Air Serbia is in the process of introducing over twenty new routes to its network, however, the airline recently said there is more room for growth in the future. While the carrier plans to put an emphasis on increasing frequencies on existing services both in the region and Europe, it has also said there “are a couple of routes in Europe” it is looking at. “The new routes might be outside of our current bank structures so we might start to create additional banks, for example like our flight to London, within this wave of departures. The routes we are looking into involve longer flying time. Maybe some of them will come as early as next year. However, I would not rule out an even earlier introduction”, Air Serbia’s CEO, Jiri Marek, said recently.
Following the introduction of Air Serbia’s new routes during the 2023 summer, few European markets remain unserved from Belgrade. Based on indirect traffic flow volumes, the busiest route without nonstop flights from the Serbian capital is now Manchester. In 2019, the carrier submitted a slot request for a three weekly service to the city but never followed through with either announcing or launching the flights. The Caucuses are the next unserved region from Belgrade with a high number of indirect passengers, followed by Dublin, the Baltics, Porto, Bilbao, Bergen in Norway and Birmingham. Further afield, Air Serbia has said that in the Middle East, Beirut will “most likely” be the next to be considered but added, “We have many other destinations on the priority list before we return to Beirut. That market is not what it used to be before we stopped flying there”.
In recent months, Air Serbia has held talks with the likes of Graz Airport and the operator of airports in Georgia over potential flights. Late last year, the Serbian President said services between Belgrade and Baku would be introduced in 2023. “You need three hours and ten minutes [from Belgrade] to Baku, to visit the beautiful city on the Caspian Sea. This is excellent for Serbian tourists and businesspeople but also Azeri businessmen to visit Serbia. Therefore, after Chicago, another important route will be introduced in 2023”, the President said. Air Serbia also previously noted it is considering the Caucasus region for further expansion. “We are looking at countries like Azerbaijan, Armenia and Georgia, for which Belgrade would be a good option for connecting to Europe”, the airline noted.
I did not expect Manchester to be at the top.
ReplyDeleteShows that despite visas there is still demand.
DeleteKLM is carrying the most of these UK transfers at the moment.
DeleteI don't know why easyJet keeps quiet.
DeleteIf there is such an interest and nobody flies this route, why U2 doesn't react, they have huge base in Manchester?
In BSL and BER they have been kicked out by JU and W6, but it does not mean they should forget other destinations...
Easyjet is quite passive in this region.
DeleteThe airport also has to do some homework and try more to attract airlines.
Delete@9.02
DeleteThis is based on P2P traffic. I think Air Serbia is also factoring in transfer traffic when launching new routes.
Solid P2P demand is a a good basis to start a new route.
DeletePorto is also an easyjet base.
DeleteManchester has a large Serbian population, so it makes sense.
DeleteUp to 80k Serbs living in the UK, waste majority in London. Hardly any in Manchester.
Delete* vast majority
DeleteThere is a fair number of Hungarians (and Hungarian passport holders) from Vojvodina over there.
DeleteA lack of aircraft will continue to be their main issue
ReplyDeleteperhaps also wrong aircraft choice. i dont think many new routes will have the demand to fill 144 seat a319 or bigger a320. but maybe they could grow if they used Embraer e75 smaller plane they can fill or still be profitable even when 70% filled.
Delete@09,05
DeleteI also think that aircraft entering the fleet is not following the same pace as their expansion. Not to mention that their A319 fleet needs major cabin overhauls and standardisation.
@10,46
There is definitely room for a regional jet. I think sorting out their current fleet should be the main priority before endeavouring into regional jets.
Is there any chance of Geneva being reinstated?
ReplyDeleteDon't think so. Easyjet beat them on that route.
DeleteI don't think we will see it return without regional jets in the fleet. I think quite a number of routes could move over to a regional jet fleet while reinstating others
DeleteIn my opinion their current network is more than OK. What they should work on now is increasing frequencies.
ReplyDeleteThat's what they say they are going to do.
DeleteNot only have they introduced new routes but they have increased frequencies as well. ZAG, TIA, LCA, BCN, JFK, MXP, FCO are all examples where frequencies have increased this summer and there are more routes to that list.
Deletehttps://www.exyuaviation.com/2023/03/summer-2023-air-serbia.html?m=1
SJJ is the latest route to see frequency increases as they seem to have received permission for night flights. The timetable is already loaded in the SJJ website starting 15.05.
