Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support
  • Home
  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


Dubrovnik Airport, 1974

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • June28
  • May83
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Ljubljana Airport reaches 50% of pre-pandemic traffic

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps
NEWS FLASH


Ljubljana Airport welcomed 37.604 passengers last month, a significant improvement on the disastrous January of 2021 when it handled under 5.000 travellers. The figure is still down by just over 50% on the pre-pandemic 2020 and have decreased 63.7% on January 2019 during which Adria Airways was still in operation. Overall, during the first month of the year, Ljubljana Airport registered 1.399 aircraft movements. The offered seat capacity from Ljubljana in January stood of 64.6% of January 2020 levels.


February 11, 2022
Ljubljana Newsflash Results 2022 slovenia
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Unknown14:05

    I think they are doing their best. It an entire company behind the airport. We should just wait and see how it goes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14:29

      "I think they are doing their best" you serious or?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous14:45

      ''We should just wait and see how it goes''
      I agree, the market will surely take care of itself. Right?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous16:49

      The market indeed took care of itself. Your expectations or wishes about which destinations should be served or how many passengers should LJU have, have nothing to do with reality. Slovenians do not like to fly, simple as that.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous16:57

      How strange, that all the planes out of/to Istanbul, Moscow, Frankfurt, in the last time even Dubai, are usually full. Slovenian do travel from LJU after all. Let me mention also, that some times Aeroflot and Turkish even sent A330. Hmm ...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous16:59

      P. S.: Forgot to add Amsterdam and London also.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous17:04

      The Fraport fanboy strikes again. Supporting Fraport/LH cartel and their zero strategy bussines on expense of taxpayer money. LOL!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous17:09

      Anon 16:57/16:59 not only these routes you mention, its much more. Also count all Slovenes travelling from ZAG, VIE, TRS, VCE... that don't from LJU because Fraport doesn't give s sh*t about LJU and keeps trying to get rid of competition in order to feed Mutti Lutfi.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous17:13

      I am not really supporting them. I am just sattisfied that the demand exist. I am always saying that LJU and ZAG have to coexist next to each other. LJU gets also many passengers from lower Austria (Klagenfurt, Villach), while ZAG serves both Croats and Slovenes. There is enough demand for both, which is proved by many routes that coexist (Dubai, Istanbul, Moscow, Amstersam, London, Brussels, ...).

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Reply
  2. Anonymous14:28

    JAN 2019: 103.653
    JAN 2020: 75.495
    JAN 2021: 4.923
    JAN 2022: 37.604

    If thats no a disaster then I don't know what it is. And we still hear from Govt. and Fraport (and their fanboys) that everything is perfect and normal. Bravo Fraport! Bravo Slovenia!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:28

      The planes still have far better LF compared to ZAG.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous17:01

      I guess with adria, we would have arround 80k pax or even more?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous17:08

      Passenger numbers will improve greatly, once the situation with covid calms dows. It is true that the number of destinations will be reduced compared to the "Adria times". But the LF on the Lufthansa flights to FRA, MUC are far better compared to when Adria was flying there. I am a Slovene and know many people, who travelled from LJU via Frankfurt lately. In the times of Adria, I don't know of a single one. There were all using Lufthansa or Croatia Airlines flights from ZAG. So I am very pleased, that Slovenes now travel to/via Germany (finally) fron their home airport.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous17:13

      When you lose triple daily to both FRA and MUC of course you expect FRA and MUC to have better LF with far less frequencies.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous17:22

      True. But people nowadays, when Lufthansa is flying to Frankfurt, choose this option far more often. Before, when Adria was here, no one I know even considered looking at the tickets from LJU with Adria. Adria was known as being too expensive. Now this has changed. I have noticed that from the very beginning when Lufthansa took over these flights.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. sloavio21:11

      In this part I agree with anon@17:22. Connecting flights with LH from LJU are much much cheaper now than they used to be with JP. Much cheaper, however this does not help us at the point of airconnectivity. This one is much worse. And low air connectivity affects business more than expensive tickets.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous21:57

      My God I just can't believe how bad air connectivity is in Slovenia. With Adria (and other airlines combined) we had daily CPH, SJJ, double daily AMS, BRU, VIE, SKP, TGD, PRN, TIA, triple daily CDG, ZRH, FRA, MUC and also SOF, PRG, MAN. Now maybe 1/5 or 1/6 of that was replaced. And there are still people who thinks everything is better without Adria..

