Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


Inex-Adria DC-9-33RC
Rapid Change aircraft, 1970s

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2025/26 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • May25
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


New Adria owner drafts relaunch plans

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

The new owner of Adria Airways’ permits and licenses, businessman Izet Rastoder, is exploring opportunities to relaunch the carrier, possibly under a new name, and has held talks with potential business partners. Mr Rastoder met with investors in Dubai last week, while a group of businessmen from Russia and the United Arab Emirates, who previously outlined plans to relaunch Slovenia’s flag carrier, have said they are in contact with Mr Rastoder. They have suggested the new airline could operate a three-member fleet, comprising of two Sukhoi Superjet 100s and one Airbus A320-family jet. As previously reported, Mr Rastoder has also held talks with the Slovenian government over their support for a new carrier, however, since then, the Slovenian Prime Minister, Marjan Šarec, resigned, opening the way for either a new government or snap elections.

Izet Rastroder has been tight-lipped on his plans for the new airline so far. As the largest banana trader in the region, his Rastoder Group sells bananas and other exotic fruits under the Derby brand around the world. The naturalised Slovenian, born in Montenegro, rarely gives interviews, and hardly ever answers questions. The Rastoder company was set up in May 1992, with its initial business being the import and export of coffee in the former Yugoslavia. Over the years, its activities have been expanded to the export and import of fresh fruit and vegetables, growing into a highly competitive company on the global market. In 2013, the Group opened a large logistics centre in Ljubljana. Mr Rastoder has since diversified his business and moved into real estate, while his company established Air Adriatic last year, which eventually acquired Adria Airways’ permits and licenses.

Adria’s remaining assets, which are yet to be put on sale, are estimated to be worth 6.23 million euros, of which 3.15 million are for the title to its office building at Ljubljana Airport. The official receiver, Janez Pustatičnik, believes that due to the complexity of the bankruptcy procedure, it is unlikely to be completed before 2024. The bankrupt airline’s remaining assets include its brand name, valued at 100.000 euros, a flight simulator estimated to be worth 93.000 euros, and Adria’s 100% stake in its flight school, priced at 133.500 euros. Until they are sold, Mr Rastoder has the right to lease all of the remaining assets. The bankrupt carrier also has 543.000 euros on its bank account, which will be used to pay a creditor, whose claims are currently subject to litigation. Presently, it is unknown how much Adria owes its creditors, with the list to be finalised on March 2. Mr Pustatičnik believes the process will take four years due to litigations, numerous recoveries and other procedures expected to be launched in Slovenia and abroad.




February 05, 2020
Adria Airways Feature slovenia
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:04

    Sukhois just wont go away, I see.. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:16

      Well it's the perfect opportunity for Sukhoi to give a European airline their aircraft and then try and promote them in hope that some established airline might buy them. It's now or never :D

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:22

      Yeah..it's more like "never" than "now".. :)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:29

      They already had their chance ("Cityjet"). It didn't worked out.

      With kind regards Mihael

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous18:15

      CityJet was terrible choice- big mistake of Russians

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  2. Anonymous09:04

    New the Russians would be involved somehow.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:24

      **knew

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  3. Anonymous09:05

    The only thing I agree with is that the fleet should not be over 3.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:15

      Even 3 is too much to begin with.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:58

      3 aircraft and 2 types. That's going to be REALLY profitable.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous17:01

      Well it seems more logical to have 3 planes. Better than the government's plan of 5 planes
      https://www.exyuaviation.com/2019/11/slovenia-devises-business-plan-for-new.html

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  4. Anonymous09:06

    Good luck, still sad to see JP bankrupt!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:15

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  5. Anonymous09:08

    I'm going to take the unpopular approach around here and say I think a small airline could work. Several destinations, which could work in my opinion are still not covered, and a new airline could fly a lot of charters.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:13

      And which destinations could work that have not been covered?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:21

      Skopje, Sofija, Copenhagen, Tel-Aviv, Brussels for state employees, maybe Dubai.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:24

      What charters? Palma, Relax and Kompas charted a Trade air jet for the whole summer. Charters are covered. I belive SKP is the only one missing, but even this would be at least planned by somebody if it would be feasible.. Nobody misses PRN, TIA,..

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:27

      They are maybe covered for this summer. If an airline is being launched it will probably start by late summer anyway. But there is still winter and next year for charters.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous09:31

      It's always some time for charters.. and look, they are covered even without that blackhole of a company..

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous09:36

      Intelekta covered greek island charters with Aegean from LJU this summer...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous09:42

      So what are you people saying? Not a single route can be profitable from Ljubljana?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous09:59

      It can be, but you'd probably need an ATR72 with a very lean back office.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous10:16

      It can be. But not for some small startup flying some random aircrafts..