JU108 BEG SJJ 0025 0135
JU109 SJJ BEG 0430 0520
Those flights are not on sale.
Delete..not yet. I'd give it a few days. It was only loaded a day or 2 ago.
DeleteCaucuses would be a good region for Air Serbia to get transfers.
ReplyDeleteI wonder which destination they will choose in Caucuses. Out of the three - Yerevan, Baku or Tbilisi I'm guessing they will only go for one.
DeleteMy guess is Georgia
DeleteWhen considering that AZal is quite strong opposed to lack or limited national airline that Armenia and Georgia have then they should consider either Tbilisi or Yeravan. I think Armenia has a higher number of citizens living abroad so that would be a + for Yerevan start especially considering that they have a large diaspora in the US.
DeleteYerevan has the highest number of transfers to Europe and no LCC.
DeleteGeorgia has Kutaisi and Wizz Air, it also has Tbilisi, from where there are quite a few flights to European centers. People in Georgia rely more and more on p2p flights, the country has received many new airlines and destinations in recent years.
DeleteYerevan also has very good connectivity with Europe and I think the market is well saturated with carriers from Europe.
In Baku, things are different, here the options for flights to Europe are Turkish, Pegasus, Lufthansa, LOT, Azerbaijan Airlines. In general, the transfer market is held almost entirely by Turkish.
I think Baku is the perfect opportunity for Air Serbia, it will be a great option for the Azerbaijani diaspora in Germany, Italy, France, Great Britain, etc.
There will also be tourist potential.
Baku is an interesting city where a lot of petro money was spent but it is nothing special; two days max to visit. The Caspian sea is nothing special and beaches are not really what our tourists like so all in all the tourism potential of Azerbaijan is quite limited. I don't see many tourists from Serbia been interested in spending their holidays there.
DeleteI don't know visa policies for these countries but I believe they are not favorable. Which could make this region interesting to them too (Montenegro is seeing some charters, I believe) and BEG easy way to transfer.
DeleteI see JU operating BEG-TBS
ReplyDeleteThe fact that the likes of Porto and Bergen are now among the top unserved routes shows that Belgrade offers flights to a lot of cities in Europe.
ReplyDelete+1
DeleteDublin please!
ReplyDeleteWhy Dublin?
DeletePopulation of only 1,2 million people,
Serbian citizens need visas,
almost non existing Serbian diaspora,
no tourism,
very weak economical and political relations
and after all behind MAN and Caucuses region based on unserved routes demand.
Air Serbia could offer good transfer options to passengers from ireland.
DeleteTrue that, since AirFungus has a totally poor intercontinental network? Whilst FR is struggling.
DeleteTo offer transfer options to the airport that has 83 Aer Lingus and 133 Ryanair destinations having in total 38 foreign air carriers?
DeleteI am not that sure.
Irelnad has tourism but very little Serbian tourists
DeleteYes, sure...long sandy beaches with palms and warm sun...not.
DeleteMaybe Serbian tourists would more explore Irish tourism if they could travel there without visa. With xisting visa regime there is no need to introduce BEG-DUB.
@10,20
DeleteYou are quite correct. Nobody transits. Kind of weird that JU sees alot of transfers from VIE and FCO to JFK for example. Not to mention the other combinations. Even INI has transfer pax on flights between HHN/CGN and IST. And out of those FR and EI routes, how many to this part of Europe and with what frequencies?
How far is VIE and FCO from BEG and how far is DUB? Do you know how it would affect ticket price? There is no way JU could offer attractive prices on DUB-BEG-JFK route.
DeleteThis part of Europe?
Direct flights from Dublin to Budapest, Athens, Burgas, Corfu, Dubrovnik, Kos, Santorini, Split, Bucharest, Cluj, Iasi, Sofia, Zagreb, Chania, Plovdiv, Rhodes, Thessaloniki, Zadar, Zakynthos, Heraklion.
And you want to make transfer flights via BEG? Sure, there must be plenty of passengers on SJJ-BEG-DUB or TGD-BEG-DUB route.
JU can only transfer pax from JFK? As I wasn't insinuating that JU launch DUB for JFK transfers, rather that despite those airports having not only a
Deletelarge base carrier and direct long haul flights plus a tonne of connection options, JU still manages to pull transfers from those 2 cities onto its own network.
