Montenegro Airlines is gearing up to resume commercial flights in June after almost three months. Montenegro’s two international airports recently reopened for general aviation flights and are expected to welcome commercial services in early June. The Montenegrin carrier has tentatively scheduled its operations between June 1 - 15, with the carrier to maintain fifteen weekly rotations between Podgorica and Belgrade, and a further thirteen weekly between Tivat and the Serbian capital. The remainder of its network is expected to be progressively reinstated from mid-June onwards. “We plan to operate four aircraft this summer season, which means fewer passengers and flights than last year when we had six jets. However, the circumstances are such that it would be too big of a risk to wet-lease one or two aircraft”, the President of the carrier’s Board of Directors, Nikola Vukićević, said.
The Montenegrin carrier estimates its losses will amount to several million euros as a result of the coronavirus Covid-19 pandemic. “During the first four months of the year, revenue declined from twelve million to six million euros, although variable costs were also significantly lower. We carried some 70.000 passengers on 980 flights compared to 130.000 travellers on 1.800 flights during the same period last year”, Mr Vukićević noted. He added, “Once it becomes clearer as to how the aviation sector will function in the aftermath of the pandemic, we will have to refine the company's commercial strategy and organisational structure. We might have to reduce our workforce”.
Commenting on the 155 million euros in state aid earmarked for Montenegro Airlines over the next six years, which was allocated by the government prior to the coronavirus and is now under review by the country’s competition watchdog, Mr Vukićević noted, “All countries in the region with national carriers have done this. They have injected much more funds than Montenegro into the recovery and development of their airlines. We are talking about hundreds of millions of euros in debt taken over from Jat by the state and investments in Air Serbia. Similarly, in Croatia, the government aids Croatia Airlines with ten million euros each year for public service obligation flights”. Mr Vukićević added, “We can kid ourselves how other carriers would fly to Montenegro if Montenegro Airlines were to cease operations and that it would be more affordable. However, practice has shown this to be untrue. Each nation that doesn’t have its own flag carrier depends on others. Anything other than purely commercial interests cannot be expected from other airlines. In July and August everyone wants to fly to Montenegro, but in January and February they won’t because it’s a loss-making period. This airline was not founded with the sole purpose of being a profit-maker and neither is that essential. The company’s importance is measured in its contribution to the overall economy and tourism industry”.
Finally!
ReplyDelete"This airline was not founded with the sole purpose of being a profit-maker and neither is that essential. The company’s importance is measured in its contribution to the overall economy and tourism industry”.
ReplyDeleteSmart statement. Something a lot of people don't get on here.
This too:
Delete"Each nation that doesn’t have its own flag carrier depends on others. Anything other than purely commercial interests cannot be expected from other airlines."
my reaction : lol
Deletethat statement is nothing but an excuse for the state of the company
I don’t think an airline should offer destinations that are not profitable. After all, it’s all about business. I’d mention taxpayers money (I know a lot of will go crazy now), but at the end of the day, why would taxpayers help anyone’s ticket price get lower? On the other hand, what we see LCCs are doing: they lower their prices, make their competitors go bankrupt (e.g. Wizz/Malev) and then their prices increase and become even more expensive than a flag carrier they wiped away. So - at the end of the day - this is a very tricky and complicated thing with a lot of pros and cons.
DeleteJust my two cents...
"This airline was not founded with the sole purpose of being a profit-maker and neither is that essential. The company’s importance is measured in its contribution to the overall economy and tourism industry”
DeleteAnd that is how we will justify pouring 155 Million Euro in a carrier which has only 4 planes in its fleet. (and has huge loses from previous years).
And what else should be expected from airlines than a pure commercial interest?
Sorry that they are not interested in hiring somebod'y cousins
Anon 9.22 But you also need to know that LCC are also taking taxpayers money, as they get subsidies from the country, so it is literally the same as the money is going to the local airline....the LCC can not fly without extra money from country...LCC lower the ticket prizes just because subsidies from the country as they cover up the big part of revenue with subsidies per flight...
DeleteThanks! As I said, it’s very complicated and it seems like a mixture of both legacy carriers and LCC is optimal.
Delete@9.51 the subsidies are nothing ...
Delete@Anon 9:51: “airline....the LCC can not fly without extra money from country"
DeleteWho is subsidising Ryanair to fly STN-DUB, easyJet on SXF-CDG and Vueling on BCN-LIS?
"LCC lower the ticket prizes just because subsidies from the country as they cover up the big part of revenue with subsidies per flight..."
No. The reason why LCCs can sell tickets at low price is because their overall operating costs are low. E.g. Ryanair had 142m pax in FY2019, with average fare price (this is what pax pays for ticket) of 37.03 EUR, scheduled revenue was 5261m. Anciliary revenue (baggage fees, onboard sales, subsidies, etc.) was 2436m, total revenue 7697m.
This equals of TOTAL revenue per pax of 54.20 EUR.