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous10:32

      not only aegean, i saw charters from LJU to Chios to be operated by OU

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous11:57

      And who told you that noone is missing PRN? Slovenia has more business with Kosovo than Macedonia (IPKO, NLB, Petrol, MORS,...).

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Anonymous15:25

      Despite the business links there is not much demand for travel. In 2019 only 2% of passengers at PRN airport traveled point to point to or from Ljubljana.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    13. Anonymous15:55

      I wonder how much P2P was on Adria's flights on their Balkan flights. I bet not more than 20%.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    14. Anonymous20:25

      Anon 15:25 and 15:55

      It's really a shame to publish inaccurate data. On Balkan routes JP had between 40 and 50% share of P2P pax. With so many direct flights between Balkan cities and Europe (JP had PRN/TIA - FRA/MUC) you can not expect to get 95% conx traffic with one stop.

      at 11:57 I already explained some of the business in Kosovo, there is also huge Kosovo community in Slovenia without any serious competition near by.

      I have noticed that there are always few commenters sharing fake data and I am really interested what is purpose of this. I do not want to accuse anyone but this is not helping anyone (except to ex-JP competitors who has much better figures now due to JP bankruptcy).

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    15. Anonymous21:28

      I don't know where your 40-50% data is coming from. If Skobir himself noted that the transfer percentage on PRN/TIA was 90 or 95%. Please provide some source. Because otherwise your statement is also null and void, as you accuse others.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    16. Anonymous21:55

      I believe that we already had that discussion regarding what Fraport said and I can not find anything regarding 90% conx pax. It's really easy to prove how uneducated you are when airline business is concerned.

      Lets take 5 ex-JP Balkan routes (PRN, SKP, TIA, SJJ and TGD) which were mainly operated with CR7 (70 seats). With assumption that each flight had 70% LF you would carry 44 conx passengers. That's 220 passengers in one direction. This would already fulfill your EU flights and then you also have to sell P2P, longhaul and shorthaul flights. If Skobir and Krasnja statements would make any sense than JP would need A380 for their European flights.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    17. Anonymous22:30

      According to Pristina Airport only 2% of their total passengers traveled to/from Slovenia. Considering Adria had daily flights, it means most were connecting

      https://www.exyuaviation.com/2020/01/eurowings-easyjet-and-wizz-dominate-in.html

      In 2018 it was also 2%.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    18. Anonymous22:55

      If PRN had 2,2 mio pax in 2019 then 2% would mean 45k pax per year. That means around 60 pax per flight on p2p basis in case we consider to have daily flight. So if we take in consideration that PRN was not always operated with CR7 but also with CR9 and sometime even 319, than this figure is much closer to 40-50% of P2P pax than 5% as Skobir and Krasnja would say.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    19. Reply
  6. Anonymous09:09

    Is the Adria brand really worth 100.000 euros???

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:11

      lol that's more than the AOC and other permits which were 45,000 EUR.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:18

      I'm surprised by that estimate too.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:27

      The brand is worthless now.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:51

      Wasn't the name brand sold to some 4K guy in Malta?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous09:54

      It was but then the company owned by the guy in Malta (which was really all owned by 4k invest) was absorbed by Adria (yes it was all fishy) so Adria returned ownership of its brand.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous19:06

      Rule of thumb:New airline-2 a/c=8M euro needed!Everything else is "mutljavina"

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
  7. Anonymous09:09

    I think the Slovenian government shall protect the Adria brand and hold it for themselves until a locally based airline gets a good proof of revenue and overall good business practice.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:12

      I wouldn't be so sure. The government has done little to protect Adria in the last few years. It started off by selling the company to con artists called 4k invest.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:14

      Amsterdam, Vienna, Stockholm, Barcelona...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:19

      You really don't need 3 planes for that. Also I question the profitability of some of those.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:21

      Stockholm and Barcelona didn't work even for Adria which had a lot of transfer passengers. Don't see how it would work on a point to point basis.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous09:26

      I wrote the comment at 9.14 and I meant to post it in the above thread but I see people got the idea anyway :)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous09:43

      @ Anonymous 5 February 2020 at 09:21
      Nothing worked for Adria. That's why they are bankrupt.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous12:00

      Anon 09:21

      you are so wrong here! Schedule flights were quite succesfull under the circumstances which JP focused in last 2 years.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous15:26

      So why were ARN and BCN cancelled if they were so profitable?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous20:27

      I was not talking about ARN and BCN, this was a complete disaster. FRA, MUC, ZRH, BRU were profitable.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Reply
  8. Anonymous09:10

