Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


First JAT B727 on the
production line, 1974

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus GP Aviation Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Results 2026 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 Summer 2027 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2026/2027 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • March74
  • February77
  • January85
  • December89
  • November77
  • October84
  • September81
  • August80
  • July85
  • June80
  • May83
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Croatia Airlines discontinues two additional routes

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Croatia Airlines is continuing to adjust its network, with a further two routes set to be discontinued this coming summer. The carrier will end operations from Zagreb to both Milan Malpensa and Bucharest, bringing the total number of discontinued services in its network this summer to five. Croatia Airlines introduced flights to Italy’s second largest city and Romania’s capital last July on a seasonal basis, with both routes operating three times per week. They were due to resume on May 11 and June 2 respecticely. The Croatian carrier faced indirect competition on the Milan route, where Ryanair serves nearby Bergamo Airport, while it remained the sole operator on the Bucharest service.

Croatia Airlines will also extend reduced frequencies on its Zagreb services to both Sarajevo and Skopje into the 2026 summer season. On the Sarajevo route, the airline will operate an average of ten weekly flights in April, twelve in May and eleven in June, down from thirteen weekly services maintained throughout the previous summer. Frequencies are set to be restored to thirteen per week from July. On the Zagreb - Skopje route, frequencies will decrease to an average of six weekly in April and seven in May, compared to nine weekly rotations last summer. Services are expected to return to nine weekly from June.

As a result of its latest network decision, Croatia Airlines will withdraw from the Romanian market, having also discontinued services from Split to Bucharest. The carrier has previously announced the termination of its seasonal Split - Skopje service, as well as Split - Amsterdam. The airline continues to maintain its presence in Italy with flights from Zagreb to Rome operated via either Split or Dubrovnik. The network adjustments come as Croatia Airlines transition to an all-Airbus A220 fleet, taking delivery of its eighth of fifteen A220s earlier this month.


March 27, 2026
croatia croatia airlines Feature Summer 2026 zagreb
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous10:17

    Week OU

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:06

      Another round of cuts… hard to see where Croatia Airlines is actually growing apart from fleet renewal.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:24

      What to say for Malev, Adria.... Jasmin fight like a lion to save the company from bankruptcy. Survive in such LCC environment is magic! You will see, how long Montenegro Airlines will exist.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous12:30

      Montenegro Airlines is profitable while OU isn't.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous13:08

      Similar strategy that Boštjančič (now Slovenian minister of finance) implemented in Adria in 2011, when Adria canceled some routes and frequencies and never really recovered. It was start of the end (of course he would claim that he solved the company from immediate bankruptcy, which is also true, but shrinking was only short term solution without long term perspective). I would suggest to our Croatian friends not to repeat the same mistake.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  2. Anonymous10:17

    This has got to be one of the worst executed "turnaround strategies" in a long time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:28

      It also shows that most routes they launched last summer are a complete miss. Almost all of them are already gone.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:34

      Most of these routes can't work on an A220. That's why they are disappearing.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:39

      What can Milan work on? Milan is the perfect A220 route. It economics are much better than the old A320s of Lauda

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous12:15

      Malpensa is almost as far away as Bergamo, and Ryanair prices were much more competitive.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous13:47

      No, Milan is the perfect Dash route. Ryanair flies almost daily with 20 euro flight prices. Bergamo is as far away from Milan as Malpensa. Croatia Airlines had weak frequencies, weak connections, and so it stood not chance.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  3. Anonymous10:18

    I'm sorry if as a European legacy carrier you can't make Milan work, what is there to say....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:24

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:06

      Milan makes sense honestly. Bergamo is cheaper and Ryanair dominates that market anyway.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:07

      Bucharest is more surprising. No competition and still couldn’t make it work?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous11:25

      Why?? Ryan flies there. Country has little more than 3 million people.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous11:29

      Let's give them some time that they find new excuse for Bucharest.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous12:16

      The competition is double daily from BEG and also OS/LH.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous12:17

      Milano doesn't have any sense for OU.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous12:26

      @anon 12:17
      Are you for real?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous12:43

      They don't even fly to FCO non stop. This airline is a shambles.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. PIR13:58

      During ex-yu times, JAT operated up to daily Zagreb to Milano vv. Usually on DC-9, over some periods even on B727. Despite several US carriers and Alitalia operating multiple US destinations from Milano, and despite no commercial right to sell one stop/transfer tickets between Italy and the US, good portion of passengers on Zagreb-Milano vv flights were Italian/US passengers transferring in ZAG to/from JAT New York and Chicago flights, flying on two separate tickets, with perfect short and smooth transit. And today, with Buzin experts and their Središnjica Masters who totally destroyed OU and ruined all chances and potentials of the (now european) market with no administrative obstacles, it's something we can just remember instead living it again, triple stronger

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous16:28

      Bro I dont want to write here, where Jat flew in the past from Belgrade.. it doesnt make sense now. Different time, smaller market, stronger competition.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Anonymous16:43

      Anon 12:26
      Yes, I'm for real.

