Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


JAT's inter-city bus service
Belgrade - Niš, 1980s

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2025/26 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • May28
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


State labels Maribor Airport project "misleading"

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

The Slovenian government has labelled plans by Maribor Edvard Rusjan Airport's operator SHS Aviation to invest 660 million euros into its infrastructure as misleading, likening the matter to a tenant renovating an apartment without telling its owner. The Slovenian Minister for Economic Development and Technology, Zdravko Počivalšek, recently noted, "It is necessary to say loudly and clearly that the planned investment is misleading because the signatories, the China State Construction Engineering Corporation and SHS Aviation, do not have the power to conclude such a contract, although they probably have an interest in the investment, just as we do". He added that the state has not been informed of the planned investment and that parts of the envisaged project take up areas not owned or operated by the concessionaire.

Under a preliminary contract signed between the China State Construction Engineering Corporation and SHS Aviation last November, Maribor Airport is to lengthen its runway and expand its facilities. The first phase of the project includes the extension of the runway from 2.500 to 3.300 metres, the expansion of the apron, as well as the construction of a de-icing platform. "This project will be implemented in several stages, and will affect cargo and passenger traffic, as well as the services sector. The funds will be allocated for the extension of the runway, as well as the expansion of the passenger terminal and cargo depot. Furthermore, new hangars and a hotel will be built", the airport operator previously said. The Slovenian government noted that in order for any work to take place, a national spatial plan must first be adopted by the state.

SHS Aviation purchased the "Aerodrom Maribor" operator for seven million euros in December 2016 and won a concession to run the airport for a period of fifteen years. Originally owned by Dutch (60%) and Chinese investors (40%), the company's ownership structure recently changed. The Dutch SHS Aviation stake has been taken over by Villa 1, owned by the Chinese co-director of Maribor Airport, Lingkun Meng. SHS Aviation is also the owner of SHS Villa Mari, which manages residences near Pohorje, in north-eastern Slovenia. Maribor Airport's concessionaire had previously outlined plans to develop Slovenia's second largest city into a hub for Chinese tourists by securing a number of nonstop long haul flights. Currently, Maribor is served by two weekly services from Antwerp via Munich through VLM Airlines.
May 26, 2018
Feature Maribor Privatisation slovenia
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:04

    Surprise surprise

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  2. Anonymous09:04

    The government should be quiet. They were clueless at running ANY airport in the country. Ljubljana went to the Germans, Portoroz to the Serbs and Maribor to the Chinese.

    If you sold them to cover losses in your budget then you lose the right to complain and nag.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:06

      +1 completely agree

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:58

      Keep in mind that the government gets 95000€ from SHS every month... As long they get payed so good they will not care what is going on on the airport, which is sad.

      Haplek

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:11

      Exactly, this is just for show so that people in Maribor think something is going on.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:29

      To be honest, LJU was quite well-run before Fraport. Airlines-wise however, different story.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous12:54

      If even the Chinese with money can't make money out of it because of burocracy and corruption in Slovenia: Chinese investors, for your sanity, just go out of this murky business! You are loosing to much time, energy and of course money.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous14:03

      Are you anon@12:21 who wrote about the most corrupt country in the EU? How about a reity check?

      It's very easy to come up with an absurd plan and then complain about bureaucracy which is killing you.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
  3. Anonymous09:06

    The Chinese have done nothing that they promised.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:10

      The entire deal is very murky.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:30

      As if this wasn't expected from the beginning.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  4. Anonymous09:09

    '...the matter to a tenant renovating an apartment without telling its owner.'

    Just in this case the owner agreed not to care for the next 15 years after the Chinese paid for this privilege.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  5. Anonymous09:09

    What a shock!
    So the "haters" who were laughing at the whole "Maribor becoming a hub connecting China with Europe" were right and the idiots claiming that it was possible to become reality were proven wrong.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  6. Anonymous09:16

    In the light of the recent developments at smaller airports in ex-Yu such as Tuzla, Nis, Banja Luka, Osijek, I feel like Maribor could have gone the same way and attracted LCCs. Now it has nothing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:17

      Didn't Ryanair fly there at some point? I know JP failed to London.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:19

      But how? It is small airport serving small catchment area and close to many other airports already offering many travel possibilities. Portoroz on the other hand makes more sense as it is seaside airport.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:20

      The flew there for a few months but local tourist authorities that were funding the flights didn't have enough money and the flights stopped.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:22

      @9.19 Portoroz is limited by runway length which can't be extended because of terrain and the boarder.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous09:44

      And it's between Pula and Triest.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous10:01

      Yes, Ryan flew to STN. But the local tourist board did not want to subside the flights so Ryan flown away and have not returned since.

      Haplek

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous10:34

      Too many airports in the region with a relatively small catchment area (KLU, GRZ, ZAG, LJU, MBX, TRS) and with highways and Schengen area it just can't work for all the airports.

      It is important to know, Maribor Airport was a political project in Yugoslavia, when there was a hard border between Austria and Slovenia. Nowadays, if you live north of Maribor, it's faster to drive to GRZ than to MBX.

