Air Serbia handles 4.19 million passengers in 2023


Air Serbia welcomed 4.19 million passengers onboard its aircraft in 2023, making the year its busiest since launching operations under its current name in 2003, and the third-best result if its predecessors are taken into account over the past 97 years. The figure represents an improvement of 55% on the year before and is up 50% on 2019. During 2023, Air Serbia operated over 45.000 flights, representing an increase of 40% on the pre-pandemic 2019. It maintained a total of 87 routes to 34 countries across Europe, North America, Asia, and Africa, introducing 23 new destinations to its network, including long-haul operations to Chicago.

Air Serbia’s passenger performance by year


Commenting on the result, Air Serbia’s CEO, Jiri Marek, said, “Air Serbia is not just an airline, it is a bridge that connects people, cultures, and opportunities. To preserve this important role, in our daily work, we are dedicated to passenger satisfaction, improving services, and expanding the fleet, and network of destinations. This has been our mission throughout 2023, a year in which we experienced unprecedented growth. This growth would not have been possible without the support of the Government of the Republic of Serbia, which has been our ally and partner in progress. We owe a great deal of gratitude for the success achieved in the past year to our passengers, partners, and employees”.

Addressing the operational issues faced by the airline over the past year, Mr Marek noted, “In addition to the achieved successes, which we can and should be proud of, in 2023 we also faced numerous external challenges that made our work difficult. A slow supply chain and a lack of spare parts on the global market, a lack of manpower and equipment at certain airports, industrial actions of airport services around the world, unfavourable weather conditions - all contributed to the fact that operations were difficult to carry out throughout the year, especially in the summer season. Based on the experiences gained during 2023, we are moving forward. In 2024, we will do our best to adequately address challenges, in order to provide passengers with a better user experience than in the previous year”.

Largest foreign markets by available two-way capacity, 2023


During the year, Air Serbia inked two wide-ranging codeshare agreements. This includes an agreement with Qatar Airways, encompassing over forty destinations, as well as JetBlue, covering 25 destinations. The company hired several hundred new employees, mostly cabin crew members, and had a total of 23 new pilots, the highest intake of captains over the past several decades. During the year, the carrier also rolled out its new uniforms for its crew members and opened a new retail shop in Belgrade.


Comments

  1. Anonymous09:03

    Congratulations. Nice to see Spain in the top 10 markets.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:07

      And it overtook France! Considering Air Serbia barely flew there before the pandemic, that's something.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:10

      I find it absolutely crazy that Spain has not been served for so many years prior. JAT directors should be held accountable.

      Yet Spain is still far from full potential reached, we still have destinations such as Tenerife and Bilbao not served.

      Delete
    3. Nemjee10:18

      Well, when JAT was around there was the visa regime and the purchasing power was still low so most passengers were price sensitive.

      When JAT was replaced with Jat the airline started slowly decaying and things only started to improve in 2013. That said, Air Serbia wouldn't be nearly as successful if the visa regime was still in place.

      Spain does well these days because more people can afford to visit it and not only during summer months but also during winter. Add to this the growing number of transfer passengers and low prices to certain places like BCN where W6 and JU keep on fighting for marketshare.

      If Wizz Air wasn't experiencing fleet issues I am sure they would also put Spain in greater focus. One thing BEG has going for themselves is that airports in its immediate catchment area (OSI, TSR and INI) don't offer any serious competition when it comes to flights to Spain. Naturally people gravitate towards Belgrade.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous11:01

      Anonynous 10.10 . In my opinión Tenerife IS a great option for Winter and Bilbao is not a tourist place rain often and Servían tourist don!t travel to this region

      Delete
    5. What visa regime are you talking about @Nemjee? Yugoslav passport holders didn't need visa for all european countries and plenty of countries on other continents. USA, Canada, Australia, the visa regime was in force, but is the case today as well. And generally yes, it was more difficult to obtain visa before because there were no online visa options, but in case of Yugoslavia, 80-90 % of the travel in JAT was domestic and european, where visa regime was non existent or more or less the same as today.

      Delete
    6. Nemjee13:01

      JAT was terminated in 2003 and until then Serbian passportholders needed a Schengen visa.

      Delete
    7. Anonymous13:04

      I think Nemjee meant from 1996 until 2013.

      Delete
    8. Anonymous13:05

      We needed a Schengen visa until 19.12.2009. actually.

