Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


Pan Am ad, 1983

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus GP Aviation Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Results 2026 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 Summer 2027 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2026/2027 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • April55
  • March83
  • February77
  • January85
  • December89
  • November77
  • October84
  • September81
  • August80
  • July85
  • June80
  • May83
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Lufthansa begins cancelling Munich flights after CityLine shutdown

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Following the closure of Lufthansa CityLine this past Saturday, its parent company, Lufthansa, has confirmed the cancellation of flights from Munich to Ljubljana and Belgrade until at least Friday, April 24, with a further review expected this week. Services to Ljubljana beyond April 24 and up to June 1 have been zeroed out, meaning they remain visible in the Global Distribution System but are not available for booking. All flights between Munich and the Slovenian capital had been scheduled to operate under the carrier’s CityLine subsidiary this summer. In May alone, this accounts for sixty flights (or 120 including return services), totalling 11.712 seats.

Services between Munich and Belgrade have similarly been zeroed out until June. However, a limited number of flights originally scheduled to be operated by Lufthansa mainline remain bookable and are expected to operate. These include services on April 26, as well as May 1, 3, 10, 14, 17, 22, 24 and 31. In total, 74 flights were scheduled to be operated by Lufthansa CityLine to Belgrade in May (or 148 including return services), amounting to 20.268 seats.

All of the airline’s services between Munich and Rijeka, as well as Munich and Tivat, have also been zeroed out for May. A total of four and six flights had been planned respectively (or eight and twelve including return services). Lufthansa CityLine operations in May from Munich to Dubrovnik and Zadar (eleven flights each), as well as Pula (seven flights) and Split (two flights), have also been zeroed out. However, these four Croatian cities have significantly more Lufthansa mainline operations, meaning connectivity to Munich will continue to be maintained at a higher volume.

Lufthansa itself has not commented on the fate of its Munich flights. Services beyond June 1 remain scheduled as CityLine operations and have yet to be updated to reflect the new market reality. Ljubljana Airport has said it has not received any information from Lufthansa regarding the Munich service. While the airline is likely to deploy alternative aircraft on some affected routes, it is unlikely to be able to replace all scheduled services this summer. Lufthansa CityLine had been due to operate flights from Munich to 71 cities in May.

Please note that the information in this article is accurate as of its publication on April 20 at 09:00 CEST. Given the evolving nature of the situation, details may change and will be updated accordingly.


April 20, 2026
Belgrade croatia Dubrovnik Feature Ljubljana montenegro Pula Rijeka serbia slovenia Split Summer 2026 tivat Zadar
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:01

    Let me get this straight. They shut down their subsidiary with 2 day notice. They have absolutely no plan what to do with flights or passengers once they close the subsidiary. They could not be bothered to even communicate with affected airports what will happen. Well done Lufthansa! Now go buy and ruin yet another European airline for which you don’t seem to have any shortage of money for.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:03

      Fully agree.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:31

      No worries, they will create a few new airlines to cover for the demand - Lufthansa Airlines City, Lufthansa Air City Lines, Lufthansa Line City Air and the brand new leisure carrier Lufthansa Find Out.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:39

      This Find Out subsidiary will eventually become Lufthansa FAFO

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:50

      How the mighty have fallen.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous10:10

      LH Group made €5 billion in profits last year. They are far from being the fallen one.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous10:11

      ^ Especially since they made 5 billion, this kind of behaviour is crazy. I know you love them, but this is indefencible.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous10:19

      Why when this model makes them money

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous10:22

      They don't seem to share your optimism that this model will bring them money going forward considering they just shut down a subsidiary with over 25+ aircraft over night, announced long haul cuts and announced that European network will also be cut in winter.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous11:07

      Poruka letačkom osoblju u cijeloj grupi, do kad više ucjene i prijetnje štrajkom pred sezonu?! Nema toga, nije vam ovo socijalizam!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. PIR12:02

      Ono što Vi zovete "Ucjene i prijetnje" oblici su sindikalnog djelovanja u KAPITALIZMU, u čijoj trenutno aktualnoj ultraliberalnoj formi "letačko osoblje" i ostali zaposlenici aviokompanija doslovno moraju razmišljati da li će sutra moći svojoj obitelji staviti kruh na stol, dok se korporativne perjanice iz uprava, baš kao i partijski aparatčici u socijalizmu, nagrađuju milijunima eura za uništavanje tih istih kompanija. A Vas treba biti sram onoga što ste napisali