      PIR

      Sure man, people from Milano were transfering via JAT 🤣

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    13. Anonymous17:05

      Comparing JAT era with 2026.....
      The original JAT ended in 1991 with Yugoslavia.RIP.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    14. PIR17:23

      16.43
      You can smile as much as you wish. You are probably one of those who believe we had one type of yoghurt in Yugoslavia. Not only Milan to US, passengers from Greece, Turkey, Egypt, Middle East were transferring in BEG for North America with JAT, Italians and French for Bangkok, Germans to China, passengers from UK to Singapore and Australia, North Africans to UK and Scandinavia, and many more. JAT had charters to Tahiti, Cuba, Korea, Vancouver, San Francisco...When JAT had 36 aircraft the, Emirates had 8. Turkish and Austrian did not operate long-haul. JAT was the only airline flying between Dubai and China, and along with KLM one of two connecting Dubai with Australia. It was the only european airline with scheduled traffic to Cleveland. Once again, you can cry out all your smiling tears, but it will not change the fact that JAT 1985-1990 was big, important, relevant, recognizable, market oriented, self sustaining and profitable airline, wellknown around the World

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    15. PIR17:30

      17.05
      It's not exactly comparison. It's strong criticism of OU, which despite huuuuge overall growth of civil aviation worldwide is not capable being even on the aviation levels from 40 or 50 years ago.
      Instead is much lower, and going lower and lower. While all others grow and improve. It's not so difficult to understand, unless you write from Buzin

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    16. Anonymous18:39

      Some win, some lose. That's life, and every era has its rules. Croatia Airlines will survive no more than CSA, Malev, Adria, etc. Back in the days of Jat, TWA and Pan Am also flew there; all history now.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    17. PIR18:56

      18.39
      Of course, every era has its rules. Of course, some win some lose. And according to what you have just said, and according to its results, at the moment, Croatia Airlines does belong to CSA, Malev, Adria etc. group. But there is another group, where Aegean, Air Baltic, Air Serbia, Finnair, TAP etc are. I want Croatia Airlines to join that group, and pointing out why it is not in that group and what it has to do and change to join that group. Which has nothing to do with an era and with its rules

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    18. Anonymous20:38

      With OU being run by the government it has no chance to develop.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    19. PIR21:36

      Absolutely agree. Just small addition: OU is being run by government and Mafia combined, hand by hand

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    20. Anonymous22:21

      There is no market in Croatia to support such megalomaniac ideas without heavy state aid.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    21. Anonymous22:21

      Finnair and TAP are comparable to the case of Croatia Airlines? Sure hahahah

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    22. Anonymous22:23

      @22.21 OU already gets heavy state aid to discontinue routes.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    23. PIR23:46

      22.21
      Croatia Airlines has 13 % market share. With 25-30 aircraft, and increased LF, that share could go up to 30-35 %. Unlike you, I give you numbers. Numbers which clearly show that THERE IS MARKET, which Croatia Airlines as it is, is not capable to exploit. And only totally ignorant and/or mean people can claim opposite

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    24. PIR23:52

      2nd 22.21
      Finland has about 5 million inhabitants. Almost no tourism except for Santa over Xmass. Almost no diaspora. Portugal is not much bigger and not much richer than Croatia. Therefore both are totally comparable and that's preciseley why I listed those two and not SAS and Iberia, just to remain in vicinity, geographically

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    25. Anonymous00:39

      Finland has much higher standard of living, second much bigger country with much larger population and close St Petersburg, city with 2 times more people than Croatia. Lol Portugal was colonial superpower, and 30 million Portuguese lives only in Brasil.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    26. Reply
  4. Anonymous10:22

    This only means the Q1 results are catastrophic.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:35

      Most likely. On top of it being their worst quarter in general there is also the rise in fuel prices.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:29

      Not only for them fuel got more expensive.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous12:50

      Fuel is the excuse for Q2. Q1 was not affected much by it.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous20:39

      Did OU have any money to hedge fuel prices?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  5. Anonymous10:24

    This airline is a disaster.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:11

      The airline is not a desaster- its management may be.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous15:22