      Delete
    9. Anonymous13:06

      Nemje bad take as always, just give up dude

      Delete
    10. Nemjee13:31

      Last Anon, you need to take a breath and read my comment once again...this time slowly, let it sink in buddy.

      Delete
    11. Anonymous14:27

      Good take by Nemjee, terrible one by mr Pozdrav. As always

      Delete
    12. Yugoslavia disintegrated in 1991-1992. JAT, Yugoslav Airlines, ceased to exist as flag carrier of Yugoslavia at that time. And until 1991, citizens of Yugoslavia had visa free travel big time. Those are the facts, the same as facts are that first Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, followed by Serbia kept the company with its original name, to be renamed later to Jat Airways, but it was not the company of SFRJ any more. I was referring to period until 1991, when real, big Yugoslavia existed, and when people had no visas, and travelled freely, unlike for example Eastern Europe. I believe no one here could even imagine comparing today's Air Serbia with Jat Airways at it lowest stage. When comparing Air Serbia, I believe we compare it with JAT at its best times and its peak. And I am pretty sure @Nemjee understands my explanation. For @An.14.27, no comment, but really 😃

      Delete
    13. Anonymous14:59

      Anon@10:10
      "JAT directors should be held accountable."
      Candidate for stupid comment of the day award.

      Delete
    14. Anonymous21:43

      hahahahaha -- good one!

      Delete
    15. Anonymous17:23

      @anon14:59

      anon10:10 here, just wanted to say relax dude, why do you go straight to attack mode? why are you so triggered? Instead of calling me stupid maybe provide an educational response like Nemjee did.

      I know nothing of that is possible, it was a joke to stress that maybe Spain should have been served many years prior to when it started, as there might have been a lot of potential revenue missed out.


      Delete
    16. Anonymous21:48

      @pozdrav iz Rijeke 14:40

      Građani SFRJ su mogli da putuju u mnoge evropske zemlje bez vize, osim Grčke. Grčke vize su uvek trebale, sve do raspada SFRJ. Takođe, Francuska je uvela vize za građane SFRJ 1986. godine. To se dobro sećam, zato što sam te godine putovao vozom u London i inicijalno je trebalo da idemo preko Kalea (Calais). Obzrom da su Francuzi uveli vize, na kraju smo putovali preko belgijske luke Ostende, u Belgiji smo hvatali trajekt za UK.

      PS. Samo da dodam, osamdesetih godina (i ranije) putovanje avionom je bila svojevrsna privilegija bogatijeg sloja društva, ne samo u SFRJ nego u celom svetu. U to vreme nije mogao svaki gologuzan sa 50 ili 100 maraka/dolara u džepu da kupi avionsku kartu. Karte su bile basnoslovno skupe u međunarodnom saobraćaju.

      Recimo, povratna karta BEG-JFK-BEG je koštala oko dve hiljade dolara, krajem osamdesetih. Prosečna plata u vreme Ante Markovića je bila 400-450 dolara mesečno, pa računajte.... :-)

      Delete
  2. Anonymous09:04

    Good result. How many pax can we expect in 2024?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ilijabgc09:19

      Probably 5~6 millions

      Delete
    2. Anonymous13:03

      6 mil is a lot

      Delete
    3. Anonymous15:30

      7, maybe 8, if not 9.

      Delete
  3. Anonymous09:05

    Great news!
    Is there any info about which A330s will be joining the fleet?
    Are they going to be former EY birds or former Virgin Australia?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:16

      I don't think it will be either.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:03

      There is an AerCap A330-200 F-GZCN, former Air France bird. Ended service for AF at the end of 2023 and has now gone to Portugal, seemingly for repainting. Maybe this is the one for JU?

      Delete
    3. Anonymous10:05

      That plane is 19 years old, I really doubt they would take it. Also it went to Beja in Portugal meaning that it probably went there to be parked.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous10:05

      Two A330 won't be flying before winter 2024.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous10:29

      Anonymous 10:05
      JU CEO said both birds will be here for the summer season.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous11:19

      He said many things which did not become true. These planes were not flying for a long time so it will take a lot of effort to fix them and then paint them and so on. No way they are going to be ready by May/June.

      Delete
    7. Anonymous11:31

      Just because you don't know which ones are coming doesn't mean we all don't know. Inform yourself before commenting on here.

