Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


Zagreb Airport, 1968

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus GP Aviation Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Results 2026 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 Summer 2027 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2026/2027 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • April25
  • March83
  • February77
  • January85
  • December89
  • November77
  • October84
  • September81
  • August80
  • July85
  • June80
  • May83
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


airBaltic makes only successful bid for Slovenia subsidies

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps
NEWS FLASH


airBaltic was the only successful bidder in Slovenia’s tenth public tender for the launch of new routes in exchange for state subsidies, the country’s Ministry of Infrastructure has confirmed to EX-YU Aviation News. The bid includes the planned introduction of flights between Tenerife and Ljubljana, set to launch during the upcoming winter season, as well as the extension of the airline’s existing winter service between Gran Canaria and the Slovenian capital.

A total of four applications were submitted as part of the tender process. The tenth call features two application deadlines, with the first now concluded, while the second is scheduled for August 31.

April 08, 2026
Ljubljana slovenia Winter 2026/2027
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous11:46

    Moneys for guys on holiday not for Vienna, Berlin, Stockholm, Bucharest, Dublin.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:57

      Well, according to some people here the government should spend even tens of millions of Euros every year subsidizing LCCs to connect LJU with Bari, Catania, Malaga, Kos, Rhodos, Antalya etc. For the businessmen of course, who will bring billions to Slovenia.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous12:09

      Once a week to these places would save Adria not Pristina and Skopje. But it is long gone.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous12:29

      Tell me you don't know anything about airline economics without telling me you don't know anything about airline economics.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous14:33

      Tell me airline manager.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous19:04

      Yes. 11:57 absolutely. This is how airports in Europe work perfectly while we are increasingly left behind. Not everyone wants to holiday in HR and those places bring tourists too. Or don’t we want their money anymore?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  2. Anonymous11:51

    I have a feeling this was only to create a pre election fuss, otherwise other applicants would probably go public as well?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:11

      200 people in total care about this in Slovenia. Others know nothing about aviation and also don't care about it.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  3. Anonymous11:52

    Is airBaltic still planning Tenerife to be two weekly? The service is so far still only scheduled once per week.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  4. Anonymous12:27

    Haha bravo LHG

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:41

      Bravo Carte.. sorry I mean Fraport!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous16:02

      You guys are so boring

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  5. Anonymous12:30

    it was AIRBALTIC and NORWEGIAN ...

    Na prvi rok je ministrstvo prejelo prijave za štiri povezave. Letalska družba Airbaltic je v razpisu prijavila tri proge: Tenerife (nova proga) in Gran Canario (podaljšanje), ki sta bili izbrani za sofinanciranje, medtem ko proga Riga (podaljšanje) ni bila izbrana.

    Letalska družba Norwegian je prijavila progo Köbenhavn (podaljšanje), ki prav tako ni bila izbrana, pojasnjujejo.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:53

      So they lied it was for 4 airlines when it was for 4 air lines....

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous13:07

      Why didn't they extend the subsidies for RIX, CPH and LPA?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous15:15

      Four application, not four airlines. @12:53

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  6. Anonymous13:05

    Is this a joke

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  7. Anonymous13:20

    Perfect article about Slovenian aviation

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14:03

      LHG and FP cartelism yes

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous16:02

      Why don't you put your name and surname on these cartel comments, so we can see how serious you are?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous08:14

      @16:02 stop the crap please, you are anonymous also.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:58

      Well hut what 14:03 is saying gives grounds for investigations and possibly serious rectifications and yet no signs and no proof has ever been presented.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous10:44

      I guess there's also no corruption OU. PIR will have to elaborate :)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  8. Anonymous13:25

    Rubbish ffs

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  9. notLufthansa13:42

    This is total crap in the black box. If Slovenia really, REALLY wanted to increase connectivity, ministry would, together with Tourism board, representatives of once thriving Congress tourism and representatives of all industries which are beneficial of or need to have aviation connections, set a tiered list of cities which are important for them and supported by some rough data (like historical numbers of passengers, interest etc) and then issue a tender for those cities (or regions) together with strong propaganda for Slovenia and neighboring regions as tourist and otherwise nice destination. Also, state should appoint which connections are essential for economic, political and cultural reasons and also support those connections. Handing out small amounts of money for ANY connection and then selecting from few applicants ...that is very rigid way to do it. The results CAN'T be different from what we hear here. Not supporting Copenhagen as destination is beyond belief....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:03

      +1

      The question is what is really missing, to justify government money to boost connectivity. The nbr 1 numbers for tourist arrivals and overnights are from Germany, Italy, Austria, Croatia, Netherlands, Poland, France, and the UK.
      All those have good connections to LJU or are in reach with road traffic.

