči Peović, estimates that annual growth at the country's nine commercial airports will average 10% this year. "The significant rise in passenger numbers at Croatian airports has been influenced by GDP growth in countries that visitors are coming from, as well as numerous other factors, including safety. Travellers want to go on holiday to places where they feel safe", Mr Peović, who is also the General Manager of Brač Airport, said. He added that lower fares resulting from lower fuel prices have also stimulated travel.

AirportPAXChange (%)
Pula450.930▲ 31.4
Zadar443.875▲ 17.4
Tuzla353.423▲ 72.7
Niš213.215▲ 321.7
Ohrid115.435▲ 11.6
Rijeka103.096▼ 3.6
Mostar30.786▼ 18.3
Osijek25.321▲ 20.0
Banja Luka14.745▼ 3.9

Fraport Slovenia, the operator of Ljubljana Jože Pučnik Airport, has revised up its passenger growth forecast into the low double-digit percentage range for the year following a string of strong results. "This growth was due to, on the one hand, the arrival of new airlines and, on the other hand, a significant increase in capacity utilisation by Adria Airways", Fraport said. Meanwhile, Tuzla Airport has recorded spectacular growth, handling 353.423 passengers during the first eight months of the year, up 72.7% on 2016. Growth was fuelled by Wizz Air's expansion in the city. It's counterpart in Niš has also seen its numbers soar, growing over 300%. "With the introduciton of new routes by the end of the year, such as Ryanair's service from Stockholm Skavsta, we anticipate handling 330.000 passengers in 2017", Niš Airport said in a statement.
September 19, 2017
bosnia and herzegovina croatia Dubrovnik Feature Kosovo Ljubljana montenegro Niš podgorica Priština Results 2017 serbia slovenia Split tivat Tuzla zagreb
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:04

    Podgorica is the quiet achiever this year. Not a lot of fuss but really good growth.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:10

      +1 and they have been growing for several years now. On top of that it's natural growth. 2018 looks good as well as with 3 new routes already announced.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  2. Anonymous09:04

    I think it is obvious now that there is no chance Belgrade can reach that target of 5.5 million in 2017. My guess is around 5.3 million, maybe 5.4 which is still a great result.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:11

      Yep looks unrealistic that they will get 5,5 million. Time to tell Vlaisavljevic & Co. to town down their estimates at the start of the year.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:17

      It's not that unrealistic, last year in the period September-December BEG handled 1.633.851 passengers. If they have zero growth they will handle 5.217.222 passengers.

      So the airport needs to add some 70.694 passengers per month. Don't forget that this winter there aren't as many cuts at JU, there is Transavia, Atlasjet, Hainan and second Wizz A320.

      It's not easy but it's not unrealistic.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:20

      I hope you are right but I would say there are not so many cuts. Almost all of JU's destinations are being reduced by one flight per week plus no more AUH from JU. Also no flights to New York for first two weeks of October because of aircraft maintenance.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:22

      The cuts that were made official this year were there last year but were added later on, as in only through the system. That's why it will be the same in a way.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous09:24

      I forgot about that, you are right.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Nemjee11:36

      Interestingly enough, KK will be flying five times per week between BEG and IST. That's one flight more than Pegasus.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Petar Čelik12:36

      regardless if they reach 5,5 i am still pleasantly surprised by this year growth. 9% is great! It will be interesting to see if the next year it would plateau or continue growing like this.

      anyone has the data what are the biggest additions compared to the last year?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous12:40

      Well next year already seems promising, Transavia will be increasing BEG to six weekly in February. (the slowest month of the year)
      BEG's February could come close to 300.000.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Reply
  3. Anonymous09:05

    Out of those 17 Million Pax - almost 10 come from Croatia alone.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:07

      Not really since Croatian airports will likely have ten million for the entire year. This January-August results.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:09

      Oh sorry my fault. Have misread the article! Nice so until now just 17 Million ! That is huge :)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  4. Anonymous09:07

    Skopje getting awfully close to Pristina.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:13

      Could they overtake them?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:40

      It will be tough because Pristina has also been growing by a lot this year.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:46

      Tesko :) but PRN is weaker then SKP in winter so who knows

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anon10:04

      They will come close by Nov but PRN will bounce back in Dec as they're stronger in peaks.