      Delete
    8. Anonymous11:38

      Enlighten me, which ones are coming and who informed you of that.

      Delete
    9. Anonymous12:08

      Is JU going to pay for these planes D-check?
      I hope that if the airline pays for the millions of Euros that a D-check costs for an A330 it will get a cheap monthly lease rate in return.
      The deal that JU had with EY for YU-ARA is an example to avoid.

      Delete
    10. Anonymous12:10

      Unlikely they will require D check as they are planned to arrive in May.

      Delete
    11. Anonymous17:32

      They are coming from storage, they used to fly for EY. They won't fly in may or June. Not realistic.

      Delete
    12. Anonymous17:33

      They are not coming from EY. Stop making things up

      Delete
  4. Anonymous09:05

    Congratulations!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous09:08

    Fantastic performance. By far the best airline in the region. Biggest downside: failure to commit to launch service to Canada.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:59

      Yes! Been waiting for Toronto for a long time so I don't have to connect anymore!

      Delete
  6. Anonymous09:11

    Well I'm glad they own up to operational issues this summer and at least in principal say they will try to avoid it this year.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous09:13

    Between this and next week i expect news about new destinations. Last year 23 January announced last destinations.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:46

      They should really schedule those new flights soon if they plan to get some bookings. It's practically February already.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:33

      I think it is better to focus this year on operating their schedule better than last year, with fewer delays and cancelations.
      Get more pilots and flight attendants in and reduce the dependence on wet leases.
      After that they should increase frequencies on existing destinations and then start expanding on new markets again.

      Just my2cents.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous16:36

      @10:33

      You've missed some news it looks like it.

      They had an excess in flight attendants last summer, not a shortage. Another cabin crew recruitment drive was completed last month. A pilot open day was held in December in Belgrade. The largest upgrade of Captains in decades happened late last year with more to follow.

      Wet leases are there in part due to the inability to source dry leases and not due to staff shortages. The numerous issues with newer technology aircraft doesn't help, and new issues and groundings of the 737Max is just making a bad situation worse. Ordering new aircraft isn't exactly a solution if they will end up being grounded or delayed. Ryan Air in the last quarter of 2023 expected 27 deliveries but ended up recieving 14, just to give an example.

      Frequencies to over 40 destinations this winter were boosted and more to come for the upcoming summer season. Just in the ex YU region ZAG and LJU are seeing 3 daily rotations which wasn't there in the summer. In November they added additional frequencies to CFU, PMI and BCN for the upcoming summer season. The summer schedule isn't final as of yet so expect to see more destinations added to that list. To say they haven't done anything to improve frequencies is far from the truth.

      Delete
  8. Anonymous09:15

    Any idea what the load factor was?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:11

      4190000/45000 = 93 passengers on average per flight. Working out load factor will be a bit more complicated.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:21

      seat offered/ total passenger should give you the load factor.

      Delete
  9. Anonymous09:17

    wow congratulations!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous09:18

    JUtastic.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous09:24

    It would be interesting to see which route makes them the most money.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:19

      My guess would be New York and Moscow this year.

      Delete
  12. Anonymous09:30

    If they had flights to PRN the number would have been significantly higher. Also, if they had that 3rd wide-body it would have been a lot more.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:32

      If they had 10 more aircraft it would be more, if they had 40 more destinations, it would be significantly more.

      Delete
    2. Nemjee10:19

      If they had a better marketing strategy they would have more flights, capacity and passengers to places like BUD, OTP, SOF... which have more potential than PRN.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous11:56

      PRN is not up to them as we all know. Strictly business-wise they would have already flied there for years.

      Delete
    4. ^Of course they would have been flying to PRN if political reasons weren't an issue.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous18:41

      Flied... OMG!!!