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous13:04

      +1000

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Anonymous13:18

      Anon 10.22
      I disagree with you. I think they are optimistic because they already have Lufthansa City. They will eventually switch flights to them, they have an alternative.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    13. Anonymous13:28

      5 euro billion in revenue but 6 billion euros in wages

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    14. Anonymous13:29

      Yes, i'm sure Lufthansa City planes were sitting idle and will now be able to take over all City Line flights. These cancellations are for the fun of it.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    15. Reply
  2. Anonymous09:02

    Imagine if an ex-Yu airline had cancelled or left so many flights up in the air. There would absolute pandemonium here.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:03

      My thoughts exactly.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:39

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous12:09

      The Western World is nowadays more Balkans than people would think. Especially Germany is far away from being the Germany we knew from the 1980s
      I work with all Europe. One of my favourite regions to work with in terms of quality AND flexibility is Eastern Europe.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  3. Anonymous09:05

    Thank you for keeping us updated about this. I’m really surprised this isn’t a bigger thing in the media. It’s actually really huge and can have a huge impact on airports and passengers

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:06

      Because most media have no clue what the difference between Lufthansa mainline and cityline is, let alone identify exactly which flights are operated by which. Completely agree with you, thanks admin.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  4. Vlad09:05

    After being a hardcore LH loyalist for over a decade, I stopped flying them in early 2023 after another series of strikes and switched all of my business to AF-KLM. I like to know that I will actually travel when I need to, and honestly I've never looked back. Shame what has become of a once great airline.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:07

      Smart move and I agree. LH has gone downhill. Last week with 4 days of strikes and City Line closure was really crazy.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:08

      KL is far from being a reliable airline, they also tend to cancel flights.
      Like you I also switched from LH but to OS. They are far more reliable and have a fantastic European network.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Vlad09:39

      KL does struggle with winter operations (including the meltdown in AMS in early Jan), but I've never had them cancel a flight on me for operational reasons. In any case, I prefer to risk an occasional change of schedule to these multi-day LH pandemoniums.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:43

      Well AMS tends to have issues with flight movements which tend to force KL to adjust their flights.
      VIE and OS are far more reliable than KL or LH.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous09:52

      Putting JU aside, KLM is the best case at BEG maybe for last ten years.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous10:03

      Agree about KL in BEG.
      If we only compare KL with AF and BA in BEG we see how successful KL is.
      And I congratulate them.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous10:11

      Are they successful? I think they are doing just ok in BEG. They had double daily for a while now and they didn't bring back the B73W and B738 like they had a few summers ago.
      I think they are doing just ok in BEG.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous10:18

      ^ no, they are not successful. They fly 2 daily for the fun of it. To waste time. Can you imagine an airline being successful in BEG? The thought

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous10:20

      I said they are doing ok not that they are unsuccessful. Please read more carefully

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous10:32

      Awaiting passenger data and financial results on their BEG route that you based your "doing ok" claim.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous13:20

      No need. I already listed my reasons but since you are unable to process information here it is again.
      KLM is not really growing in BEG. They had double daily on the E2 for a while. They didn't bring back the B7W and B738 like they did in the past. They also didn't add them this summer, they kept the same as last year.

      Do you have passenger data and their financial results to prove your point?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Anonymous13:27

      ^ thanks for your expert opinion. I would still love to see the passenger and financial data for your baseless conclusion. But good thing we have you as an expert. 2 daily is an absolute disaster for BEG and the route is 'ok' and 'poor'. They are making no money and flying it to waste time. In fact most routes from Belgrade are either 'ok' or unprofitable. We read it from experts constantly. And the long haul ones are political and charters for Chinese workers.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    13. Reply
  5. Anonymous09:05

    I like how BEG airport simply removed the Munich flights like they never existed in the schedule :D no status update that they are cancelled just removed them all togeather

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:26

      They do that every time some flights being cancelled. Not sure what is their problem, but obviously exists