      Close but no cigar.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous14:51

      PRN is being strangled by visa regime. Whenever that gets lifted it shall regain 4rth or 3rd position soon after.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous20:19

      PRN is only immigration to Europe. In Skopje you have more business and tourist travelers its larger and more dominant city. Albanians go to Europe for work only.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
  5. Anonymous09:08

    Sarajevo really should be handling over a million passengers by now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:23

      I think Sarajevo has much more potential because it is heavily underserved. They need to do everything they can to get Wizz to open a base there.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anon10:31

      SJJ should at the very least in PRN/SKP/LJU category. Sadly though, it remains stuck.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:37

      If they made a deal with Wizz Air when they were offered flights it would have been a different story...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  6. Anonymous09:11

    I see Tuzla overtaking both Pula and Zadar this year. If they continue like this they will overtake SJJ one day. lol

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:23

      Agree but Tuzla needs to expand its terminal desperately.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:45

      you call that a terminal?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  7. Anonymous09:11

    It would be amazing if 9 out of 10 biggest airports in ex-Yu get over million passengers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  8. Anonymous09:12

    I have a feeling BEG will be close to 4.2 million after September.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:14

      Yes I think this September is very strong so far.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:18

      +1
      I think September this year had more charters than last year

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  9. Anonymous09:15

    Zagreb will have an exceptionally strong winter with Monarch, Emirates, new Eurowings flights, extra LOT flights, extended Crotia Airlines flights to Barcelona and Lisbon, and the list goes on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:18

      No doubt especially since last winter wasn't that strong. Good work.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. frishki10:03

      But Brussels and ČSA won't be flying during the winter season, so...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:46

      Pity Brussels Airlines. Another decent carrier destroyed by Lufthansa.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous11:10

      It´s quite ok- three daily during winter is ways to much to BRU. In Summer they are back.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Nemjee11:35

      Maybe Wizz Air's LJU-CRL flights had something to do with this winter suspension?

      From what I heard it's not cheap to fly from ZAG to BRU and SN's north American network is not really strong enough to compete with BA, AF, KL, LH, OS... for connecting passengers.

      In other words, they had to rely mostly on the O&D market which doesn't seem to be that big.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous12:11

      Makes no sense, it's two Star Alliance hubs with feed on both ends. On top of that the number of seats is not that big.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous20:14

      First Emirates then CSA and now SN Brussels. I hope this streak ends soon.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous22:18

      @frishkiSeptember 19, 2017 at 10:03 AM

      Expected, Brussels is short of aircraft, the're retiring RJs and are vet lasing CityJet's Sokhoi SJs.

      They are reducing their winter flights to number of EU destinations as a result, also they're in bit of financial bother, we'll see how things for for them in 2018.

      They might not last beyond 2020, me thinks, in any case they'll be back in March and hopefully won't be going away next winter. Brussels is in high demand, two daily connections is a must, especially in the morning.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Petar22:32

      No "negative streak" @anon 8:14 PM - Qatar just few days ago extended double daily throught W17/18, so +4pw compared to last winter. ČSA's pax capacity from last year was barely 1.000 pax/per month, so not much of a loss. OU is "compensating" LHR with LIS, BCN and CPH increased capacity, while Monarch 5pw, Emirates 5pw, LOT 2pw and Eurowings 3pw are all extra capacity. If loads stay the same, ZAG could maintain 10-12% growth throghout the winter...and if they improve, +15% is possible.
      Next year: Air Transat +38% in capacity, Iberia, +40% in capacity, Aegan 3pw to ATH...and the spring 2018 is still far- so nothing cataclysmic happening. BRU is unfortunately not "heavily" used route and OU will take a portion on pax...Brusseles Airlines withdrawing in winter is probably about 3.000 pax/per month at most - most of these are transfers, which will be absorbed through other hubs.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Reply
  10. Anon09:17

    By the way, Eurowings has cancelled the launch of Skopje - Munich.