      Delete
  13. Anonymous09:31

    Brilliant results. Do we know how much was their total revenue in 2023?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:32

      Over half a billion EUR

      Delete
  14. Anonymous09:32

    Hopefully an even better 2024.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous09:33

    Good job JU

    ReplyDelete
  16. Anonymous09:33

    I am more than confident that the airline will reach 5 million this year.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anonymous09:35

    Well done :)

    ReplyDelete
  18. Anonymous09:35

    I think the main thing they need to do in 2024 is expand their fleet. They will definitely need more capacity.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:42

      Its already announced that 3 AT7's, 2 A330s and 3 A320s will join the fleet

      Delete
    2. ilijabgc10:07

      They have recently announced that 3 ATR will come soon as 2 A332 in May.
      The A320 should come soon

      Delete
  19. Anonymous09:42

    Passenger growth is impressive.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Anonymous09:43

    Great to see an ex YU carrier thrive and be proactive.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Anonymous09:43

    Congratulations Air Serbia. It has been a very busy year.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Anonymous09:43

    They still need a bit more to go before overtaking JAT's 1987 result - 4.531.000 passengers.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Anonymous09:43

    @ex yu

    When are BEG numbers for 2023 going to be published?

    ReplyDelete
  24. Great news. Great how much Marek has achieved.
    If they can grow so much looking for 8 million by 2030.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nemjee10:20

      One man can not achieve 8 million passengers. It's impressive what JU employees have done to make this growth a reality.

      Delete
    2. Yes the employees that contributed worked hard. But they still needed the person in charge to put them on that path to success. If it wasn't for him those same employees could still be working there but achieve the same as OU and FB.

      Delete
    3. Nemjee13:34

      JU was nowhere near OU or FB when Marek took over. Air Serbia existed before him and it will exist once he leaves. He had a few positive moves but their commercial strategy is where he failed in his leadership, not to mention the operational disaster they went through last summer and even partly this winter.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous16:31

      When you look at this regions airline CEO's track records past and present, I think Air Serbia is very lucky to have Marek as their CEO. It also helps that the Serbian government has a positive plan for Air Serbia too with a big focus on growth.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous17:39

      Sure lol. Interesting how this growth started when Marek became CCO. I guess the government told them not to grow before that. Some people here.

      Delete
  25. Anonymous09:45

    Hope it continues in 2024.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:55

      Based on their current announcements, it will.

      Delete
  26. Anonymous09:46

    Looking at those results by year, 2018 looked really bleak for Air Serbia. How things have changed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:47

      That year of consolidation was obviously needed in order to sustain the growth we have today.

      Delete
  27. Anonymous09:48

    Lots of great work has been done at JU in recent years and I think the airline is well set up to exploit several key opportunities and grow and make BEG into a decent hub for the region.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Anonymous09:48

    Waiting for announcement of new destinations

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:55

      Same!

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:56

      Mostar, Shanghai and Guangzhou are already known. Some mentioned that Zakynthos will become a scheduled destination.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous10:00

      Zakynthos would be a bit stupid considering Wizz is already operating the route.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous12:57

      Mykonos is a must

      Delete
    5. Anonymous16:00

      Wroclaw and Cluj-Napoca is likely as well on the ATR. A return to HEL would be great now that the ERJ's are in the fleet. KIV on the ATR could come seeing as they wanted to launch the route in 2020.

      Delete
  29. Anonymous09:55

    Basically if JU was an ex-YU airport they would rank second behind BEG.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:00

      Who compares airlines and airports?

      Delete
    2. Anonymous17:35

      I do.

      Delete
  30. Anonymous09:58

    Good job JU... regardless of anything people say on here it has been a huge transformation for the better in the last 2-3 years.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Anonymous10:30

    If they would fly on time there would be more passengers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:36

      Yes, because these figures are really terrible. Some people on here.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous13:55

      @10:36 nobody said that figures are terrible / good or bad but the guy above is absolutely correct. I myself avoid flying them because they are never on time and I hate waiting 1-2-3 hrs at airports so if for relatively the same price I can fly TK or KL or something similar I take that over Air Serbija. So yes fully agree that if they were more punctual they would have potentially even more passengers to serve.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous15:17

      Да ли Ви знате да је ТК отказао два јутарња лета 17.12.2023. из Тбилисија због магле? Сви остали, укључујући и Пегусус, су полетели са закашњењем, мањим или већим. Помињем Пегасус, јер је његов лет био као и мој отказани лет некако у исто време. Тај лет Пегасуса је каснио око 45 минута. Ја сам имао везани лет за БЕГ који је слетео у БЕГ у 8:00. Да ли је то била грешка ТК? У принципу, не. Да је полетео касније, вероватно бих закаснио на лет за БЕГ.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous17:37

      Каква је била попуњеност на лету из и за Београд?