Most of those routes you listed are seasonal. Aer Lingus has nothing south of BUD that is year round, FR is slightly better with ATH at 4pw. JU on the other hand has LCA, ESB, ADB, IST, ATH, SKG, SOF, OTP, SJJ, TGD, TIV, TIA, SKP, TLV, CAI, HER, CFU, CHQ, RHO, VAR, SPU, DBV, RJK, PUY, OHD, CTA, PMO, MLA, BRI... practically nothing to offer I guess.
I was replying on your claim about JFK.
DeleteSeasonal routes are seasonal with a good reason as they are seasonal in JU network as well...if there is a demand for year round routes airlines in DUB would have flown it.
You mentioned detinations in "this part of Europe" so I do not see how ESB or PMO belongs to ths part of Europe, but as you obviously changed your mind I could inform you that there are direct flights from DUB to Paphos, Istanbul, Antalya, Izmir, Palermo, Bari, Malta, etc...
It is not necessary Aer Lingus to has anything southern of BUD if Ryan has or Aegean that flies ATH-DUB.
Finally there is no need to list JU destinations as we all know where JU flies but Air Serbia can't offer there anything at all as many of these destinations are already covered with direct flights like ATH, SKG, SOF, OTP, CAI (Egyptair), CFU, TLV (El Al), HER, CHQ, RHO, SPU, DBV,...
Yes, you are right. There is really nothing to offer from BEG to DUB. Maybe TGD or BNX.
You completely missed or fail to recognise the point being made. Why are pax travelling from both VIE and FCO via BEG to JFK in decent numbers when they too have direct flights? And tonnes of 1 stop options for that matter. If I'm not mistaken, VIE was even the top 10 transfer destinations for JU's flights to JFK. Why is this the case when VIE not only has daily JFK but also daily EWR?
DeleteThe point is that people will travel if the price and schedule is convenient. Direct flights doesn't necessarily mean that there isn't room for alternatives. Youd be surprised to see where JU has transfer pax. SKP with 2 daily OS and Wizz 3 pw to BTS and yet JU has transfer pax there. OU serves SKP twice daily and yet JU has transit pax there. SOF has 15 weekly flights to Paris and JU has transfers there too. 3-5 daily flights between ATH and NYC and yet ATH is one of JU's largest transfer destinations for JFK. And that list can go on. So why is this happening when there is direct flights? Its a free market and people will travel as they please. Just because there is direct options it doesn't mean they are suddenly banned from transfering. If JU think they have an attractive offer it is up to them to offer. But making the assumption that they'll fail because the destination already has direct flights to alot of destinations is, with all due respect, a really stupid assumption to make considering the evidence for years suggests otherwise.
Valencia should increase up to 3w minimum. That route is going more than good 👍
ReplyDeleteTheir new Lisbon route is performing really well too. Now, they will get competition there in the form of Wizz Air.
DeleteI definitely see Spain getting more increases both in frequencies and routes.
DeleteThen they should start with Madrid -
Deletetheir existing frequencies are pathetic .
Madrid has 3 flights a week this summer.
DeleteStill have a feeling they will introduce Canary Islands.
ReplyDeleteThat one they could introduce already in winter.
DeleteNo, according to JU they will not have wet lease in winter anymore cause there is no demand. Otherwise they would opt for dry lease.
DeleteSo the top unserved route in Spain now is Bilbao. Interesting.
ReplyDeleteI can!t believe It, in my opinión is Tenerife and Alicante but is true Valencia is near from Alicante
DeleteAdd more routes to the Middle East!
ReplyDeleteI think Europe is their priority at the moment.
DeleteErbil should be introduced.
DeleteAnd cancel visas for Iraqis. To Iraq LF 0% from Iraq 100%!
DeleteAre you okay?
DeleteWhen will the third A330 arrive?
ReplyDeleteWhen they get a permit for Beijing and Shanghai.
DeleteHopefully soon. What is taking the Chinese so long?
DeleteThe Chinese.
Deleteahahhaah ...
DeleteWho knows maybe they add Porto sooner rather than later. Look at how quickly they expanded through Spain. From 4 years ago they had no flights there and now 5 destinations.
ReplyDeleteAnd in these 4 years we had more than 2 years of pandemic.
DeleteThey planned all these expansions but they didn't plan the fleet accordingly.
ReplyDeleteI still think that beg-mbx 3 weekly flights with ATR could do pretty well
ReplyDeleteIf they are talking to Graz, it does not leave much room for Maribor.