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous13:22

      True that, they should put the cancelled flight on the list... I saw it for the first time when ME carriers cancelled all their flight due to US-Iran war from 28th of February

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  6. Anonymous09:07

    Who would have thought this would happen with flights to Munich.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:11

      Unbelievable

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:14

      or who would have thought that Lufthansa would be such an unreliable partner for airports.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  7. Anonymous09:07

    Time for JU to react.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:08

      That's easier said than done. JU already had a set summer network. Finding an aircraft just to operate this route probably isn't easy.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:12

      We will see. They have generally been very flexible and quick to react. Of course this is likely to be temporary and LH will eventually restore these flights.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:25

      JU was agile in the past, but not any more... So I doubt

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:31

      They aren't anymore? They announced Alicante and increased Spain routes this year when Wizz Air announced new Spain ops, they launched Geneva when easyjet started reducing the route last year and they have 9 new routes this year. Sorry, but they are only not agile in your head.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous11:08

      I would be very surprised if JU didn't react.

      @09,08

      It wouldn't be the first time that JU adds in a destination last minute. I would assume a weaker demand for charters this summer due to the ME situation so this could open up some capacity for JU.

      @09,12

      If JU is quick enough to react, it'll make it harder for LH to return with the frequencies it previously had.

      @10,31

      A couple of flights a week isn't too much trouble to throw into the schedules, especially last minute. If JU does return to MUC I would assume it will be at least daily, which isn't easy to do.

      @10,35

      Flying into MUC doesn't make JU a LH feeder. They after all fly double daily to FRA.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous11:49

      ^ Fully agree!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous15:32

      @ anon 09:08
      Soften demand for Cyprus and Turkey due to ME/Iran crisis could make a couple of weekly rotations to MUC possible?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Reply
  8. Anonymous09:13

    Lufthansa will be back on these routes. It's just a question of whather they will be able to get their act together to get these flights resumed this summer.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  9. Anonymous09:13

    What are they going to do with passengers? I get they will reroute them on other LH group airlines and to FRA but peak season is coming up. With flights full how are they going to find enough seats to get them to their destination?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:25

      The timing couldn’t be worse

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:11

      Probably those transiting through MUC will be rerouted via FRA, ZRH and VIE primarily. The O&D pax will be harder to reroute.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:52

      They are rerouting passengers to Ljubljana via FRA and sometimes via ZRH. P2P as well... MUC-FRA-LJU

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous11:53

      What are the load factors if they are able to reroute all passebgers on scheduled FRA flight

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous12:56

      They spread passengers across the LH flights (3 daily) and LX flights (3 daily); likewise, the morning flight at 10:50 to ZRH is now often operated with an A320/321, as well as afternoon flight at 2:25 to FRA.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  10. Anonymous09:17

    This is so irresponsible that I am speechless.

    Still wonder if it has anything to do with strikes in LH.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:18

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  11. Anonymous09:18

    This is a major blow for Ljubljana. Losing Munich connectivity, even temporarily, is not something that can be easily replaced, especially given how important it is for onward connections.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:24

      Is there any other airline that could step in on this route?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:28

      No need for MUC. As long as we have premium line LJU-FRA with premium LH we don't need other routes. Bravo LHG!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  12. Anonymous09:21

    Lufthansa clearly underestimated the impact of shutting down CityLine. You don’t just remove that many regional aircraft and expect everything to run smoothly.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:45

      I disagree. I think LH realized that shutting them down cost them less than to keep them running. CityLine was not profitable for them.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:46

      So quickly shutting it down shows they were in some kind of rush.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:49

      The power of LH was that they can keep non profitable routes (usually through the subsidiaries) so they can earn on transfers and long haul and close the doors for competitors. And I highly doubt multiple daily Munich operations are not profitable from Belgrade or Ljubljana...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  13. Anonymous09:21

    I wouldn’t be surprised if some of these “temporary” cancellations become permanent.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  14. Anonymous09:21

    Lufthansa’s silence on the issue is worrying. You’d expect at least some clarity given the scale of the disruption.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  15. Anonymous09:27

    It is too early for JU to launch MUC?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:32

      This is a very temporary disruption, plus one doesn't simply launch flights to a massive hub such as MUC.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:46

      They don't?
      Really? How come dozens of other airlines fly hundreds of routes to MUC?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:51

      I would think that if JU can make Valencia or Naples work with A320s so can MUC with E-jets.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous11:52

      Please learn to read. I said it wasn't simple to launch on such short notice, not that establishing flights was impossible.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  16. Anonymous09:36

    If they can’t replace CityLine capacity, expect higher fares across the board.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:38

      The prices have already gone crazy. Looked at an intra European route for several dates this May with LH from Belgrade (via FRA)and its over 900 euros!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:45

      Someone needs to pay for this mess.

