Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support
  • Home
  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


Dubrovnik Airport, 1974

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • June24
  • May83
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Adria Tehnika to maintain TAP jets

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps
NEWS FLASH


TAP Air Portugal will send four of its Airbus A320 aircraft for maintenance to Adria Tehnika starting next week until the end of July. Although the development marks good news for the maintenance, repair and overhaul provider, it has ruffled feathers in Lisbon. The Portuguese national carrier has its own maintenance division and its union noted that sending aircraft to Ljubljana is further proof of a lack of staff among its ranks. "TAP performs maintenance tasks on its aircraft in other certified maintenance organisations other than TAP Maintenance & Engineering. It has always done and will continue to do so", the carrier said, responding to criticism. Adria Tehnika, part of the Aviaprime group, is recognised as an Airbus MRO provider and a Bombardier Authorised Service Facility for the CRJ family in Europe. Last year, it iinked a five-year maintenance contract with easyJet.

June 30, 2022
Adria Tehnika Ljubljana Newsflash slovenia
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous13:45

    Its a shame what was LJU turned into in last 2-3 years. Into maintenance, storage and cargo airport.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:14

      Good maintenance costs money, just like with cars. No reason to look at this development as bad. Cargo, too. Airlines and airports earn good money from cargo lines, often more than with flights. No reason to see everything in SLO so negatively when, if you travel around, you see it’s far from bad. Regular air traffic could improve, I agree, but to develop other sectors isn’t bad. Far from it.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. XYZ15:28

      I agree with 15:14 guy;
      If there is cargo demand, you could see some connections being established just because of the cargo demand (for example, Doha could be one of them) - where pax numbers don't really matter that much.
      In addition to that, I think Lju would be recovering way better, if there were both aircraft and workers available, Lju has reached 50% of 2019 traffic last month - which, when you count both adria, covid and now lack of workers/aircraft isn't THAT bad.
      Yes as someone living in Slo, it would be much more convinient to have better connectivity, but it's not that bad at all - at least for business travel, for turism - yeah we are f*ed

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous17:50

      There is already one A320 TAP in LJU. I am also surprised, TAP has very big maintenance facilities for all type of aircafts.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  2. Anonymous20:24

    In the Portuguese government's rescue deal for TAP, one of the European Commission's requirements for approval was that TAP Maintenance & Engineering's Brazilian subsidiary was sold (but there are no buyers) or shut down (which is what's going to happen).

    On the one hand, the low labour costs in Brazil and the fact that many of TAP's aircraft fly there all the time anyway made it look to me as if it was genious to do maintenance there, but apparently, the business is and has been loss-making.

    This should mean that the employees in Portugal have nothing to complain about. They should still have plenty of work to do, while the lack of in-house capacity because of the Brazil business closing down can be covered by external MROs like Adria. In time, maybe they staff up their own operation in Portugal, but for now, this solution probably makes sense.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:10

      Were they maintaining their A319/320/321s or their A330s in Brazil?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:12

      I'm not sure, but they had capability for all those types in Brazil. Could be that they only maintained A320 family aircraft for external clients, though. Either way, if only the A330s were done in Brazil but now will be maintained in Portugal instead, the resources allocated to that work frees up the A320 work for Adria.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


Dubrovnik Airport, 1974

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Zagreb Airport reopens after hours-long closure due to runway incident

Image

Emirates: No plans for Zagreb or Belgrade service

Image

Ljubljana Airport gains momentum as more new routes expected

Image

Wizz Air wins Tuzla flight subsidy tender

Image

Wizz Air to halt London - Sarajevo service

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025