DeleteHopefully GRZ as MBX has nothing to offer.
DeleteObviously is aimed at transfers. Although there is probably a Serbian community in Graz.
DeleteAs well as in Maribor.
DeleteNobody flies to MBX so therefore JU has nothing to do there.
DeleteGhost airport.
What about Glasgow?
ReplyDeleteWhat about it?
DeleteEdinburgh has much more potential than Glasgow.
DeleteHello elephant! What are you doing in this room? Oh yes, they said they are evaluating you and have contacted your airport. Why can't we talk about you in the room?
ReplyDeleteChange your dealer, bro.
DeleteThose two never heard of expression Elephant in the room
DeleteSo, what exactly is elephant in the room?!
DeleteI don't think he knows.
DeleteGlasgow or Edinburgh! We need it :/
ReplyDeleteIsland, alzir, saudi a
ReplyDeleteWho on earth would they fly to Iceland?
DeleteI would like W6 to open KEF from BEG as they already fly there from VIE and BUD, but Iceland is very expensive.
DeleteI don't think there is a chance. The route would have to rely almost exclusively on tourists and Iceland is extremely expensive.
DeleteOnly chance for KEF-BEG would be if PLAY launches it and transfers passengers onto their new Hamilton flights or existing US routes.
DeleteAnd Norway is cheap so people fly there... What kind of argument is that?!
DeleteAnd yes, there is Serbian diaspora in Iceland, small like the country is small, but it exists.
And finally, Serbs do travel around the globe and spend money, so being expensive destination is not automatically an exclusion for people to go there.
Well, According to me Air Serbia, should open new destinations in Russia. Given how the planes are filled with passengers for Sochi in particular, they could benefit from more profits and therefore more turnover. On top of that, the company could set advantageous prices for them, because European airspace is closed to Russian airlines. I know it may seem silly because Air Serbia already has 3 routes to Russia compared to the United Kingdom, for example, where there is only 1 route from Belgrade to London or other destinations..) This is just my opinion on his.
ReplyDelete****4 routes to Russia, sorry))
DeleteWhat other cities in Russia could work?
DeleteWell, I think Ekaterinburg would be a good option firstly because it is the 4th largest city in Russia (with 1.5 million people), moreover it has enormous cultural and demographic potential with the mountains of Urals located nearby. And I will choose to complete Mineralnye Vody, because it is a very beautiful spa town, where it is good to live in spring and summer, moreover the Caucasus mountains are nearby. This region is very popular.
DeleteEkaterinburg fo sures.
DeleteThey should boost Sochi.
Delete+1
DeleteYes, It is important also to boost Sochi !! I’m absolutely agree !!
DeleteThe new routes this year seem to have been good picks so far.
ReplyDeleteGood luck
ReplyDeleteNo need for other new destinations at the moment
ReplyDeleteIt's not saying they plan to introduce these tomorrow but next year, or maybe at the end of this year.
DeleteErevan is more interesting than Tbilisi both load factor and yield
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely.
DeleteIm surprised they haven't launched EVN by now. Especially now with the increase of Russian travelers.
Delete+100
DeleteAs I said on my previous post, AirSERBIA could double frequencies on all its routes and still have a great LF. Not to mention that Middle-east, Central Asia, China and Africa are gold mines awaiting to be connected to Serbia. They should really not neglect INI and maybe start mini bases in Podgorica and Banjaluka? Great job overall. Can’t think of the European airline with a brighter future…
ReplyDeleteJasmineeeeeee! Dje si? Jesi'l lijepo nocas spavo? Mirno, bezbrizno? Jes'popio prvu kahvu? Masala!
ReplyDeleteJasmin was in Mostar yesterday :D
DeleteDa pokupi pola miliona € i prodaje OMO-ZAG-CPH-ZAG-OMO za 700€.
DeleteA dje ce suza no na oko 😃
Delete- Caucasus (Yerevan, Tbilisi, Baku)
ReplyDelete- Central Europe (Wroclaw, Kosice)
- Secondary airports in ROMANIA: Iasi, Cluj
- Chisinau
- Middle-East (Baghdad, Erbil, Kuwait, Amman, Beirut, Eilat, Alexandria, Tehran)
The largest area without coverage remains the Middle-East.
DeleteBonus: any city literally in Russia or Turkey could work at the moment.
DeleteWhy not adding flights to Russia?
