Air Serbia will receive a share of the US $500 million raised on international markets by Etihad Airways, its airport services business, the Serbian carrier itself and four other Etihad partner airlines (Air Berlin, Air Seychelles, Alitalia, and Jet Airways). It marks the second platform financing transaction, following the success of last year’s bond which raised $700 million. The funds raised by the transaction will be used for capital expenditure, purchasing new aircraft and refinancing debt, depending on each individual airline’s needs. Last year, Etihad Airways, Etihad Airport Services, Air Berlin and Alitalia each received almost 20% of the funds. A further 16% was given to Jet Airways, while the remainder was divided between Air Serbia and Air Seychelles. The exact share each carrier will receive this time around has not been specified.
The additional funds for Air Serbia come in the lead up to the airline's launch of transatlantic flights. Furthermore, the carrier recently finalised the operating lease of an Airbus A330-200 from Jet Airways and Etihad Airways (as the sub-lessee), with the partaking of foreign export credit agencies and banks that provided financing for the lease which is said to be on a five-year term. Air Serbia recorded a net profit of 3.9 million euros and 305 million euros worth of revenue in 2015. The carrier's CEO, Dane Kondić, recently said, "Our strategy in 2016 is to strengthen the network further by taking advantage of Belgrade’s position as the gateway to the Balkans and capturing regional traffic flows to the United States".
Commenting on the latest transaction, James Hogan, President and CEO of Etihad Aviation Group, said, “With this second successful transaction, the international financial markets have continued to show their belief in the Etihad Airways Partners story". He added, "Our equity partner strategy is creating a total which is greater than the sum of its parts, a grouping which can work together to improve revenues, reduce costs and uncover exciting new business synergies. This transaction shows the strength of that grouping, as well as the strength of the individual members. This second tranche of combined fund-raising is part of our long term capital strategy".

Comments
Anyone knows if this is new debt or the one inherited from Jat?
Interesting that this money comes at a time when JU has to start paying their dues at BEG.
http://www.exyuaviation.com/2016/05/turkish-diverts-to-belgrade-over.html
Let's test their resolve to post insulting comments.
bi bila tu bez zastite i para drzave. Nije isplata dividende vec para skupljenih na trzistu novca. To mora da se vrati.
Sounds EXTREMELY expensive ans way above the market rate to me.
Such person should be blocked.
Please read the comment.
So if the state decides to sell it's 50% plus one share who is going to buy it?
Most of that money anyhow goes to leasing to Etihad, education etc., so it is not that Air Serbia will get this money to account.
0,5 million per month should be normal price, but god knows how much we pay for that and other planes. Concerning things we know how much we pay to Etihad, Air Berlin and Alitalia, we pay more than market price.
ZAG-FRA-SIN-MUC-ZAG or ZAG-ZRH-HKG-VIE-ZAG.
Zapravo je prestrašno da Etihad mora da traži kredite da bi cela grupacija opstala. Air Berlin, Alitalia, Jet, Darwin su rupe bez dna.
Na kraju ovde treba da se pita. Ako je Air Serbiji dato 10 miliona kredita prošle godine, a profit je 4 miliona to znači da je Air Serbija zapravo u minusu 6 miliona. I još kada se doda "investicija" Srbije preko BEG i direktno. Pa ovaj projekt košta daleko više nego Jat.
I što će da bude kada to sve dođe na naplatu, a pre ili kasnije će da dođe.
If I remember right, the 'loss' JU made last year was around 18 million euros, when putting in the subsidies it had received.
Compared to Jat, Air Serbia has 4 times more aircraft flying, many more destinations, frequencies, connectivity, more employed Serbs paying taxes and spending money in Serbia, not to mention that payments are being made on time.
Serbia is financing it in one way, but JU is directly and indirectly bringing money into Serbia.
Regarding the A320neo, originally it was to be 8 A319's, for which Serbia had an expensive deal legacy of the Milosevic regime, for which Airbus was going to take Serbia to court for, which Serbia would of lost. Not only would Serbia have to pay for expensive 'older generation' ac it would have to pay legal fees. USD$23.5 million has been payed for the A319's which got transferred over to a new deal made by EY through their purchasing power which gave JU a better deal.
I'm not saying Air Serbia hasn't cost Serbia, but it is far less than what Jat cost us.
What would be its average age during this lease contract?
"which is said to be on a five-year term"
Thank you for proving my point Anon 1:41 PM!
Air Serbia is paying a lot more money for leasing this A330-200 from EY group than market price.
Plus Air Serbia will have to pay for the D-check.
I don't know but is sounds like colonial terms to me where the colonies were forced to buy products only from the colonial powers.
To actually be profitable you need your ticket and cargo sales revenues to be higher than your expenses.
Anonymous said...
People there is no "alliance" or anything like that as you keep on writing.
There is the ETIHAD group of companies.
ETIHAD management decides what the subsidiary airlines will do.
If EY wants ASL or any other airline to help one of the struggling members like Jet by leasing surplus aircraft at expensive lease rates it can do it and it does.
This is because it is not alliance of airlines but subsidiaries of Etihad.
+1
The purpose of the EY group is to maximize return on investment by the EY owners, the Abu Dhabi emirate.
