Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


JAT's inter-city bus service
Belgrade - Niš, 1980s

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2025/26 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • May28
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Two airlines apply for new subsidised flights to Slovenia

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Two airlines have submitted applications for the launch of subsidised flights to Slovenia, the country’s Ministry for Infrastructure told EX-YU Aviation News. “Currently we are checking whether they fully meet the tender conditions”, it noted. It did not specify which two carriers have applied as part of the recently completed eighth tender aimed at improving the country’s connectivity. Although the subsidy scheme is open to flights to all three of Slovenia’s commercial airports, both applications are believed to target services to Ljubljana, continuing the trend seen with all previous submissions under the program. So far, only 494.376 euros of the allocated 16.8-million-euro subsidy scheme fund has been spent, with Luxair, airBaltic, and Norwegian being the only beneficiaries so far.

Ljubljana Airport has recently said it is targeting new services to Barcelona, Berlin, Prague, Stockholm and Vienna. Only airlines registered and based in the European Common Aviation Area (ECAA) are eligible for the subsidies. The ECAA is made up of states that are part of the European Union, as well as Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Iceland, Macedonia, Norway, Kosovo, and Montenegro. For its part, the Slovenian government is primarily targeting the introduction of flights to Vienna, Copenhagen, Madrid, Prague, Berlin, Rome, Stockholm, Oslo, Barcelona, and Lisbon, although all destinations within the ECAA are eligible.

The Slovenian government is considering revising its airline subsidy program. The Ministry for Infrastructure has indicated that policy changes could follow the adoption of Slovenia’s new aviation law, expected later this year. "The Act on Aid for Ensuring Greater Air Connectivity, on the basis of which the current public tender is being implemented, will apply until October 5, 2025, i.e., until the new Aviation Act (ZLet-1) comes into force. After this date, it will be possible to notify the European Commission of a new financial aid scheme with a duration of up to three years and conduct a new public tender on the basis of ZLet-1, so the Ministry of Infrastructure is considering a possible continuation of the measure”, it said, The Ministry added, “In addition to conducting the public tender, we are also studying options that will improve Slovenia's air connectivity in the long term, as we are aware of the short-term effects of a time-limited public tender. We are open to various forms of cooperation with airlines that would help increase air connectivity in Slovenia in the long term and we are interested in discussing possibilities for cooperation”.


May 06, 2025
Feature Ljubljana slovenia
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:01

    Finally some good news

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:03

      JU for Kraljevo and OU for Dubrovnik :D

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:06

      Definitely not Croatia Airlines

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:01

      Would Kraljevo-Ljubljana have any potential. Considering flights to the much bigger Niš are only twice per week on a small turboprop

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous12:55

      additional weekly departure LJU-INI would be good fri-sun for fly often for diaspora home... without taking holiday

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous05:01

      There is more than sufficient capacity with current schedule.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  2. Anonymous09:03

    Wonder which two it could be.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  3. Anonymous09:03

    Hopefully the ministry does not reject them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:12

      Would not be surprised if they do.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:03

      Only airline they've rejected is Cyprus Airways and they filed incomplete information. The issue lies with the tender rules, not the Ministry playing beer pong to decide whether to reject an airline

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  4. Anonymous09:03

    My guess is Austrian from Vienna and Vueling from Barcelona.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:09

      This would be great

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous05:02

      Don't think it will be either of those but let's see.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  5. Anonymous09:04

    Any guesses on who these two airlines might be?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:10

      Maybe Wizz. There was an article here recently that they held talks with the government and were asking about the subsidy scheme.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:53

      That and we've also seen Fraport in talks with Ryanair on here and mentions of them being in talks over Barcelona and Stockholm at the aviation event awhile ago

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous05:02

      Don't count on it being Ryanair.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  6. Anonymous09:04

    Bravo Fraport!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:05

      Fraport keeps winning!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:06

      That would be a win for Fraport if these flights materialize.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:26

      So sad, considering Fraport has 0 to do with this. Bravo the people of Slovenia, who are footing the bill for this. Not saying I don't support this aid, let's just give credit to whom the credit is due!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  7. Anonymous09:10

    So realistically, these two routes will launch next winter?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:12

      Yes, of the ministry approves it.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:16

      *if

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:53

      Probably next Spring, unless they're routes with winter potential like Malaga

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous05:03

      I'm sure at least one will come this winter.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  8. Anonymous09:11