DeleteDa se ne bi zamerali eu, i ovo bi nam zabranili...
DeleteEU cannot do anything.
DeleteHow many routes in total will AS serve this summer season from BEG?
ReplyDeleteHow many destinations will Air Serbia introduce in 2024?
ReplyDeleteIn addition to those mentioned above, I can think of the Canary Islands, Morocco, Tunisia and why not Algeria. They must also work on launching scheduled flights to their existing charter destinations.
Others that come to mind are Tashkent, Ashgabat, Astana, Almaty, Zanzibar, Mombasa, Madeira, Helsinki, Pisa, Reykjavik.
Also, after the market in Ukraine opens up, it would be a good opportunity for Kiev or Lviv.
And Lagos?
DeleteJohannesburg!
DeleteAdis Ababa.
DeleteI suggest Johannesburg 4 weekly, twice via Lagos and twice via Addis. And everybody happy 😃
DeleteYou are fair and good man.
DeleteWhat do you think of Belgrade-Kraljevo?
ReplyDeleteInstead of the plane flying empty, they can make it possible to sell tickets.
They cannot refuel in Kraljevo.
DeleteSkuplja dara nego mera.
DeleteI always wondered why they don't start flights to Finland? There is enough demand.
ReplyDeleteThey did fly to HEL a few years ago.
DeleteJU launched BEG-HEL and cancelled it during the pandemic. Summer 2019 was with the CRJ, winter on the A319.
DeleteW6 announced BEG-TKU, put tickets on sale and never launched the route.
Seems there isn't enough demand for anything bigger than a regional jet.
That was also said about many of the routes JU now flies to.
DeleteThings change. But 2 carriers pulling out within a space of 1 year is alot. They also tried GVA and HAM twice and failed, HAM is having it's third attempt this summer, 4th if you include Jat Airways. HEL wouldn't be the first route that would be more suited for a regional jet.
DeleteFirst of all, they need to evaluate their fleet well! I don't want to wait again for a flight to Tivat that won't take me on vacation...
ReplyDeleteI don't get it. You bought a ticket on JU for Tivat, the flight was late, and then the pilot said he won't take you?
DeleteYes, Tivat is huge pain point. Afternoon flights in season are heavy delayed, even now... Air Montenegro is much better choice for this destination.
DeleteIt would be wonderful if they also had distant charters such as Romania, Bulgaria or all other Eastern European countries. Why the hell are there no charters to Zanzibar for example, even Ljubljana has...
ReplyDeleteQatar has great options for Zanzibar and agencies work with them.
DeleteBrac will be great
ReplyDeleteBrač would be cool too.
DeleteI don't see BWK before making SPU at least daily and year round.
Delete5 weekly flights to Split and 2 weekly flights to Brac would be great
DeleteSPU is currently 6 pw. Or do you think they should reduce capacity on the route to accomodate BWK?
DeleteSPU is mostly A319 btw.
yes, they can transfer that 1 flight to bwk and add another one, and in that way Dalmatia has daily flights to Belgrade, and they covered 2 airports...
Deleteand 319 can also land at Brac airport..
SPU has outstanding destinations and traffic in summer. Don't see JU can offer a lot more than P2P (maybe US longhauls, Split has momentum there). So launching BWK is more realistic than adding frequencies to SPU. As for the winter, I don't know, both SPU and DUB look like underperforming, I wonder is that for a reason. But expanding the operations to entire spring/summer season could be first step.
DeleteSo you suggest for JU to cancel a profitable flight to test out another route that may or may not work. Demand is heavily in SPU's favour, not BWK. There is a reason why SPU is busy in the summer and not so much BWK.
DeleteJU needs more frequencies to both SPU and DBV, especially if they want to capture the long haul demand. That ain't happening if they are spreading out thin their capacity.
by opening flights to Bwk, JU will not lose anything like Split..Ju can only make additional profit on that...
Deleteyes, the demand for flights to Dalmatia is high, and a lot of passengers on those flights are people who vacation, live or work on Brac...
and there are very, very many of them...
every year more and more people from Serbia come to work on Brac, a lot of them stay there even over the winter... so by adding Bwk, Ju doesn't lose anything, it just gains... also if those flights were connected to Russian flights and flights to It would be an added plus for America...
a lot of Russians who have their own houses and villas on Brac and vacation there several times a year.
winter flights to Split and Bwk are not necessary, maybe from Split in 12 months with several flights in 1 month and that would be enough of winter flights...