      Just I am not sure who will be so stupid to pay ticket BEG-FRA-MUC-FRA-BEG 900 euros if you have BEG-FMM-BEG for 45 eur.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:49

      Almost nobody would pay that of course.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. PIR09:51

      Speaking of payment, result is likely to be few milion euros bonus paid to CEO for his fantastic achievements

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous15:35

      @ anon 09:45
      I'll bet those BEG FMM 45 Eur flights won't stay 45 Eur too long after this.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  17. Anonymous09:56

    Not a good look for Lufthansa. Reliability and network stability used to be their strong points.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  18. Anonymous09:57

    Munich is a key hub for the region. This is a shame

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:12

      Key hub is still FRA.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:52

      MUC has a metropolitan area of 7 million people. Plus LOTS of gastos from our region.
      And it is a much nicer airport to connect than FRA.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  19. Anonymous09:58

    This feels like a network pulled apart overnight. Hard to see how Lufthansa can patch this up anytime soon.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  20. Anonymous10:01

    The scale of cancellations is staggering when you look at the seat numbers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  21. Anonymous10:09

    will LH wet-lease capacity to cover some of the gaps or just accept the shortfall?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:10

      Doubt it

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  22. Anonymous10:16

    Logic says that they will substitute the flights to be operated by another subsidiary of the group. I refuse to believe that they are so stupid to take these actions without a plan. If they do so, they risk losing transfers market from many airports.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:19

      So far it seems they have absolutely no plan. The zeroed out flights in May are a good indication they will be officially cancelled in a few days.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  23. Anonymous10:37

    Jasmin has a number of underused shiny new planes that could backfill the void left in a country reliant on inbund tourism. Or is it too early?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:00

      Way too early.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:40

      OU is amazing. Have 17 daily flights to MUC and FRA. No delays or cancelations. LH struggle to survive, while our lion keep working sucessfully

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:44

      Actually it was reported here this month that OU has cut some MUC flights and reduced capacity on ZAG-MUC from Airbus to ATR.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous12:41

      Jasmin should reduce MUC now. I think that would be smart move. Advice for him. Thank you Jasmin

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous13:23

      Your comments are stupid. CityLine does not fly to Zagreb so there are no cancellations there.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous15:18

      You comment is stupid, bc you didnt realize that Zag could pick up LJU flights

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
  24. Anonymous11:31

    90% did not select Minken himself but their business pays that trips.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  25. Anonymous11:56

    Passengers need to wake up to themselves and see the reality, and make their own choice airline to fly. My advice, don’t fly Lufthansa!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:42

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  26. Anonymous12:40

    They can just move the aircraft to Lufthansa City Airlines (VL). It doesn't make sense to have so many same-same but different subsidiaries, anyway.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:41

      They can't just move them. Those aircraft are not sitting around doing nothing. They are already scheduled on many flights.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  27. Anonymous13:08

    So if they just shut down a subsidurary with 25+ aircraft, what are these planes going to do over summer, surely some one could lease them from LH

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  28. Anonymous15:46

    I’m at the Munich airport right now and honestly I have never seen is so empty…

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  29. Anonymous16:24

    Don't worry, Air Dolomiti will take over. As from Graz and other smaller airports like all mentioned here that lost City Line operatins.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:28

      And Air Dolomiti has planes sitting to take over over 70 routes? As we can see for the moment, no one is taking over and flights are beo
      Ing cancelled.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  30. Anonymous16:49

    In may almost all LJU-FRA flights are on A321 and A320, so they will probably rebook everyone via fra

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


Pan Am ad, 1983
Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2026