      An airline is only as good as how its managed mate.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  6. Anonymous10:24

    The A220s will solve everything....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:43

      Jasmin B in action.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:50

      Jasmin did not buy A220. It was ordered by the government.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous13:49

      He could have resigned.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. PIR14:08

      Uhljebs and aparatchiks don't resign. They obediently fulfill their Master's orders. That's why they are there after all

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  7. Anonymous10:25

    They don't care. The government just gave them millions due to fantastic management and Jasmin is preparing for acting ceo post.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:27

      That is exactly the attitude they have.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  8. Anonymous10:26

    More to come probably.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:25

      New lines are coming.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:30

      Where? In Australia?
      Possible.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. PIR17:31

      11.25
      To Minken and Vrankvurt

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous18:39

      And to Reka

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. PIR19:04

      Reka to Minken is operated by OU. Twice weekly. In the middle of the day. While hundreds of people from Rijeka and its region fly out every day from Zagreb, Pula, Ljubljana, Trieste, Venice, Treviso. Which clearly shows capacity of the third floor in Buzin. Thanks for giving me idea to comment on this one as well 🙂

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous22:22

      Only airlines as retarded as OU can operate something stupid like flights to Rijeka while their hub is 2h away.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous22:22

      Only airlines as retarded as OU can operate something stupid like flights to Rijeka while their hub is 2h away.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous00:03

      Very good to know TAP is retarded operating from Lisbon and Porto. Or THY from IST and Sabiha. Or even Air Serbia from Belgrade and Niš.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Reply
  9. Anonymous10:27

    What on earth are they going to do with all the planes they have?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:29

      Wet-lease to Lufti is always an option

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:29

      ^ this will most likely happen.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:32

      That will make them more money than any new route.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:36

      Can you lease the already leased planes and how is it financialy viable?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous10:57

      Yes, but you need to have good manager and finance team.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  10. Anonymous10:28

    Honestly while the airline is a disaster this is a good move, better than to pile on more losses from these routes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:29

      But at the end of the day they will have losses anyway. I doubt they will turn profitable because of this.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:31

      They will not turn profitable but losses will reduce. They need to optimise their network asap.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:33

      But what was the point in launching all of these last year in the first place?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:40

      These were a miss but Hamburg, Berlin and Stockholm aren't while Madrid I don't know. They need more feeding routes and some of the most underserved routes from Zagreb

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  11. Anonymous10:33

    Wasn't the A220 meant to make routes like these work?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:34

      I think they mostly used Q400 and A319 on these routes last year. But this year they had A220 planned.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  12. Anonymous10:34

    I am so disappointed in this airline. Croatia as a country deserved a better flag carrier.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:36

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:27

      This is the maximum. Jasmin Lion knows that. You mean that OU beat LCC? Dont be funny

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  13. Anonymous10:36

    The only thing that can save this airline is if they revert to an airbaltic model. Wet lease more than half of the fleet and keep the couple of profitable routes you have.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous20:41

      Which routes are profitable?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous00:05

      As far as I know, Amsterdam only

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  14. Anonymous10:36

    This is hilarious. Why even go through the whole transition phase if at the end you operate the same routes with lower frequency and with a metal you need to pay for?!?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  15. Anonymous10:40

    They are going to end up with one airplane per route soon

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  16. Anonymous10:45

    Disappointing

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  17. Anonymous10:46

    I'm afraid it won't be a great year for ZAG either but I'm guessing the concessionaire is more than happy with that. No need for activating old terminal or expanding current one.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:46

      I doubt these routes had a high load factor so I don't think it will impact ZAG much.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:50

      Exactly, I think Tel Aviv and higher loads on other routes should be the enough. It dosent mean much but since the Middle East war my family has counted as at least 20 extra pax

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:05

      Will TLV even go ahead?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  18. Anonymous11:07

    Feels like they launch routes just to cancel them a year later. Not a great strategy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  19. Anonymous11:07

    All this talk about the A220 transformation but network keeps shrinking.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:10

      It is still bigger than last year.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:56

      How exactly? Discontinued 5 routes, launched 2. Net loss of 3 routes.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. PIR14:01

      Ouch

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  20. Anonymous11:09

    Wow... a friend of mine booked this service! Family of 5, Milan to Dubrovnik via Zagreb!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:14

      How else should he fly the route?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous13:16

      Via BEG

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous13:34

      OU was actually good option for him. LCC leave early which meant he would have had to get his kids up a 2 to 3 am.

      If they now re-book via another Star hub he will lose an entire day to travel. Haven't asked him yet but will ask soon if they reached out to him

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous13:50

      BEG is not a good option because of passport control and bad timings.