    At least something

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  9. Anonymous09:11

    I would say that Eurowings is defenitley one for those Berlin flights but the second one could be anyone. Maybe even Wizz as it was previously reported that they were in talks with the government about subsidies.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:35

      Which Wizz route is most likely?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:48

      Probably the return of Luton and Charleroi. But it would be nice to see the likes of Tirana, Bucharest, Rome maybe even Belgrade.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:52

      Its berlin with eurowings and wizz with tirana

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:59

      If true, I think they could make LJU work to TIA like with Skopje.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous10:05

      It's possible Wizz is launching more than 1 route, after all. It says two carriers, not two routes. Charleroi, Bucharest, Tirana, etc. are all open for the tender (Luton afaik isn't cause it's operated by Wizz UK)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous10:15

      Ofc LTN is possible.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous10:19

      How is it possible when the UK is not part of the ECAA?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous10:24

      So if it isn't? You think they only use Wizz Air UK for flights from UK? Check again.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous10:27

      You don't understand. The government will only subsidize flights to destinations within the ECAA. So if Wizz Air applied with Luton route, it will be disqualified, no matter with which AOC it applied with.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous10:48

      @10:15 it's EU subsidising EU-based airlines to ECAA-based airports.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous10:49

      ECAA-based airlines*, my bad

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Anonymous14:13

      Eurowings has already been granted subsidies for Berlin, they just need to launch the flights

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    13. Reply
  10. Anonymous09:13

    Have a feeling one of them is SAS.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  11. Anonymous09:22

    Great to see that airlines are still showing interest in flying to Slovenia

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:19

      Like on life support.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  12. Anonymous09:22

    This whole tender needs to be seriously rethought.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:30

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous05:04

      They plan to do that.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  13. Anonymous09:23

    Fingers crossed for routes to Barcelona and Lisbon!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:30

      One of those is possible. Both highly unlikely.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:02

      Lisbon is very unlikely. The airport is at its capacity limit, so it's unlikely an LCC would use expensive slots on a lower yield route. Barcelona, though, is entirely possible

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  14. Anonymous09:23

    Still almost nothing to show for it after eight tenders.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:29

      Most airlines probably don’t find the incentives worth the hassle.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  15. Anonymous09:34

    Even if someone wanted to fly to Maribor, the airport is still closed! Nuts.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:49

      When do they plan to reopen it?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:22

      Not for another few months at least.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous05:04

      I can't believe it is taking them over a year to fix the roof.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  16. Anonymous09:43

    When will we find out about which two airlines are in question?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  17. Anonymous09:44

    Imagine if it is Ryanair :D

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:46

      Well LJU said it was disappointed Ryanair didn't apply for these subsidies.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  18. Anonymous09:48

    It is funny that the most useful of all the routes launched in the last 3 years is KLM from/to Amsterdam which didn't even apply for these subsidies.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:53

      And they are performing crazy good

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:26

      I'm really hoping they expand operations next year!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous16:05

      they are already selling tickets till end of April 2026.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  19. Anonymous09:55

    I wonder when will Slovenian authorities understand that such interventions to the free market would chase true commercial companies away?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:04

      When will you understand you have no idea what you are talking about?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  20. Anonymous10:23

    Well after several failed tender rounds it is good that at least someone applied. I'm hoping for more than one route from at least one of the two.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:45

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  21. Anonymous11:12

    I remember some 15 yrs ago Jat Airways has been granted rights for BEG-POW and POW-FCO on its AT7 on Fridays and Sundays, subsidized flights by Portoroz TO, aiming for Italian high-class tourists visting casinos in Portoroz. Would be great to employ its AT7 fleet on such a exotic routes... What do you think?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:05

      Problem is that, due to how short the runway at POW is, the ATR would face load restrictions. Normally that was fine, but we're in a phase where planes and pilots are in a shortage and low-cost high-yield leisure routes dominate the market.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous12:50

      Interesting. I actually think JU cancelled those flights before they even launched. I also remember it had to do with gambling tourism. I believe Italians were supposed to go to the casino. It turned into a real mess because Slovenian agents then sued Jat for not honoring the agreement.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  22. Anonymous11:37

    They'd introduce Sarajevo if they were sane

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:49

      Could work well with Wizz but since Wizz does not have a base in either SJJ or LJU it's highly unlikely.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous20:13