      Unless they offer some serious subsidies to LCCs or play the 3EUR/pax game, there is no future for this airport.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous11:40

      In what sense the border with Austria was a hard border? People from Slovenia were travelling to Austria all the time in ex YU.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous19:07

      Travelling yes, but not nearly as easy as it is with the Schengen regime.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Reply
  7. Anonymous09:26

    @anon 9:22
    Tnx
    I was not aware of that! So there would have to be some expensive buying/demolishing of nearby properties or not possible even with that?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:29

      Kostic bought the airport so that filthy rich people can land their jets before going to one of the fancy hotels there. It was never meant to be a busy international airport.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:31

      When riviera is short makes sense to have it as expensive as possible.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:38

      Well at least they made it, people love to go there and the numbers are not as affected by global events. Croatia should have done the same with smaller struggling airports like Rijeka.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:54

      Portoorz had 25.450 passengers last year which is amazing considering it has no scheduled flights.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous16:53

      That is impressive!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  8. Anonymous09:31

    Wow. I'm shocked lol

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:39

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  9. Anonymous09:49

    This airport can do much better.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:30

      Exactly. But now it's too late.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous17:17

      Why would it be too late?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  10. Anonymous09:55

    Was a fairy tale from the beginning.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:57

      true. sounded too good to be true.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  11. Anonymous09:58

    Wasn't it going to be a global hub with A330s flying in and out? I'm surprised anyone took this seriously. Money laundering perhaps?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  12. Anonymous10:06

    Give it a chance people. There will be no money lost even if it doesn't work out. SHS is paying a fee to use the airport like it says. Their plans are ambitious and even if a part of it is realised it will be major and important

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:11

      +1
      However I do not believe that there are any major changes to happen for the airport.

      Haplek

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  13. Anonymous10:09

    This was a comment someone posted months ago about this (not mine) but they were completely correct.

    This is a smoke screen. The government has only begun developing the spatial plan for the airport a few weeks ago. It will take at least a few years before the spatial plan is adopted, and then there's the design phase and only after all of it is complete can they start construction.

    Who on earth signs a construction contract worth 660 million before they even know what they will be building or even be allowed to build?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  14. Anonymous10:29

    I can only imagine how much money the city has given for "co-financing" flights to China. Better that they invested that money and given it to Ryanair or Wizz air to fly to Maribor.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  15. Anonymous10:32

    How many passengers did Maribor have last year?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:35

      Like a lot.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:37

      6,000. They did worse than Portoroz!!!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:37

      At least this year they let some charters to operate from Maribor to Greece.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous16:54

      6,000 is a terrible results since Chinese were promising 100,000 in first year.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  16. Anonymous10:55

    "Last year Aerodrom Maribor generated a loss of 1.7 million euros"

    https://live.finance.si/8934260/Aerodrom-Maribor-lani-pridelal-17-milijona-evrov-izgube

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous17:07

      Hope the Chinese can turn it around but they have done nothing so far.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  17. Anonymous12:21

    No surprize for one of the most corrupt countries in EU

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:48

      I agree 100%. Please close down this airport it will cost less than any investment. Even pay workers without working for years it's way cheaper than the situation currently. If it's a money laundering scam STOP IT!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous13:07

      What do you mean with "one of the most corrupt countries in EU"? There's a lot more corrupt countries in EU than Slovenia.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous13:35

      Yes, starting with it's southern and western neighbours.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous13:59

      Most corrupt country in Europe? Funny guy ...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  18. Anonymous13:29

    Slovenia sometimes surprises with its performance, being so developed.
    First it was MBX-STN that never worked, second it was LJU that struggled during the last couple of years, third it´s all the fiasco with JP and then comes the Maribor project launching flights to "useless" destinations.
    I don't know, but other ex-Yu airports have done, and working really hard to achieve goals.
    Best examples: SKP/OHD, INI, TZL, Croatian coast.
    Yes, you always say there are many airports nearby, but you also forget that it is a densely populated area similar to the Rhine-Ruhr area.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:42

      Hahaha, I hope you're not serious with your last sentence anon. Rhine-Ruhr area has 5 times the population of Slovenia on an area 3 times smaller.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous19:13

      What are you smoking... Rhein-Ruhr area has more than 10 mio people, almost twice as Slovenia and Croatia together.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  19. Anonymous16:53

    Maribor has a very nice and modern terminal actually. Shame it is so underutilized.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous19:14

      Thanks to Slovenian taxpayers, who paid for yet another completely useless thing in the country.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  20. Anonymous17:09

    This is what SHS promised

    According to its initial plans, VLM Slovenia intended to launch flights from Slovenia's second largest city to Belgrade, Berlin, Hamburg, London, Podgorica, Split, Zurich, Xi'an, Chongqing and Nanchang this summer.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous17:25

      For sure mbx will continue to organize weekly used car market thats all.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  21. Bor17:22

    it took that idiot of minister almost a year to get that. many people knew that beforehand...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:56

      Yes, airport is run in a different way than Olimje spa resort.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  22. Anonymous09:26

    Typically Chinese.
    Only words not covered by any actions...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


JAT's inter-city bus service
Belgrade - Niš, 1980s

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Croatia Airlines posts heavy losses and negative equity

Image

Ljubljana tipped for new Tirana and Las Palmas service

Image

Air Serbia to add more A320s to fleet

Image

Two airlines apply for new subsidised flights to Slovenia

Image

Belgrade Airport city rail link work advances

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025