      The best option is ITA via Rome.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous13:51

      ITA does not fly to Dubrovnik.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous14:51

      Probably will....
      LHG is reshuffling it's southern flank.
      Croatia and ITA need to have integrated schedules in Star Alliance.
      Malpensa should be changed for Linate to take advantage of ITA presence there.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous15:24

      13:50 transfering is very fast in BG

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous18:05

      No on is forcing Starr Alliance to have integrated schedules and members are independent. But LHG is now working on the integration of the group schedule and members of the LHG are loosing their schedule independent. As ITA is a new member we can expect a lot of integration alignment.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous18:32

      they are already in the LH system

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous18:57

      @13:50

      EU citizens enter Serbia with ID cards so no passport needed. For Schengen to Schengen via BEG transit it really isn't a complicated process, you still need ID to travel either way.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Reply
  21. Anonymous11:22

    haha I was joking this morning in the last post, and they really canceled more routes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:29

      Haha, he read posts and make decisions after reading. 100%

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous13:11

      You gave him an excellent idea!
      I am sure he wouldn't have come to that conclusion by himself! 🤣

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous00:48

      Jasmin B Lion knows what is the best for OU. OU exists and keep working. He read every article here and listens what is the best for OU, like idea to close two lines. He can close one more line in summer and one more in winter.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  22. PIR11:55

    BRAVO HRVATSKA!!!!
    You have the best airline in the World with the best, the cheapest and for the market the most suitable Intergalactic Spaceship, bright and shiny single type fleet, and your management is consisted of pure aviation magicians, ultra top notch professionals, and the best experts available Worldwide. And not only network development and marketing, your financial results are also stellar. You are simply brilliant!!!
    You are the airline that makes me proud being croatian national!!!!
    Thank you!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:25

      Its HZ that really makes me proud!!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous16:34

      Agree. Great airline. 10 times beter than Tarom from 7 times bigger state. Ypu should be proud and realistic

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous17:47

      16.34
      I agree as well. Only Tarom in entire Europe has management so incompetent and is so corrupt as Croatia Airlines. Ex-yu region, potential passenger pool for OU, is approximately size of Romania. Tourism in Croatia and Romania, the second pool, can't be compared. In favour of Croatia. Especially from distant markets. I like bots and uhljebs who pick one single bad, the worst airline, saying we should be happy we are equally bad or the worst. It's preciseley state of mind that keeps us at the bottom of Europe, not only in aviation. State of mind bots and uhljebs are proud of, realistically

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. PIR17:47

      Me above

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous21:41

      17.47 Include Bulgaria air in that list too. That airline is owned by company linked to one of the mafia circles in Bg. Plus, they haven’t gone bankrupt mainly due to their wet leases to Condor during summer and some tour agencies charters to south Asia during the winter. Their main scheduled services are to Paris, Ams,Varna, Ath, Ber. Almost 15 planes for such amount of routes is just not sustainable. Unless they wet lease, like they do…

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  23. Anonymous11:56

    Sarajevo and Skopje cuts show demand is still there but they’re struggling with capacity planning.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:41

      A220 is big mistake for them, they should have smaller planes for non demands months....they are working with loss and government payes for them

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  24. Anonymous11:56

    And the funny thing, the Middle East war will drive capacity to Croatia. The only thing is it will be captured by foreign carriers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  25. Anonymous11:57

    Maybe they are focusing too much on aircraft renewal and not enough on network development.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  26. Anonymous12:07

    The saga continues

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:10

      it won't lasting long.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  27. Anonymous12:08

    And all these routes were supposed to be extended this year

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  28. Anonymous12:49

    until 2 years ago I could fly MUC-SKP-MUC daily (even double daily on some days) now I have a connection only on 4 days.

    CPH-SKP-CPH and LHR-SKP-LHR work only on two days (for the rest of the week OUs webpage is offering 2-stop options via VIE, BRU etc.) Thats how you loose transfer pax

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:09

      Why don't you take JU?
      Much better flying network & connections and much better prices.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous13:10

      Of course that I meant on CPH and LHR.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous13:43

      Thats why from what I dont have from SKP I am using BEG as connection point, cheaper , affordable and convinient option. I stop using OU two years ago. They just cuts and reducing routes

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. PIR14:04

      You think they care? Small tooth cattle will pay for their losses anyhow

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous14:58

      @13.09 JU is not flying to MUC. Out of curiousity i looked for connections to some other destinations that are missing from SKP (like CPH or LHR) and was surprised