      12:49 Exactly! It would have to be done like e.g SKP-SJJ-LJU-SJJ-SKP or BUD-SJJ-LJU-SJJ-BUD, if Wizz Air were to launch it. Wizz Air does W flights already though, so it shouldn't be impossible.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous20:27

      Most likely scenario would be TIA-LJU-X-LJU-TIA, they wouldn't be adjusting the SKP schedule, as it was just adjusted a week ago

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous20:32

      I think we could see something like this, as SKP is offered 4x weekly:

      2x weekly: SKP-LJU-BCN-LJU-SKP
      2x weekly: SKP-LJU-OTP-LJU-SKP
      2x weekly: TIA-LJU-LCA-LJU-TIA

      Maybe it's wishful thinking

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous05:05

      It's plausible

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous08:17

      20:27 That's possible as well. I just wrote that if Wizz Air launched SKP-SJJ and/or BUD-SJJ, it could be used for SJJ-LJU W-flights as well. It could also be the other way around by doing TIA-LJU-SJJ-LJU-TIA.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
  23. Anonymous12:49

    Can't wait to find out which ones

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  24. Anonymous12:53

    Anyone remember what was the deadline date for the eighth tender?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:56

      14 April

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous12:58

      Thanks. So that means that we will probably find out the two airlines next week.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous14:07

      Fingers crossed.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  25. Anonymous12:59

    reanimate MBX Ljubljana-Maribor airport for low cost carriers

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14:07

      Not too many LCCs flying to LJU so I don't think they would rush for MBX.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  26. Anonymous12:59

    TAP Air Portugal to Lisbon.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:09

      Would be nice but doubtful

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous14:04

      If Iberia flies MAD for a month a year, I highly doubt TAP will start flights.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  27. Anonymous13:32

    AirBaltic had LPA-LJU listed as a direct route, it has since been removed

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14:04

      That would be fantastic and would work this winter

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous14:10

      it will happen in winter but not as part of subs ...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous14:11

      This would be amazing!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous15:58

      Do you know any more ex LPA routes that were briefly listed?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous16:09

      No, Ljubljana was the only one

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous17:09

      Yes, LPA is starting in W, they applied for subsidies.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous17:20

      What would the frequencies be?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous18:29

      Though there is absolutely no chance of happening this way, ideal would be 2pw with routing lpa - tfn - lju - tfn - lpa

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous18:34

      They have a base at LPA, hard to belive they wouldn't use it and opt for W flights instead. W flights would be only good for LPA-LJU-X-LJU-LPA flights.

      If they add Berlin or even Barcelona instead of the "x" destination... Then we are talking about maybe a testbed for a mini base in Ljubljana

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous20:18

      This kind of rotation would be much more likely but from catchment point the route would have much bigger pool if Tenerife bound passangers and the diaspora there could also use the route

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous20:26

      I think most likely the LPA route would be offered to tour operators as well, which would make a lot of sense. If that is the case, we could see the route being 2x weekly from October till the end of May

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Anonymous21:21

      For sure TO would be one segment, this in mind it would generate much more demand if it would include also Tenerife, the most popular amongst Slovenes even if this would meen 20-30 eur higher average ticket price to cover the cost of tfn/tfs - lpa segment flying half empty and double landing/ground handling cost

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    13. Anonymous22:29

      Everything can be arranged, although I think that LPA-LJU-TFN-LJU-LPA would then be run, as TO would most likely fill their A220s by themselves

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    14. Anonymous23:06

      I doubt there is enough demand to fill 300 seats per week on each of the two islands but if you split this in half you manage to maintain double weekly frequency with 150 seats per Island weekly or 75 seats per rotation which would basically equal using atr 72 or crj 700 but with better seat cost and here you get the advantage vs classic lcc with rigid point to point and 190 seats to fill model 🙂

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    15. Reply
  28. Anonymous12:32

    Delo is reporting LPA and TIA

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:55

      Amazing - finally Canaries 🙂

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


JAT's inter-city bus service
Belgrade - Niš, 1980s

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Croatia Airlines posts heavy losses and negative equity

Image

Ljubljana tipped for new Tirana and Las Palmas service

Image

Air Serbia to add more A320s to fleet

Image

Belgrade Airport city rail link work advances

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025