Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


"Qantastic" 
Qantas ad for Belgrade flights, 1975

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2025/26 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • May50
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Air Serbia to resume four Niš routes

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps
NEWS FLASH


Air Serbia plans to restore another four routes from Niš from March to complement its existing service to Hahn. The airline has resumed ticket sales for flights from Constantine the Great Airport to Nuremberg, Salzburg and Hannover, which are due to return to the network from late March, while seasonal services to Tivat will begin mid-June. At this point, the airline has not restored ticket sales for flights to Ljubljana, Bologna, Friedrichshafen, Gothenburg, Baden Baden and Rome.

January 26, 2021
Covid-19 Newsflash Niš serbia Summer 2021
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous11:08

    Bravo JU!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  2. Anonymous11:08

    Well done Air Serbia.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  3. Anonymous11:24

    I hope so Baden Baden is coming

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  4. Anonymous11:26

    Ništa ne prepuštaju slučaju i bore se za svakog putnika. Brzo reaguju na splet okolnosti. Polako se navikavamo na činjenicu da imamo uspešnog nacionalnog avio prevoznika.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:33

      :D :D :D

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:36

      Посебно ме радује јер нису одустали од Салцбурга. Велика прилика сада када се Визер повукао из Скопља и Београда. Остала је велика рупа.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous12:12

      Anon 11:26
      Kakva borba? Zar ovo nije PSO koji su svejedno obavezni operirati i gdje je konkurenciji zabranjeno otvoriti iste linije?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous12:15

      Anon 11:26
      What are you talking about? This ix PSO.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous13:00

      Anon 12.12
      Ako niste upoznati sa trenutnom epidemiološkim situacijom u toku je pandemija covid 19. Niko ninašta nije obavezan pa tako ni JU da obnovi PSO rute.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous13:04

      Naravno no pitao sam o kakvoj se "borbi" priča ako su ovo svejedno njihove linije na kojima imaju zastičeni monopol. Čim dođe potreba ove linije se svejedno trebaju operirati jer su plaćeni.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous13:11

      you are mostly correct @13.04 except that part "Čim dođe potreba" which is contradictoring with the following "svejedno operirati". There wasnt a potreba for most of these routes (and the LF is indicating that). They just wanted to copy what Wizz was doing elsewhere

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous14:50

      Не постоји потреба да се лети по сваку цену, Будимпешта је одличан доказ тога. Неке линије као Франкфурт, Гетеборг и Салцбург су се јако добро пуниле пре короне.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous15:06

      That's all great, but they're violating the tender which they won. As far as I remember, they were not supposed to pick the routes they want to operate, it was "take it or leave it", the whole pack of routes.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous15:44

      Mr. "svejedno operirati" gets trigerred easily.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous16:51

      Hahn numbers which is considered the best route are publicly visible and i would be very careful of using "јако добро"

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Anonymous17:17

      Where can i find those numbers?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    13. Anonymous18:25

      Last available data are for September 2020 (flights originating from Germany):
      Hahn: 22,2% LF
      Hannover: 14,7% LF
      Nuremberg: 14% LF

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    14. Reply
  5. Anonymous11:38

    About bloody time. Serbia makes more money from INI flights than BEG, as the airport is owned by the State.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:07

      Not just that but INI started making a profit even with €3 charge because its costs are so low. Unfortunately now you can't see their financial performance because it's all together with Airports of Serbia. So one loss making company was turned profitable.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous12:14

      i need to dissapoint you here but youre wrong

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous14:51

      APR says otherwise, they had a profit before they were merged with other airports. I guess cargo helped as well.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  6. Anonymous11:59

    How will this affect neighbouring SKP? Most importantly the suspended W6 SZG route. Does that mean they will never resume?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:01

      It's not suspended, it's cancelled
      https://www.exyuaviation.com/2020/12/wizz-air-shelves-new-skopje-route.html

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous12:13

      it will affect them with nothing

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous12:49

      ironically it will affect them positively, passengers to Friedrichshafen, Gothenburg, Baden Baden and Rome will move there

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous13:01

      Why would this efect anybody except Nis' economy positively?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous13:27

      Ironically by the time W6 will have resumed Baden Baden and Rome, JU will have already started selling tickets for those routes

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Dude13:41

      am afraid JU in INI is zero threat to anybody except tax payers pockets maybe

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous13:54

      Having JU resuming the INI-SZG route, it will be difficult for W6 to restart SKP-SZG because in the region, there is no other direct route to SZG.
      The interesting thing is that INI has almost 100% same routes as in SKP especially those to Germany with the exception of BLQ and TIV.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous14:02

      W6 flies to every German village from SKP, not much of a surprise

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous14:55

      "Having JU resuming the INI-SZG route, it will be difficult for W6 to restart SKP-SZG because in the region, there is no other direct route to SZG."

      lmao

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous15:33

      14:02, yes. I just counted them actually:
      SKP - 11, I think this is the highest number of connections in ex-Yu.