DeleteI agree that Split with 5 flights and Brac with 2 flights would be a good combination that would offer daily flights to Dalmatia... of course, in case of even greater demand, JU
reacted and inserted additional flights,
and I personally think that it would be best for JU to start developing both airports in Dalmatia in the summer, because it is only an additional offer that would realize additional passengers, and part of the passengers who are now coming via Split would benefit from the comfort and speed of arrival on the island..
Bergen, Birmingham and Graz??? Those destinations have laughably low demand to Belgrade. Air Serbia is also commited to launch Beijing and Shanghai at one point even though they don't have approvals yet.
ReplyDeleteOn the other hand there is an intercontinental destination with very high demand and approvals in place, yet Air Serbia management still won't commit to launching it, not in 2023, not even in 2024.
Miami or Lagos?
DeleteMiami or Lagos? This one has management potential written all over him :D
DeleteIn one year period:
DeleteBilbao, Bordeaux, Manchester, Leipzig, Baku, Yerevan, Timisoara, Tunis, Tripoli, Beirut, Amman, Baghdad, Kuwait, Helsinki. It would be a mistake to increase only frequencies. In next two years long-haul routes Shanghai, Hong Kong, New Delhi, Miami, Toronto and Havana in season.
I think that initially Air Serbia should focus on the destinations launched this year. And at the beginning of next year, it could inaugurate destinations which again, in my opinion, could be: Dubai, because that would allow connections to Australia, South Africa, etc.), where there is a Serbian diaspora. I will then add Bordeaux or La Rochelle in France without kidding, because they are cities where life is good, with a great history, and then Bordeaux is the city of wine, and nearby we even find the city of Cognac .)
ReplyDeleteThe city of Poprad in Slovakia, would be interesting (for winter tourism), but also because it would be the first destination of Air Serbia in Slovakia. Next I will add Mineralnye Vody in Russia for spring/summer (seasonal flights), because it is a spa town, and the Caucasus mountains and Elbrus are close. Subsequently, Portoroz in Slovenia also for the development of the company in this region. Madeira in Portugal, for the fun landing for the Serbian pilots and more seriously because Madeira is a very eco-sustainable place like Skiathos elsewhere in Greece.)
But also Manchester, because it's even an important city in the UK. To come back to the point, there are so many destinations that Air Serbia could launch, because it is a company with a high development potential and I think that we should be proud of Air Serbia even if obviously the company does not is not perfect and sometimes is late or other..) it is a good airline
Dispite disaster regarding fleet shortages?
ReplyDeleteWhaaaaaat?
DeleteJU should finally focus on frequencies instead of new destinations .
ReplyDeleteFor example increasing every new route introduced with twice a week to three .
Most underserved are without doubt Tel Aviv and Madrid which should both become at least daily .
They have no slots on TLV. This is the maximum.
DeleteThe comments show that Marek is potentially a bit out of touch?
ReplyDeleteJU operations look pretty chaotic today. Expansion is the last thing this airline needs. It needs airplanes and a focus on addressing the fleet shortage ASAP.
I really hope they increase frequency to AGP because the flights are full and the ticket prices are way too high now..
ReplyDeleteWith what planes my friend?
DeleteIf they can not, their competitor Wizz could do easily beginning with twice weekly ..!
DeleteWizz also doesn't have too many free capacity.
DeleteJU cancelled Zurich today and Stuttgart, Stockholm and Bucharest tomorrow.
ReplyDeleteWhat's going on?
Stuttgart is cancelled because airport staff in Stuttgart are on strike.
DeleteYU-APK is on unscheduled maintenance.
DeleteStuttgart and Dusseldorf are cancelled due to strikes in Germany, even Eurowings is cancelling their DUS-BEG flight tomorrow.
What about Bucharest and Budapest?
DeleteStockholm to be more precise.
DeleteThey seem to have a problem with their Atr fleet.
The rapid development of Serbian aviation is astonishing.
ReplyDeleteBEG to become an important European hub in a very near future. Hope they never join EU and remain sovereign and neutral….
BEG can never join the EU alone, Serbia would have to. In that case BEG would automatically be part of the EU.
DeleteAlicante is a must. 5th Spanish airport, busiest in the east. And 3,5 people served, more touristic than Valencia, and big a main airport, not served.
ReplyDelete