Unless you think they are either hiding a substantial amount of revenue (don't know why any business would do that?) or massively over-inflating the number of passengers (i.e. flying empty planes)?
Smart decision to fly just 4 planes this summer.
ReplyDeleteI don't think they had much choice.
DeleteThey don't need the leased planes as there will be much fewer flights.
DeleteDoes anybody know if Montenegro requires a negative COVID-19 test upon arrival? With all my flights to other Mediterranean destinations being already canceled this summer, I’m thinking of visiting Montenegro again. Thanks!
ReplyDeleteAt the moment no foreigners are allowed in. For people arriving on general aviation a test is required at the moment but I think all of that will change. Within a month or two I don't think anyone will be requiring tests. It's such a stupid concept that it is beyond me, taking into account you can go get a test and two minutes after getting one can get infected. It's completely pointless.
DeleteThank you! And I second everything you’ve said.
DeleteI really hope they open the airport at the start of June. I'm really surprised that not even private flights were allowed.
ReplyDeleteIt's excessive to say the least.
DeleteIt's not excessive, it's just realistic. Government is aware the health system would collapse even with a relatively small number of cases and they can't risk it.
DeleteMakes sense to start BEG since the borders are open and that is the busiest route.
ReplyDeleteThey are open in one direction only for now.
DeleteGood luck MGX. Hope they find their feet in the post corona era.
ReplyDeleteI think some consolidation in this region is necessary.
Deletemost absurd statement ever
ReplyDeleteA big issue for MGX this summer is the Russian market. It remains close and will until July at least. It is Montenegro Airlines' second biggest market (and Montenegro's biggest).
ReplyDelete+1
Delete620k passengers just between Moscow and Tivat last year...
The demand is crazy
DeleteThey have a repatriation flight tomorrow from BEG to TGD.
ReplyDeleteIt's actually not a repatriation flight. It is a charter to return Montenegrin students studying in Serbia.
DeleteDoes that mean they will only fly Embraers this summer?
ReplyDeleteThree Embraers 195 and one Fokker 100.
DeleteWhat's happening with the other Fokkers?
DeleteMost are unfit to fly. I believe they are looking to sell the plane for spare parts.
DeleteNo "Montenegro keeps winning" comment? :(
ReplyDeleteActually it does keep winning. YM remains one of the very fewest legacy carriers in Europe. Today's fares include everything - from catering to checked luggage.
DeleteAnd all it costs is a mere 10 million euros in losses each year and 155 million euros in state aid. Great concept.
DeleteHaving that semi decent offering doesnt justify that large amount of subsidies they need. European market doesnt necessarily ask for 'free' catering and checked baggage, which was an expensive lesson JU learnt.
DeleteThis we don't know. Maybe people are looking for a full service carrier. The fact that it still exists means there are people willing to pay more and experience a legacy airline service. JU must compete with W6 that's why they became a LCC basically.
DeleteAnd YM has both W6 and FR to compete with. In the mean time, YM has not had any significant growth other than their losses they make. If the European market wanted a full service carrier, we wouldnt seen almost all of the European airlines pull of some form of a hybrid model.
DeleteSo in June they will be flying considerably more between TGD/TIV and BEG than JU.
ReplyDeleteIn the first half yes.
DeleteTo apply the logic of some comments, most Adriatic populated islands would be cut off from the mainland. Does not mean that the state avio companies shouldn't strive for leaner mngmnt, but they serve additional purpose as well.
ReplyDelete155 million is just way too much for an airline of MGX's size.
ReplyDeleteIt's over 6 years
DeleteThat's over 20 million per year.
DeleteJU with more than 5 times the fleet and destinations costs less than that.
DeleteGiven that most Serbs will avoid traveling to far destinations, something tells many will decide to go to Montenegro for summer holidays and that Belgrade - Tivat/Podgorica route will boom in July and August.
ReplyDeleteDoes anyone know if they will materialise TGD-LIS?
ReplyDeleteThis route will be quite popular similar to Air Moldavia.
It's still scheduled but moved for July 6.
DeleteGood to hear! There is nobody way for a city like LIS not to work. Their schedule is quite smart. Instead of remaining on the ground at night it departs in the evening and arrives next day in the morning. This will likely be the longest route from TGD.
DeleteIf Montenegro was a somewhat normal country, YM would have long ago gone to the "ropotarnicu povijesti", as Mr. Scuric would say. Only for taxes and contributions from and to personal income they owe EUR 24 million. By the way, in addition to looking through the fingers for all debts to the state and state-owned companies, YM received 5.5 million direct subsidies in 2019 and 7.3 million in 2018. And with all non-payments and subsidies in 2019, they still managed to be in the minus of 7.9 million. And now let's throw another 155m EUR to the pile to be at a negative zero. With 4 (or 5) planes to achieve all this you have to be a real magician. (btw all the numbers can be found on official MNE tax portals like https://www.bankar.me/2020/05/09/objavljena-nova-crna-lista-poreskih-duznika/ and https://eprijava.tax.gov.me/TaxisPortal)
ReplyDelete