Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


JAT's inter-city bus service
Belgrade - Niš, 1980s

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2025/26 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • May28
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Niš Airport maintains strong growth

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps
NEWS FLASH


Niš Constantine the Great Airport handled 42.949 passengers in October, representing an increase of 43.9% compared to the same month last year. The number of aircraft movements grew 95.6% to 442. Over the elapsed ten months, Niš Airport welcomed 338.527 travellers through its doors, up 14%. Aircraft movements improved 25.8% to 3.030.

MonthPAXChange (%)
JAN25.221▼ 11.4
FEB23.651▼ 13.5
MAR26.448▼ 9.1
APR29.480▼ 2.6
MAY31.026▲ 3.7
JUN29.832▲ 2.7
JUL35.646▲ 11.9
AUG49.898▲ 61.1
SEP44.376▲ 47.7
OCT42.949▲ 43.9

November 21, 2019
Newsflash Niš Results 2019 serbia
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous13:41

    What I find especially interesting is that October was almost as strong as September. Usually that's when passenger numbers start to fall. I guess JU helped. Anyone know how routes are perfoming? Especially Bologna?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  2. Anonymous13:49

    Today Lju- Ini =59 pax

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:53

      Ouch! That's disastrous

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous14:09

      Not for JU as these flights are financially suppoted by GoS

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous14:12

      no subsidy is that high that you can fly around with half empty aircrafts.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous14:14

      uff

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous14:18

      Well obviously the route isn't a financial pit since it wasn't cut like BUD.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  3. Anonymous13:53

    Flew MLA INI and there were maybe 15 empty seats on the plane. Mostly Serbs and around 20 Albanians onboard. I saw KS plates in front of the terminal.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  4. Anonymous14:09

    nr of aircrafts improved 95% but nr of pax only 43%. poz happy tax payer

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14:19

      Yeah I'm sure you pay taxes in Serbia. ;)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous14:50

      If there is enough demand on new routes from INI then there won't be any need for subsidies. They are subsidized for a reason so don't see why ouch.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous16:19

      wher there is no enough demand there should be no routes

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous16:53

      You obviously don't work in the private sector. #gottaspendmoneytomakemoney

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  5. Anonymous14:34

    Any other PAX/ Loadfactor information about JU INI flights?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mixajlo15:23

      No, but BLQ-INI is 40 and INI-BLQ 90, last month. Today I am on the same route, will see later

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous16:05

      Let us know how the load is.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Mixajlo10:29

      21.11. BLQ-INI just 29, from INI about 30 (I saw from the gate)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:43

      OUCH.
      I guess if the brand would be WizzAir the load would be much higher (when I compare the WizzAir loadfactors from INI).
      I thought Serbians like to fly with their flag carrier? Or is it still the reasont that the flights are not known enough?
      Maybe it looks better next year.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous11:14

      it has very little to do with brands more with demand.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous12:32

      Then it is strange that WizzAir has on similar routes to regional airports better loadfactors then AirSerbia to main cities, for example when comparing loadfactors on AirSerbia from Belgrade to Germany with WizzAir from Belgrade to Germany. Seems people prefer to drive to a regional airport and then flying instead of taking the direct flight from the city airport.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Mixajlo14:58

      Serbs in Italy: Veneto 10.000, Emilia-Romagna 3.300. Who is responsable for the flights to BLQ? Treviso is a perfect solution for us. Ryan from BGY was almost every time with a LF 90-95%. Only one reason for BLQ?
      Also, BEG-VCE flied at wednesday with a 16 passengers.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous16:16

      @Mihajlo the same guy who thought BUD (and LJU) is a great idea too

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous17:28

      A regional jet like Embraer 190 or a CRJ9000 would be sufficient for those routes. Unfortunately Air Serbia only have >140seat jets.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Unknown09:12

      Here are the results of the new INI services to Germany...July and August http://fkb-fans.forumprofi.de/t1340f2012-Nis-Serbien-AirSerbia-Ryanair-und-wizzair.html

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous12:58

      Crazy when you look at the loadfactor in August per airline on INI routes to Germany:

      Ryanair 98,6%
      WizzAir 94,6%
      AirSerbia 63%

      Will be intersting how they improve, but does AirSerbia really do some advertisting/marketing about the new INI flights?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Reply
  6. Anonymous15:22

    Questions:

    1. What are the future projections for INI for the upcoming 5 years? If BEG has a projection of 12 million by 2035 then will INI be where BEG is today?
    2. How about the future of KVO? Will it not hurt the current situation?
    3. Finally, if INI is competing with SKP, which routes will not be duplicated such as SZG and FCO?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:17

      INI is competing with SKP?
      in your mindset BNX is probably also competing with ZAG

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous16:54

      What he meant is that both airports are fighting for passengers from the same catchment area.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  7. Anonymous15:38

    26% more operation and just 14% more passengers. That makes LF very low!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:06

      Of course since a lot of JU routes are subsidized, it will take time for them to develop.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  8. Anonymous16:07

    Congratulations INI! The best is yet to come!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  9. Anonymous18:17

    Bravo!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


JAT's inter-city bus service
Belgrade - Niš, 1980s

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Croatia Airlines posts heavy losses and negative equity

Image

Air Serbia to add more A320s to fleet

Image

Two airlines apply for new subsidised flights to Slovenia

Image

Belgrade Airport city rail link work advances

Image

Croatia Airlines to retire one A320

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025