    Какви дилетанти мајко моја. :)))

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:18

      Is that confirmed? Maybe they haven't loaded the flights in the system?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:19

      The flights have been in the system for months. If they have removed them then its cancelled.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:21

      Such a shame, maybe bookings were weak? Or maybe Austrian Airlines didn't like Eurowings stealing its connecting passengers?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:24

      Poor bookings!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous09:43

      weak bookings or chaos with the Air Berlin crews (they might have allocated them for other more "important" destinations)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anon09:49

      I'd say it's the second part of 9:43's statement. They're a mess right now.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
  11. Michael09:21

    Montenegro is amazing! Such a small country - 2 airports in the top ten.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:39

      Wouldn't it be more sensible for such a small country to have one single airport?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:55

      Anon 9:39 Not at all, 2 airports work perfectly for Montenegro.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anon10:19

      They really need to expand TIV. That tiny place is a mess in summer. One cafe and that's it. *Nothing* after security. I mean, even Tivat's new bus station is bigger than the airport.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:22

      they should sort out the Taxi Mafia at TIV

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous11:44

      Maybe the cost of running a single airport are smaller than those for two and seasonality would be less of an issue (TIV).

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  12. Anonymous09:21

    I enjoy these articles where we can compare the numbers for all airports. Split stands out for me and more capacity is definitely needed. Good job.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:01

      Me 2!

      But I would also appreciate seeing the numbers for the smaller airports, not just large and medium sized one.

      Also Mali Losinj and Portoroz have some traffic, especially also Brac.

      Not sure about Kraljevo and Uzice.

      In general the Ex-Yu statistic should always include 22 (or with KVO, UZC 24) airports.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous12:08

      Kraljevo and Uzice have no traffic except maybe general aviation from time to time and I doubt it's possible to find these statistics. Portoroz and Mali Losinj have negligible numbers and there are probably no updated traffic figures. Considering many airports in ex-Yu don't make their numbers public or don't update their numbers eg Podgorica, Tivat, Osijek, Rijeka it's good we have most of the data.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous15:34

      I think the croatian statistical office publishes all airport data monthly

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous15:43

      They publish it monthly for two months ago so it would not be up to date.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  13. Anonymous09:23

    For me the most impressive result is SPU, they have finally made it to the second spot. Could they still be number one after September?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:27

      It will be difficult but the difference between SPU and ZAG will never be smaller. It's really impressive. That new terminal can't come soon enough.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:28

      They will, they will have aroung 450.000 Pax in September!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:40

      Wow, amazing to see Split at #2

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:52

      SPU will hit 3 Million next year!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Nemjee12:22

      I think SPU should start limiting airlines when it comes to the capacity of aircraft. Forbid all turboprops and aircraft with less than 144 seats.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous15:33

      Most importantly they should a) build a parallel taxiway from the apron to the two ends of the runway and b) improvise one of these temporary buildings ("tents") for the next 2 years till new terminal is ready.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Michael21:05

      Yes, Split will likely be No.1 until October. Great job!!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Reply
  14. Anonymous09:32

    Mostar and Banja Luka seem to have fewer and fewer passengers each year.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:39

      What the hell is going on with Mostar? Italians no longer coming to Medjugorje?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:58

      Let's just say that the Vatican is not so enthusiastic about the so called miracles.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous12:51

      The only flights Mostar currently has is to Italy and the only reason they are operating is because the EU is subsidising these flights. Those subsidies end soon and after that Mostar will be empty if it doesn't amke a deal with some company.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous12:51

      In other words, they consider it a sham.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Q40014:48

      According to what source do they consider it a sham? If anything the opposite is true but as long as what is going on there continues, Rome will not give its official approval because it will give Medjugorje too much potential power. They will wait for everyone involved to die than they will officially recognise it and confirm the apparitions.

      Just for the record, I have been there a couple of times and I'm not convinced.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous17:43

      In the Vatican they are very sceptical. C'mon, the Virgin Mary speaking every secondth of month...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous22:27

      @AnonymousSeptember 19, 2017 at 9:39 AM

      It's a scam, massive scam/sham totally fake. Most people by now who are true Catholics don't believe for a second in Medjugorje nonsense.