      INI counts with 2 but is also and BER with FR but also 2 Austrian connections.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous16:44

      well BER is likely gone

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Reply
  7. Mixajlo14:20

    Selling tickets is not guarantee that flights will be operated. There is possibility to cancel all at the start of summer season...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14:21

      Of course but they weren't selling tickets at all and just started now.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous16:52

      @14.21 they were selling these 4 since Nov/Dec.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  8. MM17:42

    As far as I remember they got around 5 mil EUR for 2.5 years to deliver 22/25 flights a week.
    I don't see why they are not performing all scheduled flights as there is no loss. All expenses are covered anyway. (Except were they are forbidden to fly of course)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mixajlo18:12

      This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous21:33

      MM: you don't see why Wizz is not performing all scheduled flights as there is no loss? Wizz gets subsidies at places like SKP and BUD but you only question Air Serbia? Double standard.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous22:47

      OU was getting also money for all domestic PSO routes. Did they fly them all during last whole year?

      Of course not.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  9. Anonymous21:49

    Nis keeps on winning!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous22:54

      INI registered almost half a million of passengers in 2019, this airport used to have 20 thousand per year. You can clearly see that ASL has cemented its position in the airport and may base a second aircraft in the future. INI may reach the 1 million level after the pandemic is over.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Mixajlo23:14

      1 million is not possible in the next 30 years. Contract with Vinci is limiting domestic airports in the circle of 200km to do not reach that number (INI, KVO)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous00:26

      BEG - INI is over 200 km.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous01:58

      So how will there by any domestic Serbian routes? You mean BEG-KVO? KVO is more focused on cargo compared to passengers.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous02:05

      I don't think the contract with Vinci has any restrictions on domestic routes.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Mixajlo06:16

      It's about domestic airports, not routes. Sorry for 200km.
      Distance is 200,6km by air, by the highway is 237km.

      "Nakon više suprotstavljenih izjava, predsednik Srbije Aleksandar Vučić, ministarska Mihajlović i njen pomoćnik Zoran Ilić
      direktno ili indirektno „priznali“ su da je u koncesionom ugovoru predviđeno da niški i drugi aerodromi u Srbiji, u radijusu
      od 230 kilometara od beogradskog, ne smeju imati više od po milion putnika godišnje sve dok beogradski aerodrom ne
      dostigne 12 miliona putnika"

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous08:25

      Директно или индиректно? Шта то уопште значи?
      У уговору, а овде је већ пренето, стоји да нишки аеродром не може расти на уштрб београдског. Другим речима не прихватају да компаније напуштају BEG да би летеле са INI-a.
      Не разумем зашто се вештачки диже прашина око ове теме када смо видели на основу чињеница и искуства пре короне да се оба аеродрома неометано развијају. Рајанер је увео Малту из Ниша, дакле отворено су изабрали тај аеродром као главни у Србији, а Ванси ништа није рекао.

      То нас доводи до закључка да Французи праве озбиљне паре у Београду.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous17:30

      @Mihajlo 23:14
      From vinci-airports.com: Belgrade airport. Concession length. 25 years. End of contract (year). 2043

      Concession contract ends 21 years from now. Your statement that 1 million is not possible in the next 30 years due to secret concession clause is therefore completely false.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Mixajlo23:10

      @Anon
      Sorry, that is 5 years less. It's not a big difference to declare for completely false like anonymous.
      Ending contract is for almost 22 years (dec 2043)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous02:58

      First, you said 1 million is not possible in the next 30 years. Contract expires in 22 years. That's EIGHT years off, not 5! Second, where does it say INI is limited to 1 mil? Not some indirect "admisssion", show us the contract. Third, even if true, who can say that BEG won't reach 12 million passengers in 8-10 years? That would be TWENTY years before your statement! Fourth, who can guarantee INI can reach 1 million before BEG gets to 12 million? You have 4 items to work on and none of them you can win.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


"Qantastic" 
Qantas ad for Belgrade flights, 1975

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

easyJet ups Belgrade operations to fend off Air Serbia

Image

Ex-Air Serbia CEO to lead Mozambique Airlines recovery

Image

Air Serbia and Croatia Airlines within Europe’s top sixty largest

Image

Montenegro to decide who takes over country’s airports next month

Image

Turkish Airlines is Slovenia’s busiest in Q1, Swiss adds most passengers

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025