    Televisa presenta

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:45

      +10000 aj ja jaj

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  9. Anonymous09:11

    Meanwhile last week police stormed one of Rastoder's storage units over suspicion one of the banana crates had drugs in them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:14

      What happened?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:18

      Nothing. They didn't find anything. And the company said they called the police though the police had a different account.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  10. Anonymous09:19

    Izet saves the day.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:29

      Let's wait and see.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  11. Anonymous09:20

    It's odd that not a single other Slovenian airline that already has a Slovenian AOC and some sort of operations has not tried to establish scheduled flights from LJU. Amelia Airlines being one of them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:23

      Aren't they going to fly some route in France?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:01

      Because they know it's extremely difficult making profit from LJU if you don't have connecting flights like LH group has.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:04

      @9.23 yes, they are owned by the French group Regourd Aviation who have contracts with Air France. Amelia used to be Aero4m.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  12. Anonymous09:22

    This will either
    A) Never get off the ground
    B) Start and end up in tears after a few months

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:24

      If Flybosnia can make it (regardless of the mess they are in) then I think anyone can.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:28

      FlyBosnia has very very rich backers.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:29

      Who were prepared to have 2 member fleet with 1 plane sitting on the ground for months doing nothing.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  13. Anonymous09:24

    I would like to see LJU-DXB and genuinely think it could work. Maybe that's why 1 A320 has been proposed for the fleet.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:29

      But if it can work so well, why hasn't Flydubai started flights?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:32

      The issue with Dubai is that the majority of Slovenians flying to the Gulf are actually transferring to other points. So Air Banana would have a hard time making DXB work.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:37

      3300 tickets sold in Slovenia to DXB in 2019. Not enough even for a weekly flight, yet alone anything more.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:02

      Forget about DXB. You are competing with EK in VCE, ZAG and VIE with connecting flights all over the world, better brand and top service.

      The new JP would probably offer similar service as LCCs do, and probably at EK prices.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous12:04

      I suppose that they will go for prfitable routes like BRU, FRA, MUC, ZRH. I don't see a reason why governmnet would finance any other routes.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous15:30

      ^ But those are already served by LH, SN, LX... It will be difficult to compete.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous20:31

      I am quite sure that LH group would stop operating after new airline would come in. Flights from LJU to EU cities are only feeders and with current schedule they can not properly feed their longhaul/shorthaul flights as they arrive to late. With JP bankruptcy they have only increased their cost and this is not in favour for them.
      There was also a rumour that LH will secure morning and evening slot on FRA (LH will use ex-JP slots in S20).

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Reply
  14. Anonymous09:30

    I don't know what's more ludicrous. Our government considering throwing money at this or our government considering giving subsidies to Lufthansa satellites to fly routes already flown from Ljubljana.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:35

      +100

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:36

      Exactly. Market is taking good care of itself. New airlines launching flights, existing routes getting more frequencies. Really no need for any of this.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:49

      Is there any data on how Adria impacted Ljubljana/Slovenia. Any information on tourist numbers since October? Events being cancelled? Less business travel?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:51

      I sure hope you're not talking about LJU. By "taking good care of itself" you probably meant we have less flights than before (when LJU was already poorly connected)?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous12:07

      Did you fall from the Moon? What do you mean that market is taking good care of itself? Connectivity can not be worse, that's why most of passengers is taking flights from ZAG, VCE, TRS, KLU,..

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous15:37

      I agree with last anon. I don't think people realise how poorly connected Ljubljana is. Look at the departures board. Barely a flight before midday. A few seasonal flights to Kiev and Madrid aren't going to help much.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous16:15

      Well, it's understandable that people don't understand. They fly one or twice per year and for them LJU's connectivity is superb. For those of us travelling on weekly basis, it's shaite.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Reply
  15. Anonymous09:45

    People might be underestimating this Izet guy. Remember, he is interested in purchasing Montenegro Airlines too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:47

      Agree. Remember he did create the largest fruit business in the region. He obviously knows a thing or two about doing business.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:02

      Well let's see. If he is so smart he will realize that creating this airline is a lost cause and will give up on the idea.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:04

      Airline business is extremely specific. It's very easy to lose millions in couple of weeks when wrong decisions are made. The costs are enormous, and easily become uncontrolled, and profit margins are extremely low, unless you operate on scales of at least 50-100 aircraft.

      Comparing fruit business to airlines is like bananas and oranges :)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  16. Anonymous10:01

    Small Embraer jets would have made more sense for this start up.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  17. Anonymous10:02

    Well he can always buy a small cargo plane to transport bananas.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  18. Anonymous10:12

    If he gets Sukhois we will know he was buying this business as a cover for Russians all along.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:07

      He bought it for the Russians because they obviously did not get Eu partner in time ....