      Delete
    5. Anonymous10:32

      Био је пун.

      Delete
  32. Anonymous11:12

    1,5 m passangers added YoY that's great result.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Anonymous11:14

    Nicely done Air Serbia ! Even better results for 2024 , from a customer of yours from Greece .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:56

      Love Air Serbia from Greece too !

      Delete
  34. Anonymous12:04

    Switzerland is No.7 with only one airport served by JU in 2023. It's the only single-destination country in Top 10 and without codeshare with main player at that airport. I guess it has to be high yield destination too. Extremly important market for Air Serbia.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:06

      Agree. But dissapoiniting JU dumps a lot of its wet leased capacity on the Zurich route leading to lots of prooduct inconsistency and inability to buy business class tickets.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous12:11

      Yes, they fly everything there and you never know which ac will be used for your flight. On the other hand, people don't mind. Those 272.200 people at least.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous12:12

      That's capacity, not passenger numbers. Still large for a single route.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous12:14

      True that, my bad. But I guess the loads have to be good with so many flights/seats scheduled...

      Delete
    5. Anonymous13:22

      Result is good. In my opinion they have to try season routes all year round, not a month and a half during winter like Salzburg, Cologne, Naples, Izmir, Ankara, etc. If somebody says Split during winter somebody says no. In general, Belgrade has less pax than Heraklion (8.5 million). The whole of Croatia pax levels the whole of Crete (11 million).

      Delete
    6. @13.22
      I am very critical about aviation in ex-yu and its development levels, and I think it could be much much better, especially in Croatia, but in all other ex republics as well, but please, you can't compare an island closer to Africa than to Europe with countries in Central part of european mainland. It simply makes difference.

      Delete
    7. Anonymous16:15

      @13:22

      If demand isn't there for more flights there isn't much they can do. JU has tried twice to add more flights to SZG over the winter months, a month and a half of winter flying is all that is working for now. I believe SZG has had some slight improvement in flights operated this winter compared to last winter. It's better than nothing.

      SPU and DBV is something they at least need to start earlier in the season and not late May. Many airlines start their seasonal operations to both airport from early April. Both airports have some form of O&D demand plus JU has a more than decent network via BEG to connect pax.

      Delete
    8. Anonymous17:39

      Swiss is going crazy in Belgrade right now. They keep on sending A320/321 every day. Admin so you have their numbers?

      Delete
  35. Anonymous13:17

    'handles' or 'mishandles'? very good question m

    ReplyDelete
  36. Anonymous15:35

    As Greek and frequent traveller to Serbia im pleased to see Air Serbia growing up year by year .. keep up the good work boys!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:01

      More flights to Athens needed tho Aegean lacks in BEG-ATH in comparison to JU.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous16:39

      Aegean's service and inflight experience is godlike though compared to JU. Aegean is one of the best in Europe

      Delete
    3. Anonymous17:04

      Of course Aegean is one of the best in Europe , and I think both airlines have good times on P2P . Personaly I travel the one with the cheapest ticket at the days I wanna travel BEG-ATH-BEG.

      Delete
  37. Anonymous16:25

    North America expansion is left for 2025. Chicago route was first mentioned in the media on 13 July 2022 for May 2023 launch.

    In less than six months it will be time to announce what North American 2025 expansion will look like.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Anonymous16:29

    Dodali su 1,5 ml putnika i dalje nastavljaju da rastu. Impresivno. A neki su najavljivali raspad sustava?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:44

      Tako je, neki su najavljivali raspad sustava a njihovi botovi predlagali (bolje receno prizeljkivali) smanjenje ukupnih destinacija na 40-45.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous18:15

      Iskreno "sustav" je bio toliko nategnut da je škripalo na sve strane ali se srećom nije raspao. Nadam se da su naučili lekciju. Isto važi i za BEG/Vinci.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous19:35

      Skripalo je u junu i manje u julu. Tokom ostatka godine je bilo u granicama normale.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous22:30

      JU je sigurno naučila lekciju, novi avioni stižu do maja. Nove destinacije se ne objavljaju verovatno dok ne potpišu ugovore za avione. Imaju sigurne wet lease partnere tako da će predstojeće leto biti mnogo relaksiranije.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous22:50

      VLC ide na 4x. Kapaciteti za Španiju nastavljaju da rastu.

      Delete

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.