      Not long ago, a local woman bought Virgin Mary statue off Ebay and as statue glowed in dark, due to the fact pain used was rich in sulphur/sulfur, it was sold as glowing virgin on Ebay, and you can still buy it, but in Hercegovina, most thought it was a miracle and woman made a shrine out of her house, charging people 20 kuna/5KM to see it. She made little profit you could say.

      Miracles do happen, for conman all the time. I won't mention what I think of Herzegovina Croats or what most Croats think of them, lets just say not blog about these sorts of stuff.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous09:06

      Q400, according to the Pope himself.

      https://www.reuters.com/article/us-pope-medjugorje/pope-says-doubts-medjugorje-apparitions-are-authentic-idUSKCN18A0E8

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Reply
  15. Anonymous09:35

    Good results overall. Nice work from Tuzla and Nis.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  16. Anonymous09:42

    LJU is a bit of a disappointment. Ok, they've grown quite a bit now, but tgey should be ahead of SKP and PRN.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:45

      The thing is, they have grown this year but it's just catching up to 2015 because last year was a disaster. I am not very impressed with Fraport. After 2 years the only new airline they brought is Transavia. They rely way too much on Adria. I understand they are close to other airport but there are ways to overcome that. They should just look at Bratislava.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:47

      If they did what Bratislava is doing, Adria would be out of business within months.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:41

      And Fraport would receive only half of the revenue it collects now, despite serving the same no. of passengers.

      I don't believe Fraport is enthusiastic in developing LJU. By purchasing LJU, Fraport ensured that majority of the traffic from Ljubljana will flow through Frankfurt, thanks to star alliance partners LH and JP.

      It would be surprising to see LJU network flourish under these conditions.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  17. Anonymous09:42

    Bravo Hrvatska!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  18. Anonymous09:48

    Bravo Srbija!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  19. Anonymous09:49

    Bravo Slovenija!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  20. Anonymous09:49

    Bravo EX-YU!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  21. Anonymous09:50

    INI 321.7% WOW!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:56

      It is impressive, especially considering that they had passengers this time last year, so it's not like the base number was 0.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  22. Anonymous09:51

    Since we are talking about ex-Yu airports, which of these need flights between each other. I think Belgrade-Pristina and I am also sure Sarajevo-Podgorica could work.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:55

      Podgorica-Zagreb and Pristina-Zagreb. Both of these operated for years but Croatia Airlines cancelled them recently.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:57

      need flights and could work are two different categories:

      need flights: SJJ-SKP (its a nightmare to travel between these two cities)

      could work seasonally: BEG-ZAD.LJU-SPU, SKP-SPU/PUY/TIV(only lowcost here)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  23. Anonymous09:54

    Bravo Bosna i Hercegovina!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:58

      Well so and so :D Two of them are doing well (although I think Sarajevo is still behind its potential) and two others - Banja Luka/Mostar are really struggling.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  24. Anonymous09:54

    Niš... the airport no one believed in... so proud of my home base :D

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:14

      +1000000 plus the director seems competent. Bright future, slowly heading towards 1 million.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Tranquilis10:22

      We did mate, we did. That's why there are currently flights there. It just took a while.

      The director pulled his weight through and through and never lost faith. Kudos.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:27

      Who would have thought over a year ago that INI would be seeing these numbers.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:43

      I remember back than when people were telling that Serbia has only one airport... Now, I have a good feeling about other airports like KVO too, plus, I can except Istanbul and few new destinations from INI.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Nemjee11:32

      INI is becoming a solid player in ex-YU's B category of airports.

      I am generally curious to see how Ryanair's Stockholm flights will perform.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous21:45

      i commend your comment Nemjee, especially the part about INI being in the B category of airports, and lets please stick to this

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Nemjee21:58

      Of course INI is in the B category but that doesn't mean it can't eventually move into the top A category. ;)

      We should be realistic about both where the airport is today but also about where it can end up.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous22:17

      there was an article recently here about the prospects of INI in the next few years- its still B category.
      i also read that Germania will cancel flights from INI

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Nemjee23:43

      No one said that it will move into category A next year. Aviation developments take years to complete. Nis has been experiencing steady growth which will eventually slow down. What matters is that it stays there.