      OS is the best one right now when it comes to MUC-SKP-MUC

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous15:27

      Flying Skopje-Zagreb-Munch sounds like a pain.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous16:41

      no it doesnt

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous17:11

      Well clearly it is becoming harder.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Reply
  29. Anonymous16:31

    I always get annoyed for no reason when reading articles like this. OU has very poor management and that's where the story begins and ends. These people are simply not competent for the job. Unfortunately, it goes on and on... They are canceling the seasonal Split - Amsterdam route, but KLM can fill up to 3 daily flights in the season. And KLM is not an LCC. If you have incompetent management, then you lose to both LCCs and LCs. KLM has two full Embraers from Zagreb to Schiphol every day out of season, but OU barely fills one. There are so many bad assessments and decisions that it hurts your head. PIR keeps writing that they are an ordinary feeder. Well, they are not even a good feeder. If they were a good feeder, then they would take over the flights from Zagreb to Munich and Frankfurt, which are normally flown by Lufthansa. I read that Zagreb did not get the headquarters of the European Customs Agency. No surprise. Many people from all over the EU work in such agencies and one of the important conditions for getting a headquarters is good transport connections. How will some people go home from Zagreb on Friday, for example, to Lyon and back on Sunday? Zagreb Airport is a provincial airport, mostly thanks to a poor national carrier that has no strategy and has not managed to make Zagreb a true hub with a wide network of destinations.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:40

      Be real. Zagreb ix small city surrounded by Vienna and Budapest. Counrty with little more than 3 million people!!! OU has grrat managmemt making OU to survine with LCC. Maybe OU can beat Ryan??? Dont make me laugh. Small market, small demand and taht is reallity. Otherwise, in Zag you would have numerous other legacy carriers. So all of tjem have bad managment, right?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous17:10

      Zagreb is not such a small city. Besides, it is the capital. There are many smaller cities that are not tourist destinations, and they have many more passengers than Zagreb. Zagreb is on a par with, for example, Wroclaw. Much worse than Eindhoven, from which you have an excellent train connection to the huge Schiphol. Riga, Katowice, Gdansk are much better. Krakow is the size of Zagreb and is not the capital, and it has almost 3 times more passengers. Pisa, which has several times fewer inhabitants than Zagreb, has 20% more passengers at the airport. I won't go on.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous17:13

      Surrounded by Vienna and Budapest when both cities are 4 hours away by car lol

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous17:34

      From Krakow to Warsaw is a 3-hour drive. Warsaw airport is on par with Schwechat and much stronger than Budapest. From Eindhoven to Schiphol with excellent trains you can get there in an hour and a half, you don't even need a car. From Pisa to Milan is a 3-and-a-half-hour drive, and to Rome a little less than 4 hours. So, your "arguments" are just an excuse for someone's incompetence.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous23:37

      Good point 17:34. With Pisa you also have Florence and Bologna near-by.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  30. Anonymous18:03

    Why don't OU strengthen their presence on the German market? Düsseldorf or Cologne/Bonn would for sure make sense. Adding another destination in Scandinavia is worth considering too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous19:07

      Are you for real? They operate 10 or 11 daily flights to Germany

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous19:52

      ^ Germany is not Frankfurt and Munich only.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous20:01

      They fly to Hamburg and Berlin as well. And yes, Stuttgart and Dusseldorf could be added. But, hey, com'n, it's too early 🙂

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  31. Anonymous20:56

    They surely have to start something from Ljubljana now? Or wet lease in the summer already

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mario21:15

      Ljubljana-Dubrovnik would be great, but sometimes I think they don't like good ideas. The moment they started to fly to Milan and Bucharest I knew they will fail on these destinations. Everbody who travels to Milan from Zagreb takes the car. It's sad but unfortunately nobody in Croatia is interested in traveling to Bucharest or Romania in general. There is also not much business travel between these cities.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous22:23

      Maybe they are one of the four applicants in the newest Slovenian tender. But then again, that would be too smart of them ...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous00:06

      And too early 🙂

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  32. Anonymous21:46

    So OU's most eastern route is Skopje again?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous21:53

      I think they fly from Split aaaalll the way to Istanbul

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


First JAT B727 on the
production line, 1974

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Qatar Airways extends Zagreb and Belgrade service suspension

Image

New Ljubljana routes expected next week

Image

Wizz Air to suspend new Skopje and Tuzla route

Image

Flydubai suspends Ljubljana, reduces other EX-YU routes

Image

Airbus pitches A220 for Air Serbia fleet renewal

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2026