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  19. Anonymous10:13

    Now there will be a banana painted on the planes instead of Adria's logo. Everything is possible here because our small country is ruled by people who do not care about Slovenia

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:46

      Adria was being built for 60 and our corrupt government sold it out, of course some people will make a nice living for the rest of their days because they knowingly signed the death sentence at the time. Of course, no one will ne held accountable. What is left over will be sold for change. First in line is a banana merchant who can barely speak or write.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:55

      The government sold Adria because it was the only solution for it not to go bankrupt even before the sale. Everybody who ever opened Adria's financial report for last couple of years knew the end was near.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous18:49

      @Anonymous 5 February 2020 at 10:55:
      You are correct and I sure as hell know that pigs can fly.

      Adria was throughout its entire history used and abused by politicians. Kocijancic and other communist party members were stealing money left, right and centre. But yes, for the general public it was a poorly run company (which in reality it actually was, but on purpose).


      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  20. Anonymous10:44

    Good thing someone bought this AOC for twice the value it was worth. All credit to the receiver for the courage to set such a high price.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:48

      What are you talking about? The AOC which is a valuable asset was sold very cheaply.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:50

      The AOC also came with a lot of baggage that needs to be addressed.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:20

      45,000 twice the value?? Are you kidding me ?!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  21. Anonymous10:47

    "The naturalised Slovenian, born in Montenegro, rarely gives interviews, and hardly ever answers questions. "

    There is a reason for this. The man can barely speak.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:51

      And he is more successful that any of us. You should learn something from it.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:01

      I prefer to be able to read, write and speak than to have millions...

      To each his own...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:05

      Here we go again:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lt2JmDXuUjs

      skip to 22:45

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous11:58

      my point is that his actions do the talking for him

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  22. Q40010:51

    They should maybe just concentrate on charters and wet leasing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:10

      and how will that help Slovenian economy? LJU needs home carrier to establish flights from LJU.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  23. Anonymous10:54

    Unless this is a part of some larger picture (MGX acquisition) I don't see it working.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  24. Anonymous11:16

    It is what it is. Alenka and the two governments before her sold everything that was worth something to foreigners. This is a fact that will go down in history.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  25. Anonymous11:54

    Hope something good comes out of this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:39

      I wouldn't hold my breath.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  26. Anonymous12:28

    "The naturalised Slovenian, born in Montenegro,.."

    A very important information... Goes to show a lot.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:39

      I don't understand. What does it show?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  27. Anonymous16:02

    I don't know why people are so negative. Give this airline a chance. A lot of unserved markets from Slovenia at the moment, which could work.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:05

      People have no problem for the airline to try. People have a problem for the airline to be state sponsored, which seems highly likely.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous18:53

      Ah, Slovenes have problems with everything. Unfortunately, they're too smart for their own good.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  28. Anonymous16:05

    Not Sukhois again...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:29

      It seems after all that SSJ100's are not reserved for Air Serbia but for Slovenian air carrier

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  29. Anonymous18:59

    Treba svakome dati sansu , kad je uspeo u jednom biznisu sto ne bih i u drugome, pogotovu ako da ljudima koji znaju da vode posao.
    Mislim da je dobra odluka i za njega i za Sukhoi tako reci win-win situacija i da ih moze dobiti po dobrim uslovima, mislim da je ovo jos bolje za Aerodrom LJU. Samo ne znam jel bi idalje ostalo clanstvo u Star Alliance. Za pocetak bi bilo sasvim dovoljno 2 SSJ100 lako je posle uvrstiti druge vece avione.
    Ali bitno da ovde pojedini znaju da pametuju drugima i da im se podmevaju.
    INN-NS

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  30. Andrej76720:38

    Best possible choice now is to get 3 SSJs and after that some of the brand new MC-21s.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. idnas 21:09

      And some 50 years old Ilyushin or Yak :)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Andrej76721:07

      You mean some "new" MAX - no thanks! ;)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  31. Anonymous09:55

    Bananaman steps in and saves a day

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  32. Anonymous19:01

    Izvinjavam se, al covijek nezna dal bi se smijao ili plakao ...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


Inex-Adria DC-9-33RC
Rapid Change aircraft, 1970s

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Croatia Airlines posts heavy losses and negative equity

Image

Belgrade Airport city rail link work advances

Image

Two airlines apply for new subsidised flights to Slovenia

Image

Riyadh Air launches first recruitment drive in region

Image

Air Serbia registers busiest April on record

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025