      Yes, Germania was crushed by Swiss. They started flights much earlier with a more suitable aircraft. Germania is leaving while Swiss is increasing its own flights which shows that they remain confident in the market and its potential.

      I am sure SKP had its own projections and forecasts and then Wizz Air came and everything changed for them. Same thing can happen to INI as well, especially if the Serbian economy keeps on consolidating.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Reply
  25. Anonymous10:09

    Romania and Bulgaria are doing very well. The main airports have impressive growth.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  26. Anonymous10:15

    I think VIE must have similar number of pax as our airports combined. Anyone knows any details about totals?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  27. Anonymous10:27

    Banja Luka's numbers are pathetic.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:31

      But phantom Montefly will start flights in December. LOL :D

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  28. Anonymous10:39

    Good to see not just Skopje but Ohrid doing well too :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anon10:46

      Re: Ohrid. 11.6% is nothing in that traffic range. It's really just organic, nothing special. Add to that the potential Ohrid has as a destination, and my conclusion would be - they really need to make a better effort.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  29. Anonymous10:43

    Overall Croatian airports performing the best in ex-yu.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Q40014:52

      True but the number rely way too much on tourism which makes growth atbCtoatian airports very vulnerable. It would be good to see economic related growth, in other words more business and Croatian based travel play more of a roll in this growth.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous15:44

      What other option do airports such as DBV, SPU or PUY have? Only airport that can have serious traffic without tourism is ZAG

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  30. Anonymous11:17

    Split being the second busiest in ex-Yu is a massive accomplishment!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:42

      +1!!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  31. Anonymous11:46

    Why Mostar has so few pax. Location is good. Is it the airport modern?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nemjee12:20

      It could work with a few flights here and there. Maybe the airport is refusing to cooperate the same way BNX refuses to.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  32. Anonymous11:47

    VIE has around 20 million passengers per year. They were overtaken by Athens last year.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  33. Anonymous11:53

    Yep. So far VIE had 16,25 Mio pax Jan-Aug 2017

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  34. Anonymous11:56

    Airports such as MXP, VIE, CPH, ATH... handle close to the number of all ex-YU airports combined.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  35. Anonymous13:12

    Yes but VIE and CPH are airports that basicaly handle something liike 90% of air traffic for their countries.
    I think the Ex-Yu airports did really well so far.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  36. Anonymous13:14

    Yes but both airports do have competitions. Vienna from Bratislava and Copenhagen from Malmo.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  37. Anonymous14:01

    Well actually, CPH handled far more passengers than entire ex-yu combined (21m vs 29m in 2016).
    Which is sad, knowing that ex-yu is 4 times more people with huge diaspora, and a tourist destination as well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  38. Anonymous14:25

    Yeah but CPH is some to SAS' main hub in addition to also have Ryanair, Norwegian and easyJet based there.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  39. Anonymous15:17

    @anon 1:12
    Well, not really for VIE - comparison of calendar year 2016 results:

    VIE 23,35 Mio (=78%)
    BTS 1,76 Mio
    SZG 1,74 Mio
    INN 1,01 Mio
    GRZ 0,98 Mio
    LNZ 0,44 Mio
    BRQ 0,42 Mio
    KLU 0,23 Mio
    total 29,93 Mio Austria (=100%) incl. bits around Vienna in Brno and Bratislava

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  40. Anonymous15:48

    @2:25 PM

    Not any longer, SAS is going away from using CPH as major scandinavian hub. Actually they have more direct destinations from ARN than CPH today.

    And neither U2 or FR have a base on CPH. U2 never tried making one, and FR tried doing it their way - but got ass smashed by the unions :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  41. Anonymous19:51

    Ryanair just announced it will base a plane in Burgas, Bulgaria, the 10 routes will definitely boost the figures there

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  42. Anonymous20:13

    If they don't start cutting them due to crew shortages.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  43. Anonymous20:26

    Bravo BRAC��

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


JAT's inter-city bus service
Belgrade - Niš, 1980s

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Croatia Airlines posts heavy losses and negative equity

Image

Ljubljana tipped for new Tirana and Las Palmas service

Image

Air Serbia to add more A320s to fleet

Image

Two airlines apply for new subsidised flights to Slovenia

Image

Belgrade Airport city rail link work advances

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025