      For Slovenians going on vacation u have Croatia and Italy in reach for road traffic or from TRS u can reach FCO, NAP, Sicilia, Puglia, Sardinia with nonstop flights, on top of it u have MAD, BCN, LPA, TFS, ATH, IST, TIV, DXB, TLV or u can fly to/over CDG, AMS, BRU, LHR, ZRH, MUC, FRA, WAW, BEG to reach other destinations. Same counts for intercontinental tourists, who have access via these hubs to Slovenia. For ethnic traffic u have BEG, TGD, SKP, PRN and besides this all u still have HEL MAN, RIX, EDI, ORY, SAW, CPH for additional city break tourism.
      Slovenia is better connected than if u just consider the numbers from LJU Airport, cause a substantial part of the travel is being handled via TRS, ZAG (which are so close to Slovenia, that u almost can count them as SLO airports) and even VCE, KLU, GRZ, BUD handle SLO origin/dest travel. Slovenia has even the advantage of being located among tourist hot spots such as Austria, Italy, BUD and Croatia. So another part of tourism just visits Slovenia without overnight, but still spends money by food and shopping expenses and those numbers u even dont find in any official tourism statistic.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  10. Anonymous15:09

    Why not leisure flights to Slovenia. There are a lot of nights spended by foreignt tourists, 13 millions that's like Denmark, Sweden, Ireland. I checked Eurostat.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:22

      I mean Slovenia is not exactly a poor country but do you really want that the government subsidizes leisure routes? Most foreign tourist do come by car..

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous16:03

      They come by car because they can't fly into Ljubljana.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous19:07

      16:03 exactly. There was a poll done a few years back and most foreign tourists complained how difficult it was to fly into SLO.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous20:37

      Also, the average stay of tourists in Slovenia is around 2-3 days, which means that there are many overnight stays and tourists. There are also many tourists for ome day from Croatia and Italy.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous20:50

      Plenty of tourists who wish to visit Slovenia, plenty of money to be made. Feel free to start an airline and reap the profits.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous21:08

      20:50 thank God you are not in charge of the country as we would collapse in two years :)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous21:30

      So when there is nothing to be said against the argument, we resort to personal attacks. Got it. Have a good evening.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous21:41

      Your comment is supposed to be the argument? LOL!!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Reply
  11. Anonymous19:09

    S takimi razpisi je Slovenija neresna. Njeni prebivalci pa hodimo v Trst, Zagreb, še celo Celovec na Ryanair. Sramota. Za v SLO je pa preslab? Lepo vas prosim. Wake up my dear Slovenians in nehajte biti taki hohštaplerji.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous19:57

      If Slovenia's goal is to have 3-7 regular flights, it would be cheaper to establish an ''airline'' with one or two planes (which would be leased) on certain routes. The cheapest and best option would be, instead of struggling with subsidies.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous20:07

      In kaj priporočaš? Da se spet zmeče na desetine milijonov evrov letno, da bo imela peščica izbranih lepo plačane službe? Takšen altruizem, poln nepotizma in nesposobnosti se lahko greste z lastnim denarjem.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous21:38

      Tens of millions went because, for the first time, there were three times too many employees, and there was theft like you wouldn't believe (and there still is). We flew with an A319 to Prague (where the occupancy was about 40%). If Montenegro succeeds, we could too, but with a small number of employees and flying on routes that would be profitable, and optimizing employees (one person could comfortably do multiple tasks, instead of needing 2-4 employees for one job).

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous21:42

      +
      Oh, and they should be held criminally responsible. Where have you seen a company buy 15 planes (like Croatia Airlines) while operating at a loss? Simply: Poor management

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous21:51

      And you think that a country is capable of doing this now? It takes 2+ years to get an AOC. Fix the CAA first.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


Zagreb Airport, 1968

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

EX-YU capital airports set for mixed April, Wizz continues to dominate

Image

Flydubai suspends Ljubljana, reduces other EX-YU routes

Image

Croatia Airlines to add wet-leased ETF Airways ATR72

Image

Airbus pitches A220 for Air Serbia fleet renewal

Image

Ryanair warns of summer flight cancellations

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2026