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous22:28

      Air connectivity is worse, indeed. Considering the great success of some relatively new routes (Istanbul, Moscow, Dubai), I believe LJU will get better connectivity also. But it will take time, unless the conditions or subsidies change, the way they did in ZAG.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Reply
  3. Anonymous21:40

    We have to know that, not all routes were expensive as much as let say brussels. Because brussels was ussualy sold to gouverment people because of Eu...
    But connection flight to let say sofia from fra via lju was cheaper on adria than on Lh with direct flight.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous21:41

      Meant for preavious replies...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous22:22

      Majority of Slovenes never even considered checking the price of the Adria flights. They just weren't used to fly with Adria, it wasn't really their habbit.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. sloavio00:19

      It wasnt their habit? hahaha. I dont believe many people drove to ZAG to fly to FRA, ZUR, MUC, CDG, AMS, when JP was around. For sure there were people, but they did it because ZAG is closer, not because OU was that much cheaper. But people had driven and they keep driving to VCE because of better non stop fares, more options and (even when JP was still alive) much cheaper connecting flights. I dont know many people who drove to VCE to fly to London when LJU had 10-15 weekly flights to different airports in London. I was no JP fan, because its fares were on the expensive side and I hated those worn out CRJs, but it was providing the basic air connectivity. Why Slovenia as the first exyou republic who joint the EU never really got any big HQ for the EXYU market or for the SEE market? One of the reasons was also our air connectivity. Senior managers just do not fly every 2-3 weeks over 2 hubs only to get to LJU. But this does not really surprise me. Zero vision, not just in aviation, but in general.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:14

      Slovenes are VERY strange in the way of purchasing tickets. You said no one would drive from Ljubljana to VCE to catch a flight to London. I can tell you people were (are) doing that, even when LJU had 3 daily to London. They did it just for the sake that they paid 20€ less for the ticket.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous09:32

      The same will be now, when Transavia is starting flights from LJU to Paris Orly. Despite Orly airport is basically inside Paris city zone, many people from Ljubljana will drive to ZAG, to catch a flight to Beauvais, just for the sake of 20€ in ticket price difference. Then they will pay almost 40€ for the return train ticket from Beauvais airport to Paris.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonim11:19

      There i agree completely with sloavio...zero vision unfortunately. 5 years ago mr Skobir was talking about Ljubljans beeing a hub for the balkans. No matter what we think of this, we should dream big invest some money and effort, so we might achieve something. But unfortunately our biggest infrastructure projects are replacing 40 years old trains and 20 years too late building a road to Koroška, which is all good, but that is a must not something we are putting Slovenia on European map. Unfortunately in aviation (and also other areas) we now stepped 20 years back and instead of trying hard to change something, we are trying superhard finding excuses why this is so and why we cant do anything, not to mention how we will never admit that things are not better either cheaper without Adria.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous13:40

      Yes, I agree.

      But we did not step 20 years back but rather 40 years back. Unfortunetly there's always an excuse or someone that's against something.

      Even tho adria was ex0ensive they had the best slots no one will ever have again beside Lh for lju flights.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. sloavio14:25

      Yeah, the best slots are lost, even if there will ever be a new national carrier, which i highly doubt. I hope the new GOV will do something about the air connectivity. Setting up a new national carrier or getting one to base 3-4 aircrafts at LJU is a must. ASAP.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous16:08

      Better to give subsidies than to establish a national carrier. Better that way, because we in Slovenia are experts in ruining everything.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous20:12

      yes we ruin everything but we still get nothing for that money, Adria flew to 25 destinations plus charters and outside LJU for 10 mio. and they employed people from slovenia...

      So I still think it is the best way to have new carrier based here.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


Dubrovnik Airport, 1974

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Zagreb Airport reopens after hours-long closure due to runway incident

Image

Air Serbia to add more aircraft, looks to 2027 for new orders

Image

Belgrade Airport readies for transformation after record year

Image

Ljubljana Airport gains momentum as more new routes expected

Image

Wizz Air to halt London - Sarajevo service

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025