Not to make the best decisions fro the individual airlines.
You do not know how much ASL pays for this bird. It could be that they pay more to help Jet. Or it could be that they pay less so that Jet helps them.
Bottomline is, even if they got it for free you would have found a way to spin it so that you can share your daily dose of hate with us.
I know you lot hate them so bad and dream about their death every single night, but raising some extra cash in the market is really not some kind of genuine conspiracy of ASL's management. It is what companies do, airlines included.
Kako če Air Serbija sve to da plača? Gledaj i vidjet češ. Možda če boljeti ali makar češ biti svjedokom.
Što če biti kada to sve dođe na naplatu? Vidjet čemo. No prije toga, prvi koji se treba suočiti sa naplatom si TI koji trebaš biti zauvijek udaljen sa ovog bloga zbog javnog izrugivanja osobnom identitetu drugog korisnika, protivno njegovoj volji. Takvi se stalkeri u civiliziranom svijetu udaljuju iz civiliziranog društva a njihove se propovijedi ne uzimaju u obzir niti im se dozvoljava iznositi ih.
You do know that ASL pays very high ease rates for this bird. It could be that they pay more to help Jet. Or it could be that they pay more so that EY recoups quickly its investment.
Bottomline is, even if they paid 1 million Euros a month for it you would have found a way to spin it as something positive so that you can share your daily chearleading routine with us.
If there are no fleet investments (just leasing expenses) - so for what reason there is need for cash while being profitable for some years now?
INN-NS
INN-NS
INN-NS
Hot Line, you want to say that Mr. Mali is lying? He said several times that lease is 500.000 EUR per month.
Pa ti za dve godine nemoj da potpišeš ugovor prema kondicijama Etihada pa da vidiš kad krene vračanje para
40 miliona "investicije"
20 miliona kredita
lizing 10 A320neo
However, if your profit is lower than the expansion investment then you have other options. You can loan the money from banks and hope to remain profitable after you pay the installments. Or you can raise some money on the capital market under better terms than those offered by the banks. Or, if you have a strategic partner who decides on how the expansion will be financed, you leave the decision to the strategic partner.
So where exactly do you see a problem?
2010. -107 milijuna EUR
2011. -6 milijuna EUR
2012. -119 milijuna EUR
2013. -50 milijuna EUR
2014. -580 milijuna EUR
2015. -199 milijuna EUR
Dakle vidljivo je da je stanje od dolaska Etihada (jun 2014.) lošije nego prije preuzimanja.
Ovo me podsječa na one tvoje izjave kako je Austrian gubitaš iako je te godine i nekoliko godina prije bio pozitivan.
Sinko dragi, nije dovoljno biti navijač i željeti neke činjenice. One se neće ostvariti zato što ti tako želiš. Treba malo i čitati, informirati se, pronači podatke. Sramota je ovako!
20 miliona EUR je kredit, prikupljanje novaca na TRŽIŠTU, nikakva to nisu ulaganja. U ugovoru piše da Ethad može da prekine ugovor kada god poželi i to bez objašnjenja razloga i tada Air Serbia mora da vrati 60 miliona od 100 miliona "investicije". Naravno, tada je i ovih 20 miliona od prošle i ove godine koje treba vratiti.
A što se nesigurnih kredita tiče. Kreditori pare daju i visokorizičnim mušterijama. Pa i Srbija i daleko rizičnije stalno dobivaju milijarde od JP Morgana Chase. I rade nas tako dužničkim robljem. Več više od 100 godina. Što je vaš argument ovde? Pa to ja i u ovom slučaju govorim.
Lufthansa ima potpuno pogrešnu politiku prema radnicima što je rezultat štrajkova. Ne cenim previše LH, posebno u odnosu prema radnicima. A i nisu moj prvi izbor za letove. Kakve to veze ima sa Etihadom ili Air Serbijom.
Airbuseve je naručio Etihad u svojoj velikoj narudžbi, a ne Air Serbija. Ugovor je potpisao Etihad, on je uplatio pare.
Believe it or not, financing capital expenditures from profits/cash reserves only is often not the most prefered option. Most of the companies do a split where the portion is financed from equity and portion by debt issuance. The reasons for this are multiple but it involve interest rates, overall cost of borowing, company risk profile, minimum cash reserves required etc.
OS jeste bio nekad gubitas nisam pricao od skoro a mozemo G Purgeru i vase gluposti da nabrajamo. A posto sve znate evo vam zanimljiv clanak.
http://www.aerotelegraph.com/wird-alitalia-zur-erfolgsstory-etihad-airways-investment-turnaround-flotte-vergroessern-a350-dreamliner-partnerschaft-air-berlin
INN-NS
INN-NS
no aircraft is bought? Is there a real estate investment of Air Serbia?
Which assets have been activated by investments?
This way, JU will get 10 new generation A320 neo aircraft.
A ono sa Austrianom se svi sečamo. Tvrdio si da je Austrian u tom momentu neprofitabilan i da je to već godinama. A to nije bila istina i čovek te lepo demantiro.
A to da kasne vesti, pa nije nečija želja vest, nego želja. Vest bi bila da su u prvom kvartalu pozitivni, a eto nisu.